You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@turbine.apache.org by Daniel Rall <dl...@finemaltcoding.com> on 2002/04/01 18:40:02 UTC

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-turbine-maven/src/dtd project.dtd

Sounds good to me.

James Taylor <jt...@4lane.com> writes:

> Schema just allows more extensive validation and better support of XML
> (DTDS are pretty SGMLish). Some advantages are:
>
>         * Support for namespaces
>         * Rich datatype set (booleans, the usual set of numbers types,
>           dates, URIs, intervals, ...)
>         * User defined types.
>         * "Inheritence" which is really more like refinement.
>
> There's more, but basically XML schema is a better DTD. 
>
> On Fri, 2002-03-29 at 12:36, Daniel Rall wrote:
> > What's the benefit of XML schema?  I see the benefit of the DTD as
>> something which can immediatley be validated against, and which serves
>> as a description of the format of the XML file for developers.
>> 
>> James Taylor <jt...@4lane.com> writes:
>> 
>> > Possibly to support existing tools that only deal with DTD? 
>> >
>> > I'm in favor of using schema instead. For backward compatibility there
>> > are tools which can generate DTD from schema if we NEED to.
>> >
>> > On Fri, 2002-03-29 at 10:05, Warner Onstine wrote:
>> > > Just curious why we haven't moved to XML Schema yet =).

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>