[jira] [Resolved] (CXF-5702) CXF 3.0 ApplicationPath issue with JAX-RS

["Sergey Beryozkin (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-5702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Sergey Beryozkin resolved CXF-5702.
-----------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 3.0.0
         Assignee: Sergey Beryozkin

You are right, ApplicationPath needs to be ignored by default

> CXF 3.0 ApplicationPath issue with JAX-RS
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-5702
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-5702
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JAX-RS
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0-milestone2
>         Environment: Windows
>            Reporter: Kou, Zhi Qiang
>            Assignee: Sergey Beryozkin
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>
> It seems CXF JAX-RS implementation has something wrong with the relationship between defined servlet-mapping and the value of ApplicationPath annotation.
> From JSR-339 spec, section 2.3.2: If the Application subclass is annotated with @ApplicationPath, implementations are REQUIRED to use the value of this annotation appended with ”/*” to define a mapping for the added server. Otherwise, the application MUST be packaged with a web.xml that specifies a servlet mapping.
> Also from ApplicationPath javadoc:
> Identifies the application path that serves as the base URI for all resource URIs provided by Path. May only be applied to a subclass of Application. *When published in a Servlet container, the value of the application path may be overridden using a servlet-mapping element in the web.xml.*
> https://jsr311.java.net/nonav/javadoc/javax/ws/rs/ApplicationPath.html
> From above information, if both servlet-mapping in web.xml and ApplicationPath has value, only one of them should be used as the base URI, and it should be the value of servlet-mapping in web.xml.
> In my application, my web.xml looks like below. There are two servlet defined, each for one jaxrs application. And the servlet-mapping values are defined as "/first/" and "/second/".
> {quote}
> 	<servlet>
> 		<servlet-name>rest1</servlet-name>
> 		<servlet-class>org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.servlet.CXFNonSpringJaxrsServlet</servlet-class>
> 		<init-param>
> 			<param-name>javax.ws.rs.Application</param-name>
> 			<param-value>com.ibm.sample.jaxrs.UserDemoApplication</param-value>
> 		</init-param>
> 	</servlet>
> 	<servlet>
> 		<servlet-name>rest2</servlet-name>
> 		<servlet-class>org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.servlet.CXFNonSpringJaxrsServlet</servlet-class>
> 		<init-param>
> 			<param-name>javax.ws.rs.Application</param-name>
> 			<param-value>com.ibm.sample.jaxrs.GroupDemoApplication</param-value>
> 		</init-param>
> 	</servlet>
> 	<servlet-mapping>
> 		<servlet-name>rest1</servlet-name>
> 		<url-pattern>/first/*</url-pattern>
> 	</servlet-mapping>
> 	<servlet-mapping>
> 		<servlet-name>rest2</servlet-name>
> 		<url-pattern>/second/*</url-pattern>
> 	</servlet-mapping>
> {quote}
> And in my application classes:
> {quote}
> @ApplicationPath("userdemo")
> public class UserDemoApplication extends javax.ws.rs.core.Application {
> @ApplicationPath("groupdemo")
> public class GroupDemoApplication extends javax.ws.rs.core.Application {
> {quote}
> So in this case according to spec and javadoc, "/first/" and "/second/" should be used as the base URI, but not the "userdemo" and "groupdemo" or BOTH.
> But in my CXF application I can only access the resources via URLs:
> http://localhost:9080/SingleParameterCxf/first/userdemo/users/eric
> http://localhost:9080/SingleParameterCxf/second/groupdemo/groups/root
> However if I implement the same application using Jersey RI libs, I can access my resources via URLs:
> http://localhost:9080/SingleParameterJersey/first/users/eric
> http://localhost:9080/SingleParameterJersey/second/groups/root
> My feeling is Jersey RI implementation is correct behavior according to SPEC and JavaDoc. Please let me know if my understanding is correct or not.
> Any help is highly appreciated! Thank you!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)