You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Stack <st...@duboce.net> on 2010/04/29 07:59:01 UTC
Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 5!!! as
hbase-0.20.4?
I've posted an hbase 0.20.4 release candidate 5 here:
http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-5/
It includes a fix for the issue J-D found offlining big tables.
Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.4?
It includes critical fixes and some performance enhancements (See
CHANGES.txt or the release notes in the docs [1] for issues addressed
by this candidate).
Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance. Vote closes
Saturday, the 1st of May.
Yours,
Your HBase Team
1. http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-5/hbase-0.20.4/docs/releasenotes.html
Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 5!!! as
hbase-0.20.4?
Posted by Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>.
Hurray!
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> VOTE PASSES because 4x+1 && !-1s
> Let me publish RC5 as 0.20.4.
> Thanks to all who tested,
> St.Ack
>
> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I used the Import mapreduce to pull in 16GB of data and things looked fine.
>>
>> -ryan
>>
>> On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Loaded 1B using PE into 5node cluster. Did scans and reads. No
>>> noticeable issues. Downloaded it. Made sure it runs in local mode.
>>> Ran PE against it (I think the ZK disconnect WARN message cleaned up
>>> in zk 3.3). Doc looks fine.
>>>
>>> St.Ack
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>> +1, I ran a small data load overnight of about 1.2B rows (~88GB) on my 5
>>>> node cluster. Grepped logs for anything suspicious looking, everything looks
>>>> good.
>>>>
>>>> -Todd
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1: doc is good, passes unit tests, passes my own stress testing.
>>>>>
>>>>> J-D
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>>>> > I've posted an hbase 0.20.4 release candidate 5 here:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-5/
>>>>> >
>>>>> > It includes a fix for the issue J-D found offlining big tables.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.4?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > It includes critical fixes and some performance enhancements (See
>>>>> > CHANGES.txt or the release notes in the docs [1] for issues addressed
>>>>> > by this candidate).
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance. Vote closes
>>>>> > Saturday, the 1st of May.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Yours,
>>>>> > Your HBase Team
>>>>> >
>>>>> > 1.
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-5/hbase-0.20.4/docs/releasenotes.html
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Todd Lipcon
>>>> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 5!!! as
hbase-0.20.4?
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
Cancel that!
We just tripped over HBASE-2509.
Will cut a new RC after we have a fix.
St.Ack
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> VOTE PASSES because 4x+1 && !-1s
> Let me publish RC5 as 0.20.4.
> Thanks to all who tested,
> St.Ack
>
> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I used the Import mapreduce to pull in 16GB of data and things looked fine.
>>
>> -ryan
>>
>> On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Loaded 1B using PE into 5node cluster. Did scans and reads. No
>>> noticeable issues. Downloaded it. Made sure it runs in local mode.
>>> Ran PE against it (I think the ZK disconnect WARN message cleaned up
>>> in zk 3.3). Doc looks fine.
>>>
>>> St.Ack
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>> +1, I ran a small data load overnight of about 1.2B rows (~88GB) on my 5
>>>> node cluster. Grepped logs for anything suspicious looking, everything looks
>>>> good.
>>>>
>>>> -Todd
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1: doc is good, passes unit tests, passes my own stress testing.
>>>>>
>>>>> J-D
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>>>> > I've posted an hbase 0.20.4 release candidate 5 here:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-5/
>>>>> >
>>>>> > It includes a fix for the issue J-D found offlining big tables.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.4?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > It includes critical fixes and some performance enhancements (See
>>>>> > CHANGES.txt or the release notes in the docs [1] for issues addressed
>>>>> > by this candidate).
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance. Vote closes
>>>>> > Saturday, the 1st of May.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Yours,
>>>>> > Your HBase Team
>>>>> >
>>>>> > 1.
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-5/hbase-0.20.4/docs/releasenotes.html
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Todd Lipcon
>>>> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 5!!! as
hbase-0.20.4?
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
VOTE PASSES because 4x+1 && !-1s
Let me publish RC5 as 0.20.4.
Thanks to all who tested,
St.Ack
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I used the Import mapreduce to pull in 16GB of data and things looked fine.
>
> -ryan
>
> On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> Loaded 1B using PE into 5node cluster. Did scans and reads. No
>> noticeable issues. Downloaded it. Made sure it runs in local mode.
>> Ran PE against it (I think the ZK disconnect WARN message cleaned up
>> in zk 3.3). Doc looks fine.
>>
>> St.Ack
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>> +1, I ran a small data load overnight of about 1.2B rows (~88GB) on my 5
>>> node cluster. Grepped logs for anything suspicious looking, everything looks
>>> good.
>>>
>>> -Todd
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1: doc is good, passes unit tests, passes my own stress testing.
>>>>
>>>> J-D
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>>> > I've posted an hbase 0.20.4 release candidate 5 here:
>>>> >
>>>> > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-5/
>>>> >
>>>> > It includes a fix for the issue J-D found offlining big tables.
