You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Stack <st...@duboce.net> on 2013/08/15 23:25:21 UTC
VOTE: hbase-0.95.2 release candidate 0 is available for download
Here is our first 0.95.2 release candidate. Should we put this out as 0.95.
2?
Since 0.95.2 is a "Development" Series release [1], so lets keep the vote
period short. Please vote by this Monday, August 19th. The release has to
just basically "work".
The release artifacts may be downloaded from:
http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.2RC0/
~340 issues have been closed since we put out 0.95.1 [2].
All feedback is welcome. We'd be interested in getting comments on
everything from the packaging, layout, through documentation, UI, and of
course,
any bugs found. I deployed to maven [3] and would particularly like
to hear from downstream projects on whether our maven packaging is
palatable.
This is the last in the 0.95 series of development releases. You can think
of this
release as a 0.96.0-beta. No more features will come in on the 0.95
branch. Only
fixes and polish are allowed from here on out. I intend to branch 0.96
from 0.95
branch next week and put up a 0.96.0RC0 soon after.
Thanks,
St.Ack
1. http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hbase.versioning
2.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.95.2%22%20AND%20project%20%3D%20HBASE%20ORDER%20BY%20issuetype%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
3.
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/hbase/hbase/
Re: VOTE: hbase-0.95.2 release candidate 0 is available for download
Posted by Elliott Clark <ec...@apache.org>.
+1 downloaded and ran lots of tests.
Lots of issues were filed and fixed but for a developer release
nothing was a blocker.
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <jo...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>> +1.
>>
>> I tested the hadoop2 buid on on cdh 4.0.1 hadoop2, using the snapshot
>> testing rig I setup when hardening the feature..
>>
>> It runs an performance evaluation adding data to a table while online
>> snapshotting that table and cloning it. It seems happy. :)
>>
>
> Thanks Jon,
> St.Ack
Re: VOTE: hbase-0.95.2 release candidate 0 is available for download
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <jo...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> +1.
>
> I tested the hadoop2 buid on on cdh 4.0.1 hadoop2, using the snapshot
> testing rig I setup when hardening the feature..
>
> It runs an performance evaluation adding data to a table while online
> snapshotting that table and cloning it. It seems happy. :)
>
Thanks Jon,
St.Ack
Re: VOTE: hbase-0.95.2 release candidate 0 is available for download
Posted by Jonathan Hsieh <jo...@cloudera.com>.
+1.
I tested the hadoop2 buid on on cdh 4.0.1 hadoop2, using the snapshot
testing rig I setup when hardening the feature..
It runs an performance evaluation adding data to a table while online
snapshotting that table and cloning it. It seems happy. :)
Jon.
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> Thanks JD.
>
> I'm +1 too so thats enough votes to push this out.
>
> (I already pushed the maven bits out as a release by mistake -- so let me
> put up the tarball to suit).
>
> St.Ack
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jdcryans@apache.org
> >wrote:
>
> > I'm +1 on this release but there are definitely things we need to fix for
> > 0.96:
> >
> > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9267"StochasticLoadBalancer
> > goes over its processing time limit"
> >
> > I guess this has been present for a while, but it seems to imply you
> can't
> > let a clusters run for too long, not even two days. Elliott says he
> doesn't
> > see it on his IT cluster because he resets it every 12 hours and he runs
> a
> > chaos monkey.
> >
> > Running a chaos monkey on the master on long running clusters might not
> be
> > a bad idea.
> >
> > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9268 "Client doesn't
> recover
> > from a stalled region server"
> >
> > This one I don't fully understand yet and I'm working on it more this
> > afternoon, I thought it was a lack of SocketTimeout but it seems to be
> > getting them but not refreshing from .META.
> >
> > J-D
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Here is our first 0.95.2 release candidate. Should we put this out as
> > > 0.95.
> > > 2?
> > >
> > > Since 0.95.2 is a "Development" Series release [1], so lets keep the
> vote
> > > period short. Please vote by this Monday, August 19th. The release
> has
> > to
> > > just basically "work".
> > >
> > > The release artifacts may be downloaded from:
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.2RC0/
> > >
> > > ~340 issues have been closed since we put out 0.95.1 [2].
