You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> on 2007/11/05 18:57:53 UTC
Moving wsdl2java to SDO project? was: Moving tool modules under java/sca/tools/
ant elder wrote:
> On 10/28/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> We currently have a bunch of tools modules under sca/modules.
>>
>> I'm thinking about moving them to sca/tools as follows:
>> sca/tools/wsdl2java
>> sca/tools/java2wsdl
>> sca/tools/maven/maven-wsdl2java
>> sca/tools/maven/maven-java2wsdl
>> sca/tools/maven/maven-ant-generator
>>
>> I think it'll better reflect that they are tools and not runtime and
>> it'll also help build them before the runtime modules which depend on
>> them.
>>
>> If there's no objection I'd like to do this sometime next week.
>>
>
>
> Are the wsdl tools even sca specific?
Yes, here's a Java interface generated from WSDL:
package org.apache.tuscany.implementation.bpel.example.helloworld;
import org.osoa.sca.annotations.Remotable;
/*
* HelloPortType java interface
*/
@Remotable
public interface HelloPortType {
/**
* Auto generated method signatures
* @param hello
*/
public java.lang.String hello(
java.lang.String hello) ;
//
}
> wsdl2java doesn't even mention sca at
> all in the pom.xml only sdo, maybe they should be part of the sdo project?
>
I think they should stay in SCA, but I changed the subject to include
SDO to let the SDO folks speak up.
> ...ant
>
>
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Moving wsdl2java to SDO project? was: Moving tool modules under java/sca/tools/
Posted by Fuhwei Lwo <fu...@bricemedia.com>.
I think wsdl2java tool needs to stay in SCA because it's used to generate SCA service interface which SDO has no knowledge about.
Fuhwei Lwo
Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> wrote: ant elder wrote:
> On 10/28/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
>
>> We currently have a bunch of tools modules under sca/modules.
>>
>> I'm thinking about moving them to sca/tools as follows:
>> sca/tools/wsdl2java
>> sca/tools/java2wsdl
>> sca/tools/maven/maven-wsdl2java
>> sca/tools/maven/maven-java2wsdl
>> sca/tools/maven/maven-ant-generator
>>
>> I think it'll better reflect that they are tools and not runtime and
>> it'll also help build them before the runtime modules which depend on
>> them.
>>
>> If there's no objection I'd like to do this sometime next week.
>>
>
>
> Are the wsdl tools even sca specific?
Yes, here's a Java interface generated from WSDL:
package org.apache.tuscany.implementation.bpel.example.helloworld;
import org.osoa.sca.annotations.Remotable;
/*
* HelloPortType java interface
*/
@Remotable
public interface HelloPortType {
/**
* Auto generated method signatures
* @param hello
*/
public java.lang.String hello(
java.lang.String hello) ;
//
}
> wsdl2java doesn't even mention sca at
> all in the pom.xml only sdo, maybe they should be part of the sdo project?
>
I think they should stay in SCA, but I changed the subject to include
SDO to let the SDO folks speak up.
> ...ant
>
>
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org