You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Jeremy Hanna (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/01/19 23:44:38 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-8150) Revaluate Default JVM tuning parameters

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14283112#comment-14283112 ] 

Jeremy Hanna commented on CASSANDRA-8150:
-----------------------------------------

Have we made any progress towards determining whether these are reasonable new defaults?  It sounds like there is good evidence suggesting they are good but that we are waiting on tests and perhaps some gc logs?

> Revaluate Default JVM tuning parameters
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-8150
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8150
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Config
>            Reporter: Matt Stump
>            Assignee: Brandon Williams
>         Attachments: upload.png
>
>
> It's been found that the old twitter recommendations of 100m per core up to 800m is harmful and should no longer be used.
> Instead the formula used should be 1/3 or 1/4 max heap with a max of 2G. 1/3 or 1/4 is debatable and I'm open to suggestions. If I were to hazard a guess 1/3 is probably better for releases greater than 2.1.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)