You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@devicemap.apache.org by "eberhard speer jr." <se...@ducis.net> on 2014/07/17 11:46:12 UTC
.Net versions review
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
following Bertrand's guidance, I've updated the .Net Review release
page : http://www.ducis.net/static/docs/dotnet/rel.html
(just easier/faster)
I would appreciate it if you could review/comment.
It seems to me that since those clients were developed in unison with
the java client, they should be release together as well, so that I
think should be our aim.
Thanks,
esjr
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTx5tkAAoJEOxywXcFLKYcLK4H/0QXvFcdJg5rWcETzE5dFq3d
7cKH0TZ3JWqhD0nQLi9/ArOiyGMUlH3GitEKQEdvMc5ah/uf0rmq4r9y8gj+1JwE
Eu+jR3N3hQ1pAcC8LfniEUxZL75CoDi4kzC2x62JihLe/PSaWgshdWv9iXiI+c9Y
mKOKzQjwYvSMW7+Wqij14KW196Iez4spIE/bZFD5waMcQ0wF2OhzH9XSEQT5TOZU
Oj2TynwTjkFkp5DEPBk24PwVWqIMx+vzH/a2UENrR6+uiWXwo5/8FlWlrfuGwYGX
HhHCJqlZrbi1xTLBQmAHsht6+2gSBHIGPUXDk9/nZUIbkZx+MZKrbbnlkPseaqQ=
=Zrjq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: .Net versions review
Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>.
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:46 AM, eberhard speer jr. <se...@ducis.net> wrote:
> ...It seems to me that since those clients were developed in unison with
> the java client, they should be release together as well, so that I
> think should be our aim....
I agree that it's good to release those at about the same time than
the java client, but it's also IMO better to consider them a separate
release, so that if one or the other fails the Incubator PMC vote we
can at least release something.
Thanks for preparing those, I hope to be able to review today or tomorrow.
-Bertrand
Re: .Net versions review
Posted by Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com>.
Will check it out, there was no copy in /releases when I last checked or
voted on that thread[?]
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacretaz@apache.org
> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Don't mean to be picky, but based on
> >
> > - devicemap-java-client-1.0.0/
> > <
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/devicemap/tags/releases/devicemap-java-client-1.0.0/
> >
> >
> > I believe I saw an archive called
> > "devicemap-client-java-1.0.0-incubating.tar" earlier...
> >
>
> That would be a question for the VOTE thread of that release.
>
> -Bertrand
>
Re: .Net versions review
Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>.
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Don't mean to be picky, but based on
>
> - devicemap-java-client-1.0.0/
> <http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/devicemap/tags/releases/devicemap-java-client-1.0.0/>
>
> I believe I saw an archive called
> "devicemap-client-java-1.0.0-incubating.tar" earlier...
>
That would be a question for the VOTE thread of that release.
-Bertrand
Re: .Net versions review
Posted by Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com>.
Don't mean to be picky, but based on
- devicemap-java-client-1.0.0/
<http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/devicemap/tags/releases/devicemap-java-client-1.0.0/>
I believe I saw an archive called
"devicemap-client-java-1.0.0-incubating.tar" earlier.
First, should the tag in "releases" also use the postfix "-incubator" and
second, would it be possible if the tags and download archives have names
matching as close as possible?[?]
(anywhere, regardless of Java, VB or C#)
Thanks,
Werner
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 1:08 PM, eberhard speer jr. <se...@ducis.net>
wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> All requested corrections have been made excpet for the SVN tags thing
> [see below]
>
>
> esjr
>
> On 18/07/2014 13:11, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:46 AM, eberhard speer jr.
> > <se...@ducis.net> wrote:
> >> ...following Bertrand's guidance, I've updated the .Net Review
> >> release page : http://www.ducis.net/static/docs/dotnet/rel.html
> >> ...
> >
> > I had a look at the following archives:
> > SHA1(./csharp/devicemap.zip)=
> > ddec155204384d3e658ed6a553a79509312afddd
> > SHA1(./vbnet/devicemap.zip)=
> > 191956b5e20650ce31c7ed42be19f888925ea2b7
> >
> > Using different names for the C# and VB.Net devicemap.zip archives
> > would be less confusing. Also, both need to include -incubating in
> > their name. I suggest devicemap-csharp-incubating-1.0.0.zip (or
> > whatever the version number is) and the same with -vbnet.
>
> No problem,
> devicemap-csharp-incubating-1.0.0.zip
> devicemap-vbnet-incubating-1.0.0.zip
>
> it is
>
>
> > I don't see svn tags under
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/devicemap/tags/releases/
> > , could you create or move them there, one tag per release
> > archive? What's under the tags should match what's in the release
> > archives.
>
> Not a clue about this tag business, looks to me like an exact copy of
> what's under trunk, so, if someone could move it to where you like
> it...done.
>
> >
> > Both archives contain a number of binary files, including .exe
> > .dll and even a .git folder - that's not ok, Apache releases source
> > code only. Can you reduce them to the actual source code and
> > remove anything that's not required for someone to build the
> > software themselves?
> >
> > I see that there's also a good number of binary files in svn under
> > devicemap/csharp and devicemap/vbnet. I'm clueless about C# and
> > VB.Net but I hope this is not needed - we should also have only
> > source code in our svn repository. Is that something that you can
> > easily fix, or do those environment require binaries to be checked
> > in in order to build the projects?
