You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to c-dev@axis.apache.org by John Hawkins <HA...@uk.ibm.com> on 2004/11/16 14:32:24 UTC
SSL WSDL2Ws options
Hi Folks,
there are some options on WSDL2ws for ssl ->
-c<none|ssl> channel security (ssl|none) - default is none
What do they do? Why does a user have to decide at this time whether their
service is securty enabled or not? Sounds wrong to me?
cheers,
John.
John Hawkins
Re: SSL WSDL2Ws options
Posted by Damitha Kumarage <da...@opensource.lk>.
Yes we can safely remove these code from wsdl2ws tool and other places
since we are usin https in the url to identify secure requests
thanks
damitha
> I have seen this secure option in the code and I think they are no more
> operational.
>
> There was an effort for SLL implementation in 1.0 (and may be in 1.1) and
> this option was for
> that. But later this was deprecated by the new transport astract layer
> desing and this option is
> no more valid with the new transport desing we have.
>
> As the latest efforts on SSL support is independent of the generated code
> (which is the correct
> way to support channel security) I think we can very safely get rid of
> this WSDL2Ws tool option.
>
> Thanks,
> Samisa...
>
> --- John Hawkins <HA...@uk.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi, does anyone know where these came from or what they do?
>>
>>
>> John Hawkins
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> John
>> Hawkins/UK/IBM@IB
>> MGB
>> To
>> axis-c-dev@ws.apache.org
>> 16/11/2004 13:32
>> cc
>>
>> Subject
>> Please respond to SSL WSDL2Ws options
>> "Apache AXIS C
>> Developers List"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Folks,
>> there are some options on WSDL2ws for ssl ->
>>
>> -c<none|ssl> channel security (ssl|none) - default is
>> none
>>
>> What do they do? Why does a user have to decide at this time whether
>> their
>> service is securty enabled or not? Sounds wrong to me?
>>
>> cheers,
>> John.
>>
>> John Hawkins
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today!
> http://my.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
--
Damitha Kumarage
hSenid Software International (PVT) Ltd
Re: SSL WSDL2Ws options
Posted by John Hawkins <HA...@uk.ibm.com>.
Thanks Samisa,
I'll raise a JIRA and if no comments I'll go ahead.
John Hawkins
Samisa Abeysinghe
<samisa_abeysingh
e@yahoo.com> To
Apache AXIS C Developers List
17/11/2004 09:20 <ax...@ws.apache.org>
cc
Please respond to Subject
"Apache AXIS C Re: SSL WSDL2Ws options
Developers List"
I have seen this secure option in the code and I think they are no more
operational.
There was an effort for SLL implementation in 1.0 (and may be in 1.1) and
this option was for
that. But later this was deprecated by the new transport astract layer
desing and this option is
no more valid with the new transport desing we have.
As the latest efforts on SSL support is independent of the generated code
(which is the correct
way to support channel security) I think we can very safely get rid of this
WSDL2Ws tool option.
Thanks,
Samisa...
--- John Hawkins <HA...@uk.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hi, does anyone know where these came from or what they do?
>
>
> John Hawkins
>
>
>
>
>
> John
> Hawkins/UK/IBM@IB
> MGB
To
> axis-c-dev@ws.apache.org
> 16/11/2004 13:32
cc
>
>
Subject
> Please respond to SSL WSDL2Ws options
> "Apache AXIS C
> Developers List"
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Folks,
> there are some options on WSDL2ws for ssl ->
>
> -c<none|ssl> channel security (ssl|none) - default is
none
>
> What do they do? Why does a user have to decide at this time whether
their
> service is securty enabled or not? Sounds wrong to me?
>
> cheers,
> John.
>
> John Hawkins
>
>
>
>
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today!
http://my.yahoo.com
Re: SSL WSDL2Ws options
Posted by Samisa Abeysinghe <sa...@yahoo.com>.
In the Call class we have:
int AXISCALL initialize(PROVIDERTYPE nStyle, int secure);
and
int openConnection(int secure);
The secure parameters in these methods are not used at all. Ideally they have to be removed from
the code to avoid confusion. The WSDL tool option must have been based on these parameters.
Thanks,
Samisa...
--- Samisa Abeysinghe <sa...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I have seen this secure option in the code and I think they are no more operational.
>
> There was an effort for SLL implementation in 1.0 (and may be in 1.1) and this option was for
> that. But later this was deprecated by the new transport astract layer desing and this option is
> no more valid with the new transport desing we have.
>
> As the latest efforts on SSL support is independent of the generated code (which is the correct
> way to support channel security) I think we can very safely get rid of this WSDL2Ws tool option.
>
> Thanks,
> Samisa...
>
> --- John Hawkins <HA...@uk.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi, does anyone know where these came from or what they do?
> >
> >
> > John Hawkins
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > John
> > Hawkins/UK/IBM@IB
> > MGB To
> > axis-c-dev@ws.apache.org
> > 16/11/2004 13:32 cc
> >
> > Subject
> > Please respond to SSL WSDL2Ws options
> > "Apache AXIS C
> > Developers List"
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Folks,
> > there are some options on WSDL2ws for ssl ->
> >
> > -c<none|ssl> channel security (ssl|none) - default is none
> >
> > What do they do? Why does a user have to decide at this time whether their
> > service is securty enabled or not? Sounds wrong to me?
> >
> > cheers,
> > John.
> >
> > John Hawkins
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today!
> http://my.yahoo.com
>
>
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free!
http://my.yahoo.com
Re: SSL WSDL2Ws options
Posted by Samisa Abeysinghe <sa...@yahoo.com>.
I have seen this secure option in the code and I think they are no more operational.
There was an effort for SLL implementation in 1.0 (and may be in 1.1) and this option was for
that. But later this was deprecated by the new transport astract layer desing and this option is
no more valid with the new transport desing we have.
As the latest efforts on SSL support is independent of the generated code (which is the correct
way to support channel security) I think we can very safely get rid of this WSDL2Ws tool option.
Thanks,
Samisa...
--- John Hawkins <HA...@uk.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hi, does anyone know where these came from or what they do?
>
>
> John Hawkins
>
>
>
>
>
> John
> Hawkins/UK/IBM@IB
> MGB To
> axis-c-dev@ws.apache.org
> 16/11/2004 13:32 cc
>
> Subject
> Please respond to SSL WSDL2Ws options
> "Apache AXIS C
> Developers List"
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Folks,
> there are some options on WSDL2ws for ssl ->
>
> -c<none|ssl> channel security (ssl|none) - default is none
>
> What do they do? Why does a user have to decide at this time whether their
> service is securty enabled or not? Sounds wrong to me?
>
> cheers,
> John.
>
> John Hawkins
>
>
>
>
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today!
http://my.yahoo.com
Re: SSL WSDL2Ws options
Posted by John Hawkins <HA...@uk.ibm.com>.
Hi, does anyone know where these came from or what they do?
John Hawkins
John
Hawkins/UK/IBM@IB
MGB To
axis-c-dev@ws.apache.org
16/11/2004 13:32 cc
Subject
Please respond to SSL WSDL2Ws options
"Apache AXIS C
Developers List"
Hi Folks,
there are some options on WSDL2ws for ssl ->
-c<none|ssl> channel security (ssl|none) - default is none
What do they do? Why does a user have to decide at this time whether their
service is securty enabled or not? Sounds wrong to me?
cheers,
John.
John Hawkins