You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Graham Leggett <mi...@sharp.fm> on 2018/10/10 17:11:40 UTC
Re: svn commit: r1834924 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
On 28 Aug 2018, at 12:17, Ruediger Pluem <rp...@apache.org> wrote:
>> On 07/20/2018 02:49 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>> Ping, any objection if I commit this and add it to the backport proposal?
>>
>> Hmm. Looks like MODSSL_ERROR_BAD_GATEWAY is only used when the proxy connects to the backend.
>> So the patch should be fine.
>
>
> Do you want to commit and update the backport proposal?
Quick ping, are you happy with the updated proposal?
Regards,
Graham
—
AW: svn commit: r1834924 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Posted by Plüm,
Rüdiger,
Vodafone Group <ru...@vodafone.com>.
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Graham Leggett <mi...@sharp.fm>
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Oktober 2018 19:12
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1834924 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
>
> On 28 Aug 2018, at 12:17, Ruediger Pluem <rp...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> >> On 07/20/2018 02:49 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> >>> Ping, any objection if I commit this and add it to the backport
> proposal?
> >>
> >> Hmm. Looks like MODSSL_ERROR_BAD_GATEWAY is only used when the proxy
> connects to the backend.
> >> So the patch should be fine.
> >
> >
> > Do you want to commit and update the backport proposal?
>
> Quick ping, are you happy with the updated proposal?
Fine now. r18843533
Regards
Rüdiger