>
> they can be removed, no problem, left-overs from tests
>
> > HTH, -Bertrand
> >
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTyQA8AAoJEOxywXcFLKYco1MH/2pbGejuUaJSVeku+uY7KLKu
> 1sv6HP3eoDFK7PR6NIV/iuFAQUhZsLrYfzeR7B4xpHA6IuSL1lMi/JZNZtZxwUGh
> XqW0L0ldyeGR+8enF6veM2W0Y7PXBUpqWabhv1r/e7qM45SPbOXH5KfTwi/IFLCq
> TdiXBaDoA74+Hgkf3sFcGDpkjpPdQWX0IUNeAYJnzbPdw8Ov8XxPi59Ijd91DehH
> AWAEXtCCQYFIofriRndWub9olFuG/295hcG5xbPNqKln6vQy6z7w4FotGWRaG+y0
> c97ZtluUyvVf29XDi/1FrRy2KYyzOPQp+/51LbnMugme+5MXV06ufTnSOuyz2jw=
> =2+59
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
Re: .Net versions review
Posted by "eberhard speer jr." <se...@ducis.net>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
All requested corrections have been made excpet for the SVN tags thing
[see below]
esjr
On 18/07/2014 13:11, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:46 AM, eberhard speer jr.
> <se...@ducis.net> wrote:
>> ...following Bertrand's guidance, I've updated the .Net Review
>> release page : http://www.ducis.net/static/docs/dotnet/rel.html
>> ...
>
> I had a look at the following archives:
> SHA1(./csharp/devicemap.zip)=
> ddec155204384d3e658ed6a553a79509312afddd
> SHA1(./vbnet/devicemap.zip)=
> 191956b5e20650ce31c7ed42be19f888925ea2b7
>
> Using different names for the C# and VB.Net devicemap.zip archives
> would be less confusing. Also, both need to include -incubating in
> their name. I suggest devicemap-csharp-incubating-1.0.0.zip (or
> whatever the version number is) and the same with -vbnet.
No problem,
devicemap-csharp-incubating-1.0.0.zip
devicemap-vbnet-incubating-1.0.0.zip
it is
> I don't see svn tags under
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/devicemap/tags/releases/
> , could you create or move them there, one tag per release
> archive? What's under the tags should match what's in the release
> archives.
Not a clue about this tag business, looks to me like an exact copy of
what's under trunk, so, if someone could move it to where you like
it...done.
>
> Both archives contain a number of binary files, including .exe
> .dll and even a .git folder - that's not ok, Apache releases source
> code only. Can you reduce them to the actual source code and
> remove anything that's not required for someone to build the
> software themselves?
>
> I see that there's also a good number of binary files in svn under
> devicemap/csharp and devicemap/vbnet. I'm clueless about C# and
> VB.Net but I hope this is not needed - we should also have only
> source code in our svn repository. Is that something that you can
> easily fix, or do those environment require binaries to be checked
> in in order to build the projects?
they can be removed, no problem, left-overs from tests
> HTH, -Bertrand
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTyQA8AAoJEOxywXcFLKYco1MH/2pbGejuUaJSVeku+uY7KLKu
1sv6HP3eoDFK7PR6NIV/iuFAQUhZsLrYfzeR7B4xpHA6IuSL1lMi/JZNZtZxwUGh
XqW0L0ldyeGR+8enF6veM2W0Y7PXBUpqWabhv1r/e7qM45SPbOXH5KfTwi/IFLCq
TdiXBaDoA74+Hgkf3sFcGDpkjpPdQWX0IUNeAYJnzbPdw8Ov8XxPi59Ijd91DehH
AWAEXtCCQYFIofriRndWub9olFuG/295hcG5xbPNqKln6vQy6z7w4FotGWRaG+y0
c97ZtluUyvVf29XDi/1FrRy2KYyzOPQp+/51LbnMugme+5MXV06ufTnSOuyz2jw=
=2+59
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: .Net versions review
Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>.
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:46 AM, eberhard speer jr. <se...@ducis.net> wrote:
> ...following Bertrand's guidance, I've updated the .Net Review release
> page : http://www.ducis.net/static/docs/dotnet/rel.html ...
I had a look at the following archives:
SHA1(./csharp/devicemap.zip)= ddec155204384d3e658ed6a553a79509312afddd
SHA1(./vbnet/devicemap.zip)= 191956b5e20650ce31c7ed42be19f888925ea2b7
Using different names for the C# and VB.Net devicemap.zip archives
would be less confusing. Also, both need to include -incubating in
their name. I suggest devicemap-csharp-incubating-1.0.0.zip (or
whatever the version number is) and the same with -vbnet.
I don't see svn tags under
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/devicemap/tags/releases/ ,
could you create or move them there, one tag per release archive?
What's under the tags should match what's in the release archives.
Both archives contain a number of binary files, including .exe .dll
and even a .git folder - that's not ok, Apache releases source code
only. Can you reduce them to the actual source code and remove
anything that's not required for someone to build the software
themselves?
I see that there's also a good number of binary files in svn under
devicemap/csharp and devicemap/vbnet. I'm clueless about C# and VB.Net
but I hope this is not needed - we should also have only source code
in our svn repository. Is that something that you can easily fix, or
do those environment require binaries to be checked in in order to
build the projects?
HTH,
-Bertrand