You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@yunikorn.apache.org by "Kinga Marton (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/10/11 13:21:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (YUNIKORN-842) [Umbrella] YuniKorn performance tuning and benchmark

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YUNIKORN-842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17427122#comment-17427122 ] 

Kinga Marton commented on YUNIKORN-842:
---------------------------------------

Is it possible to create some table with the resource consumption of YuniKorn in case of different cluster size and node numbers?

It would be helpful to have a documentation about the suggested resources for YuniKorn according to the cluster size.

We found out that for example the default resource settings are not enough for 400+ cluster.

> [Umbrella] YuniKorn performance tuning and benchmark
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YUNIKORN-842
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YUNIKORN-842
>             Project: Apache YuniKorn
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: core - scheduler, shim - kubernetes
>            Reporter: Weiwei Yang
>            Assignee: Ting Yao,Huang
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.0.0
>
>
> http://yunikorn.apache.org/docs/next/performance/evaluate_perf_function_with_kubemark is a bit out-of-dated, we want to reveal the performance benchmark with the latest codebase. With this effort, we want to ellivate possible bottleneck and further improve the throughput and performance. In this process, we will also further improve the metrics system.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@yunikorn.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@yunikorn.apache.org