Components with stale websites: candidates for dormant?

[sebb <se...@gmail.com>]

The following components all have stale websites (e.g. still link to
SVN), and no recent releases.

This makes me wonder if they should be classed as dormant:

digester
functor
jci
jelly
ognl
proxy

Sebb.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org

Re: Components with stale websites: candidates for dormant?

["Bruno P. Kinoshita" <ki...@apache.org>]

 Haven't used nor had the need to contribute to any of these. I thought I'd be able to work on functor, but I think I'll be working on Imaging for the rest of the year.

Out of these, I think the last ones I used were digester and jelly. I think Jenkins uses Jelly, and I **think** they stopped using forked libraries. So maybe they are using Jelly but without needing any new features or bug fixes. Can be moved back to proper if a release/work is necessary, so +1

Thanks

Bruno


    On Friday, 23 April 2021, 11:07:24 pm NZST, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:  
 
 The following components all have stale websites (e.g. still link to
SVN), and no recent releases.

This makes me wonder if they should be classed as dormant:

digester
functor
jci
jelly
ognl
proxy

Sebb.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org