You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by 谢良 <xi...@xiaomi.com> on 2012/08/30 09:49:18 UTC

About slf4j usage

Hi,

Seems we use an suboptimal logging pattern currently, it's better to use parameterized feature per slf4j manual: http://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#logging_performance.

Thanks,
Liang

答复: About slf4j usage

Posted by 谢良 <xi...@xiaomi.com>.

np, i am glad to do :)
________________________________________
发件人: saint.ack@gmail.com [saint.ack@gmail.com] 代表 Stack [stack@duboce.net]
发送时间: 2012年8月31日 6:47
到: dev@hbase.apache.org
主题: Re: About slf4j usage

On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:49 AM, 谢良 <xi...@xiaomi.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Seems we use an suboptimal logging pattern currently, it's better to use parameterized feature per slf4j manual: http://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#logging_performance.
>

Want to try making a patch?
Thanks,
St.Ack

Re: About slf4j usage

Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.

On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:49 AM, 谢良 <xi...@xiaomi.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Seems we use an suboptimal logging pattern currently, it's better to use parameterized feature per slf4j manual: http://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#logging_performance.
>

Want to try making a patch?
Thanks,
St.Ack