> > >
> > > All feedback is welcome. We'd be interested in getting comments on
> > > everything from the packaging, layout, through documentation, UI, and
> of
> > > course,
> > > any bugs found. I deployed to maven [3] and would particularly like
> > > to hear from downstream projects on whether our maven packaging is
> > > palatable.
> > >
> > > This is the last in the 0.95 series of development releases. You can
> > think
> > > of this
> > > release as a 0.96.0-beta. No more features will come in on the 0.95
> > > branch. Only
> > > fixes and polish are allowed from here on out. I intend to branch 0.96
> > > from 0.95
> > > branch next week and put up a 0.96.0RC0 soon after.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > St.Ack
> > >
> > > 1. http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hbase.versioning
> > > 2.
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.95.2%22%20AND%20project%20%3D%20HBASE%20ORDER%20BY%20issuetype%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
> > > 3.
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/hbase/hbase/
> > >
> >
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
// jon@cloudera.com
Re: VOTE: hbase-0.95.2 release candidate 0 is available for download
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
Thanks JD.
I'm +1 too so thats enough votes to push this out.
(I already pushed the maven bits out as a release by mistake -- so let me
put up the tarball to suit).
St.Ack
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>wrote:
> I'm +1 on this release but there are definitely things we need to fix for
> 0.96:
>
> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9267 "StochasticLoadBalancer
> goes over its processing time limit"
>
> I guess this has been present for a while, but it seems to imply you can't
> let a clusters run for too long, not even two days. Elliott says he doesn't
> see it on his IT cluster because he resets it every 12 hours and he runs a
> chaos monkey.
>
> Running a chaos monkey on the master on long running clusters might not be
> a bad idea.
>
> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9268 "Client doesn't recover
> from a stalled region server"
>
> This one I don't fully understand yet and I'm working on it more this
> afternoon, I thought it was a lack of SocketTimeout but it seems to be
> getting them but not refreshing from .META.
>
> J-D
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> > Here is our first 0.95.2 release candidate. Should we put this out as
> > 0.95.
> > 2?
> >
> > Since 0.95.2 is a "Development" Series release [1], so lets keep the vote
> > period short. Please vote by this Monday, August 19th. The release has
> to
> > just basically "work".
> >
> > The release artifacts may be downloaded from:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.2RC0/
> >
> > ~340 issues have been closed since we put out 0.95.1 [2].
> >
> > All feedback is welcome. We'd be interested in getting comments on
> > everything from the packaging, layout, through documentation, UI, and of
> > course,
> > any bugs found. I deployed to maven [3] and would particularly like
> > to hear from downstream projects on whether our maven packaging is
> > palatable.
> >
> > This is the last in the 0.95 series of development releases. You can
> think
> > of this
> > release as a 0.96.0-beta. No more features will come in on the 0.95
> > branch. Only
> > fixes and polish are allowed from here on out. I intend to branch 0.96
> > from 0.95
> > branch next week and put up a 0.96.0RC0 soon after.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > St.Ack
> >
> > 1. http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hbase.versioning
> > 2.
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.95.2%22%20AND%20project%20%3D%20HBASE%20ORDER%20BY%20issuetype%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
> > 3.
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/hbase/hbase/
> >
>
Re: VOTE: hbase-0.95.2 release candidate 0 is available for download
Posted by Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>.
I'm +1 on this release but there are definitely things we need to fix for
0.96:
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9267 "StochasticLoadBalancer
goes over its processing time limit"
I guess this has been present for a while, but it seems to imply you can't
let a clusters run for too long, not even two days. Elliott says he doesn't
see it on his IT cluster because he resets it every 12 hours and he runs a
chaos monkey.
Running a chaos monkey on the master on long running clusters might not be
a bad idea.
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9268 "Client doesn't recover
from a stalled region server"
This one I don't fully understand yet and I'm working on it more this
afternoon, I thought it was a lack of SocketTimeout but it seems to be
getting them but not refreshing from .META.
J-D
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> Here is our first 0.95.2 release candidate. Should we put this out as
> 0.95.
> 2?
>
> Since 0.95.2 is a "Development" Series release [1], so lets keep the vote
> period short. Please vote by this Monday, August 19th. The release has to
> just basically "work".
>
> The release artifacts may be downloaded from:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.2RC0/
>
> ~340 issues have been closed since we put out 0.95.1 [2].
