You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by "Timothy Bish (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/07/13 13:47:00 UTC

[jira] Reopened: (AMQCPP-176) Work around Visual Studio .NET 2003 covariant return issues

     [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Timothy Bish reopened AMQCPP-176:
---------------------------------

      Assignee: Timothy Bish  (was: Nathan Mittler)

Should not have been closed

> Work around Visual Studio .NET 2003 covariant return issues
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQCPP-176
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-176
>             Project: ActiveMQ C++ Client
>          Issue Type: Wish
>            Reporter: Albert Strasheim
>            Assignee: Timothy Bish
>             Fix For: 2.2.1
>
>
> It would be very useful if something could be done in the AMQCPP code to work around the issues Visual Studio .NET 2003 has with having base classes with virtual functions as covariant return types.
> These problems are alluded to here:
> http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=23760&SiteID=1
> Some ideas have been discussed here:
> http://www.nabble.com/Unable-to-comile-C%2B%2B-client-on-VC%2B%2B-2003-td14680479s2354.html
> but I'm hoping there might be a way to slightly restructure the AMQCPP code instead of resorting to preprocessor directives.
> Any ideas I could try would be much appreciated.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.