You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org> on 2005/06/02 04:11:04 UTC
3.1.0 prerelease?
OK, as far as I'm concerned, nothing in the 3.1.0 queue, apart from maybe
bug 4314, needs to be fixed before we can do a prerelease.
Should we set up a tracker bug for the prerelease, so we can add bugs
as deps to it without changing their milestones?
--j.
Re: 3.1.0 prerelease?
Posted by Theo Van Dinter <fe...@kluge.net>.
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 07:11:04PM -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
> OK, as far as I'm concerned, nothing in the 3.1.0 queue, apart from maybe
> bug 4314, needs to be fixed before we can do a prerelease.
Wow. We're down to 15.
Assuming 4310 is solved, I'm +1 for doing a prerelease. It'd be nice to do a
quick score generation run first though. It's be nice to make sure we have
our ducks in a row for the real run, but it'd also make the tests more useful
since the scores won't be so out of date.
> Should we set up a tracker bug for the prerelease, so we can add bugs
> as deps to it without changing their milestones?
I'm not too worried about it and would just it as the milestone.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
I'm used to seeing people promoted ahead of me -- friends, co-workers,
Tibor. I never thought it'd be my own wife.
-- Homer Simpson
Marge Gets A Job
Re: 3.1.0 prerelease?
Posted by Michael Parker <pa...@pobox.com>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Also, I'm randomly getting thiis sort of error in the spamc/spamd tests:
spamd start failed: log: [29808] dbg: logger: adding facilities: all
[29808] dbg: logger: logging level is DBG
[29808] dbg: spamd: creating INET socket:
[29808] dbg: spamd: _Listen: 128
[29808] dbg: spamd: _LocalAddr: 127.0.0.1
[29808] dbg: spamd: _LocalPort: 62572
[29808] dbg: spamd: _Proto: 6
[29808] dbg: spamd: _ReuseAddr: 1
[29808] dbg: spamd: _Type: 1
[29808] dbg: logger: adding facilities: all
[29808] dbg: logger: logging level is DBG
lots more debug and then this:
[29924] info: spamd: server started on port 62688/tcp (running version
3.1.0-r179480)
[29924] info: spamd: server successfully spawned child process, pid 29928
[29924] dbg: prefork: child 29928: entering state 0
[29928] dbg: prefork: sysread(7) not ready, wait max 300 secs
[29924] info: spamd: server successfully spawned child process, pid 29929
[29924] dbg: prefork: child 29929: entering state 0
[29929] dbg: prefork: sysread(8) not ready, wait max 300 secs
[29924] dbg: prefork: child 29928: entering state 1
[29924] dbg: prefork: child reports idle
[29924] dbg: prefork: child 29929: entering state 1
[29924] dbg: prefork: child reports idle
[29924] info: prefork: child states: II
This leaves a few perl/spamd processes around and other tests fail
after that.
Michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCnpLAG4km+uS4gOIRArHbAJ0Wfa8xT+JB85QTHOJT38rDwYCsEQCgqE3p
sslM8YQ0JTJcIFPyl5YGUVk=
=VSzT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: 3.1.0 prerelease?
Posted by Michael Parker <pa...@pobox.com>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 10:30:50PM -0500, Michael Parker wrote:
>
>> - -1 for pre-release, the mass number of commits today/tonight
>> has really destabilized the tree again. I'm seeing multiple test
>> failures and odd debugs from make test.
>
>
> Really? I get no "make test" errors on either my FC3 or Tiger
> boxes. I just tested with r179499.
>
See
http://buildbot.spamassassin.org:8010/t-parker-suse-9.2/builds/16/test/0
for an example.
Michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCnoV1G4km+uS4gOIRAqulAJ4zRvV67AO6MlvXmixIjhxrxleTswCfYyxm
1fMm6+6C2A5NUpnLmZzpnpU=
=yyDZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: 3.1.0 prerelease?
Posted by OpenMacNews <Op...@speakeasy.net>.
hi,
> bundled perl:
>
> vorlon:~ felicity$ perl -v
>
> This is perl, v5.8.6 built for darwin-thread-multi-2level
> (with 2 registered patches, see perl -V for more detail)
> [...]
> vorlon:~ felicity$ which perl
> /usr/bin/perl
and, per the bug rpt, my external build is:
% perl -v
This is perl, v5.8.6 built for darwin-thread-multi-2level
% perl -V
Summary of my perl5 (revision 5 version 8 subversion 6) configuration:
Platform:
osname=darwin, osvers=8.1.0, archname=darwin-thread-multi-2level
uname='darwin devbox 8.1.0 darwin kernel version 8.1.0: tue may 10
18:16:08 pdt 2005; root:xnu-792.1.5.obj~4release_ppc power macintosh powerpc '
...
argh.
somewhere in here is that $&^%& BusError i'm seeing ...
richard
(now where did i put that beer?)
Re: 3.1.0 prerelease?
Posted by Theo Van Dinter <fe...@kluge.net>.
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 08:53:49PM -0700, OpenMacNews wrote:
> curious, are you using apple's bundled perl, or your own build?
bundled perl:
vorlon:~ felicity$ perl -v
This is perl, v5.8.6 built for darwin-thread-multi-2level
(with 2 registered patches, see perl -V for more detail)
[...]
vorlon:~ felicity$ which perl
/usr/bin/perl
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
You can't depend on me all your lives. You have to learn that there's a
little Homer Simpson in all of us.
-- Homer Simpson
Homer Defined
Re: 3.1.0 prerelease?
Posted by OpenMacNews <Op...@speakeasy.net>.
hi theo,
>> - -1 for pre-release, the mass number of commits today/tonight has
>> really destabilized the tree again. I'm seeing multiple test failures
>> and odd debugs from make test.
>
> Really? I get no "make test" errors on either my FC3 or Tiger boxes. I just
> tested with r179499.
curious, are you using apple's bundled perl, or your own build?
richard
Re: 3.1.0 prerelease?
Posted by Theo Van Dinter <fe...@kluge.net>.
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 10:30:50PM -0500, Michael Parker wrote:
> - -1 for pre-release, the mass number of commits today/tonight has
> really destabilized the tree again. I'm seeing multiple test failures
> and odd debugs from make test.
Really? I get no "make test" errors on either my FC3 or Tiger boxes. I just
tested with r179499.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"The OSI hits! -more-
You are in a twisty maze of networking standards, all overengineered."
- Brandon Allbery
Re: 3.1.0 prerelease?
Posted by Michael Parker <pa...@pobox.com>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Justin Mason wrote:
> OK, as far as I'm concerned, nothing in the 3.1.0 queue, apart from
> maybe bug 4314, needs to be fixed before we can do a prerelease.
>
> Should we set up a tracker bug for the prerelease, so we can add
> bugs as deps to it without changing their milestones?
>
> --j.
>
- -1 for pre-release, the mass number of commits today/tonight has
really destabilized the tree again. I'm seeing multiple test failures
and odd debugs from make test.
Michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCnn1qG4km+uS4gOIRAiS4AJwPZkMBIjtlumeSTO4VBvAhFej7ngCeMCAG
KiLk1e6pDemEUXmbpHwvaVs=
=t0C8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----