>
> All feedback is welcome. We'd be interested in getting comments on
> everything from the packaging, layout, through documentation, UI, and of
> course,
> any bugs found. I deployed to maven [3] and would particularly like
> to hear from downstream projects on whether our maven packaging is
> palatable.
>
> This is the last in the 0.95 series of development releases. You can think
> of this
> release as a 0.96.0-beta. No more features will come in on the 0.95
> branch. Only
> fixes and polish are allowed from here on out. I intend to branch 0.96
> from 0.95
> branch next week and put up a 0.96.0RC0 soon after.
>
> Thanks,
> St.Ack
>
> 1. http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hbase.versioning
> 2.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.95.2%22%20AND%20project%20%3D%20HBASE%20ORDER%20BY%20issuetype%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
> 3.
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/hbase/hbase/
>
Re: VOTE: hbase-0.95.2 release candidate 0 is available for download
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
Disregard earlier mail. Patch on issue. Adds some coverage to TestShell for
this.
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>wrote:
> That's not a namespaces issue per se, that's something introduced by the
> new list tables API.
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: VOTE: hbase-0.95.2 release candidate 0 is available for download
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
That's not a namespaces issue per se, that's something introduced by the
new list tables API. In 0.94, it returns table names as String. Originally
I did it that way for 0.95/0.96 but TableName is used for other name
related APIs, so was inconsistent, so I changed it. I did not notice the
breakage and we don't have coverage for that in TestShell. In this case I
think we should relax the check in TableName because system table names can
have "illegal" characters. Or, I can have the list tables API in 0.95/0.96
return String like 0.94.
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Devaraj Das <dd...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> Basics worked fine. I raised
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9251 for a namespace issue.
> Not
> sure how much weight do we want to put in on this one for the RC
> validation..
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Sergey Shelukhin <sergey@hortonworks.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Given that this can potentially be the base release for 96, should we
> > wait for HBASE-8165 (protobuf upgrade to 2.5) to go in?
> > Hadoop 2.1.0-beta release vote is currently ongoing.
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> > > Here is our first 0.95.2 release candidate. Should we put this out as
> > 0.95.
> > > 2?
> > >
> > > Since 0.95.2 is a "Development" Series release [1], so lets keep the
> vote
> > > period short. Please vote by this Monday, August 19th. The release
> has
> > to
> > > just basically "work".
> > >
> > > The release artifacts may be downloaded from:
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.2RC0/
> > >
> > > ~340 issues have been closed since we put out 0.95.1 [2].
> > >
> > > All feedback is welcome. We'd be interested in getting comments on
> > > everything from the packaging, layout, through documentation, UI, and
> of
> > > course,
> > > any bugs found. I deployed to maven [3] and would particularly like
> > > to hear from downstream projects on whether our maven packaging is
> > > palatable.
> > >
> > > This is the last in the 0.95 series of development releases. You can
> > think
> > > of this
> > > release as a 0.96.0-beta. No more features will come in on the 0.95
> > > branch. Only
> > > fixes and polish are allowed from here on out. I intend to branch 0.96
> > > from 0.95
> > > branch next week and put up a 0.96.0RC0 soon after.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > St.Ack
> > >
> > > 1. http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hbase.versioning
> > > 2.
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.95.2%22%20AND%20project%20%3D%20HBASE%20ORDER%20BY%20issuetype%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
> > > 3.
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/hbase/hbase/
> >
> > --
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity
> to
> > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> that
> > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> immediately
> > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> >
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: VOTE: hbase-0.95.2 release candidate 0 is available for download
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Arun C Murthy <ac...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> Stack - you guys planning on pulling in the move to protobuf-2.5 into
> this? Thanks.
If so, we should have another point release that targets Hadoop 2.1.x. If I
change the build to use a 2.1 SNAPSHOT, there are a bunch of new test
failures, looks like just about anything that touches MR is broken.
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: VOTE: hbase-0.95.2 release candidate 0 is available for download
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Arun C Murthy <ac...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> Stack - you guys planning on pulling in the move to protobuf-2.5 into
> this? Thanks.
>
>
Not into 'this' Mighty Arun but into a later release -- the actual 0.96.0RC
or it looks like folks are rumbling about a possible 0.95.3.
It looks like the pb stuff is fine but as Andrew says, 2.1.0-beta RC breaks
a bunch of unit tests; investigating.
St.Ack
Re: VOTE: hbase-0.95.2 release candidate 0 is available for download
Posted by Arun C Murthy <ac...@hortonworks.com>.
