You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com> on 2012/12/06 00:19:48 UTC

Re: Plans for asynchbase re:96

What's the status on this thread? Did you guys ever sit together?

-n

On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:

> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 11:11 PM, tsuna <ts...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ...
> > I want to have asynchbase speak PB to 0.96, while maintaining
> > compatibility with previous versions of HBase.  I haven't closely
> > followed the state of things in 0.96, but if things are deemed stable
> > in 0.96 (as in: no more significant change to the protocol) it's
> > worthwhile to start looking at integrating support for the new
> > protocol in asynchbase.
> >
>
> I'd say wait till we branch Benoit... then lets sit together so can
> save you some headache figuring whats going on.
>
> Go easy,
> St.Ack
>

Re: Plans for asynchbase re:96

Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.

On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Nick Dimiduk <nd...@gmail.com> wrote:

> What's the status on this thread? Did you guys ever sit together?
>
>
Not that I know of.  We need to finish our pb'ing before we go visit the
tsuna (looks like -ROOT- will be gone before 0.96 ships too.. .and that
should be basically in place before we tackle asynchbasing connection).

St.Ack