>>>> >
>>>> > Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.4?
>>>> >
>>>> > It includes critical fixes and some performance enhancements (See
>>>> > CHANGES.txt or the release notes in the docs [1] for issues addressed
>>>> > by this candidate).
>>>> >
>>>> > Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance. Vote closes
>>>> > Saturday, the 1st of May.
>>>> >
>>>> > Yours,
>>>> > Your HBase Team
>>>> >
>>>> > 1.
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-5/hbase-0.20.4/docs/releasenotes.html
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Todd Lipcon
>>> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 5!!! as
hbase-0.20.4?
Posted by Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com>.
I used the Import mapreduce to pull in 16GB of data and things looked fine.
-ryan
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> +1
>
> Loaded 1B using PE into 5node cluster. Did scans and reads. No
> noticeable issues. Downloaded it. Made sure it runs in local mode.
> Ran PE against it (I think the ZK disconnect WARN message cleaned up
> in zk 3.3). Doc looks fine.
>
> St.Ack
>
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> +1, I ran a small data load overnight of about 1.2B rows (~88GB) on my 5
>> node cluster. Grepped logs for anything suspicious looking, everything looks
>> good.
>>
>> -Todd
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>wrote:
>>
>>> +1: doc is good, passes unit tests, passes my own stress testing.
>>>
>>> J-D
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>> > I've posted an hbase 0.20.4 release candidate 5 here:
>>> >
>>> > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-5/
>>> >
>>> > It includes a fix for the issue J-D found offlining big tables.
>>> >
>>> > Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.4?
>>> >
>>> > It includes critical fixes and some performance enhancements (See
>>> > CHANGES.txt or the release notes in the docs [1] for issues addressed
>>> > by this candidate).
>>> >
>>> > Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance. Vote closes
>>> > Saturday, the 1st of May.
>>> >
>>> > Yours,
>>> > Your HBase Team
>>> >
>>> > 1.
>>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-5/hbase-0.20.4/docs/releasenotes.html
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Todd Lipcon
>> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 5!!! as
hbase-0.20.4?
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
+1
Loaded 1B using PE into 5node cluster. Did scans and reads. No
noticeable issues. Downloaded it. Made sure it runs in local mode.
Ran PE against it (I think the ZK disconnect WARN message cleaned up
in zk 3.3). Doc looks fine.
St.Ack
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> +1, I ran a small data load overnight of about 1.2B rows (~88GB) on my 5
> node cluster. Grepped logs for anything suspicious looking, everything looks
> good.
>
> -Todd
>
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>wrote:
>
>> +1: doc is good, passes unit tests, passes my own stress testing.
>>
>> J-D
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>> > I've posted an hbase 0.20.4 release candidate 5 here:
>> >
>> > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-5/
>> >
>> > It includes a fix for the issue J-D found offlining big tables.
>> >
>> > Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.4?
>> >
>> > It includes critical fixes and some performance enhancements (See
>> > CHANGES.txt or the release notes in the docs [1] for issues addressed
>> > by this candidate).
>> >
>> > Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance. Vote closes
>> > Saturday, the 1st of May.
>> >
>> > Yours,
>> > Your HBase Team
>> >
>> > 1.
>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-5/hbase-0.20.4/docs/releasenotes.html
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Todd Lipcon
> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>
Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 5!!! as
hbase-0.20.4?
Posted by Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com>.
+1, I ran a small data load overnight of about 1.2B rows (~88GB) on my 5
node cluster. Grepped logs for anything suspicious looking, everything looks
good.
-Todd
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>wrote:
> +1: doc is good, passes unit tests, passes my own stress testing.
>
> J-D
>
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> > I've posted an hbase 0.20.4 release candidate 5 here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-5/
> >
> > It includes a fix for the issue J-D found offlining big tables.
> >
> > Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.4?
> >
> > It includes critical fixes and some performance enhancements (See
> > CHANGES.txt or the release notes in the docs [1] for issues addressed
> > by this candidate).
> >
> > Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance. Vote closes
> > Saturday, the 1st of May.
> >
> > Yours,
> > Your HBase Team
> >
> > 1.
> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-5/hbase-0.20.4/docs/releasenotes.html
> >
>
--
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera
Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 5!!! as
hbase-0.20.4?
Posted by Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>.
+1: doc is good, passes unit tests, passes my own stress testing.
J-D
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> I've posted an hbase 0.20.4 release candidate 5 here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-5/
>
> It includes a fix for the issue J-D found offlining big tables.
>
> Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.4?
>
> It includes critical fixes and some performance enhancements (See
> CHANGES.txt or the release notes in the docs [1] for issues addressed
> by this candidate).
>
> Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance. Vote closes
> Saturday, the 1st of May.
>
> Yours,
> Your HBase Team
>
> 1. http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-5/hbase-0.20.4/docs/releasenotes.html
>