Stack - you guys planning on pulling in the move to protobuf-2.5 into this? Thanks.
On Aug 17, 2013, at 4:38 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Devaraj Das <dd...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
>> Basics worked fine. I raised
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9251 for a namespace issue.
>> Not
>> sure how much weight do we want to put in on this one for the RC
>> validation..
>>
>>
> Thanks for taking it for a spin DD. I'd say HBASE-9251 is not a blocker.
> Lets fix in 0.96.
> St.Ack
--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Thank You.
Re: VOTE: hbase-0.95.2 release candidate 0 is available for download
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Devaraj Das <dd...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> Basics worked fine. I raised
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9251 for a namespace issue.
> Not
> sure how much weight do we want to put in on this one for the RC
> validation..
>
>
Thanks for taking it for a spin DD. I'd say HBASE-9251 is not a blocker.
Lets fix in 0.96.
St.Ack
Re: VOTE: hbase-0.95.2 release candidate 0 is available for download
Posted by Devaraj Das <dd...@hortonworks.com>.
Basics worked fine. I raised
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9251 for a namespace issue. Not
sure how much weight do we want to put in on this one for the RC
validation..
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Sergey Shelukhin <se...@hortonworks.com>wrote:
> Given that this can potentially be the base release for 96, should we
> wait for HBASE-8165 (protobuf upgrade to 2.5) to go in?
> Hadoop 2.1.0-beta release vote is currently ongoing.
>
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> > Here is our first 0.95.2 release candidate. Should we put this out as
> 0.95.
> > 2?
> >
> > Since 0.95.2 is a "Development" Series release [1], so lets keep the vote
> > period short. Please vote by this Monday, August 19th. The release has
> to
> > just basically "work".
> >
> > The release artifacts may be downloaded from:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.2RC0/
> >
> > ~340 issues have been closed since we put out 0.95.1 [2].
> >
> > All feedback is welcome. We'd be interested in getting comments on
> > everything from the packaging, layout, through documentation, UI, and of
> > course,
> > any bugs found. I deployed to maven [3] and would particularly like
> > to hear from downstream projects on whether our maven packaging is
> > palatable.
> >
> > This is the last in the 0.95 series of development releases. You can
> think
> > of this
> > release as a 0.96.0-beta. No more features will come in on the 0.95
> > branch. Only
> > fixes and polish are allowed from here on out. I intend to branch 0.96
> > from 0.95
> > branch next week and put up a 0.96.0RC0 soon after.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > St.Ack
> >
> > 1. http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hbase.versioning
> > 2.
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.95.2%22%20AND%20project%20%3D%20HBASE%20ORDER%20BY%20issuetype%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
> > 3.
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/hbase/hbase/
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Thank You.
Re: VOTE: hbase-0.95.2 release candidate 0 is available for download
Posted by Sergey Shelukhin <se...@hortonworks.com>.
Given that this can potentially be the base release for 96, should we
wait for HBASE-8165 (protobuf upgrade to 2.5) to go in?
Hadoop 2.1.0-beta release vote is currently ongoing.
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> Here is our first 0.95.2 release candidate. Should we put this out as 0.95.
> 2?
>
> Since 0.95.2 is a "Development" Series release [1], so lets keep the vote
> period short. Please vote by this Monday, August 19th. The release has to
> just basically "work".
>
> The release artifacts may be downloaded from:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.2RC0/
>
> ~340 issues have been closed since we put out 0.95.1 [2].
>
> All feedback is welcome. We'd be interested in getting comments on
> everything from the packaging, layout, through documentation, UI, and of
> course,
> any bugs found. I deployed to maven [3] and would particularly like
> to hear from downstream projects on whether our maven packaging is
> palatable.
>
> This is the last in the 0.95 series of development releases. You can think
> of this
> release as a 0.96.0-beta. No more features will come in on the 0.95
> branch. Only
> fixes and polish are allowed from here on out. I intend to branch 0.96
> from 0.95
> branch next week and put up a 0.96.0RC0 soon after.
>
> Thanks,
> St.Ack
>
> 1. http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hbase.versioning
> 2.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.95.2%22%20AND%20project%20%3D%20HBASE%20ORDER%20BY%20issuetype%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
> 3.
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/hbase/hbase/
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Thank You.