You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@druid.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2020/10/17 16:29:56 UTC

[GitHub] [druid] dylwylie commented on a change in pull request #10503: Additional documentation for query caching

dylwylie commented on a change in pull request #10503:
URL: https://github.com/apache/druid/pull/10503#discussion_r506959628



##########
File path: docs/querying/caching.md
##########
@@ -82,3 +82,19 @@ Note that the task executor processes only support caches that keep their data l
 This restriction exists because the cache stores results at the level of intermediate partial segments generated by the
 ingestion tasks. These intermediate partial segments will not necessarily be identical across task replicas, so
 remote cache types such as `memcached` will be ignored by task executor processes.
+
+## Unsupported queries
+
+Query caching is not available for following:
+- Queries, that involve a `union` datasource, do not support result-level caching. Refer to the 
+[related github issue](https://github.com/apache/druid/issues/8713) for details. Top level union SQL queries can still 
+be cached at result-level since they are not translated into a `union` datasource. Refer to [Union SQL](sql.md#UNION ALL) 
+for more details on how union SQL queries work.
+- Queries, that involve an `Inline` datasource or a `Lookup` datasource, do not support any caching. 
+- Queries, with a sub-query in them, do not support any caching though the output of sub-queries itself may be cached. 
+Refer to the [Query execution](query-execution.md#query) page for more details on how sub-queries are executed.
+- Join queries do not support any caching on the broker [More details](https://github.com/apache/druid/issues/10444).
+- GroupBy v2 queries do not support any caching on broker [More details](https://github.com/apache/druid/issues/3820).

Review comment:
       The linked issue only refers to segment-level caching.
   
   I could be wrong but I believe GroupBy V2 does support results-level caching?




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@druid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-help@druid.apache.org