Role of BaseTypeMappingRegistry in SymbolTable

[Dimuthu Leelarathne <mu...@vijayaba.cse.mrt.ac.lk>]

Hi all ,

In the problem of "Replace SchemaUtils/DOM with JaxMe's Schema Parser?"  I
have been studying how axis manage the schema stuff.

The method "addTypes(URL context, Node node, int level) " sets the
Type-information into the Symbol Table. I read through the code and figured
out this is where eventually parser.run would end up in.

My question is this. If "addTypes(URL context, Node node, int level) "
method handles all these things what does the SymbolTabel has to do with a
BaseTypeMappingRegistry.  A BaseTypeMappingRegistry is required in the
constructor of the SymbolTable.

I am really gratefull for any input.

Thank you,
Dimuthu.

Re: Role of BaseTypeMappingRegistry in SymbolTable

[Dimuthu Leelarathne <mu...@vijayaba.cse.mrt.ac.lk>]

Hi all,

I posted this message a day before and now I found an answer.

BaseTypeMappingRegistry is used for the purpose of checking whether it is a
type in the defaultTypeMappingRegistry. If the type is there no problem
because Serializers and Deserializers are inbuilt.

The answer was right under my nose.

Regards,
Dimuthu.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dimuthu Leelarathne" <mu...@vijayaba.cse.mrt.ac.lk>
To: <ax...@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 1:07 PM
Subject: Role of BaseTypeMappingRegistry in SymbolTable


> Hi all ,
>
> In the problem of "Replace SchemaUtils/DOM with JaxMe's Schema Parser?"  I
> have been studying how axis manage the schema stuff.
>
> The method "addTypes(URL context, Node node, int level) " sets the
> Type-information into the Symbol Table. I read through the code and
figured
> out this is where eventually parser.run would end up in.
>
> My question is this. If "addTypes(URL context, Node node, int level) "
> method handles all these things what does the SymbolTabel has to do with a
> BaseTypeMappingRegistry.  A BaseTypeMappingRegistry is required in the
> constructor of the SymbolTable.
>
> I am really gratefull for any input.
>
> Thank you,
> Dimuthu.
>
>
>