You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "Kurt Young (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/06/25 02:10:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-12966) finalize package name of Hive table source/sink

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16871925#comment-16871925 ] 

Kurt Young commented on FLINK-12966:
------------------------------------

+1 to `org.apache.flink.connectors.hive`

> finalize package name of Hive table source/sink
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-12966
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12966
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Connectors / Hive
>    Affects Versions: 1.9.0
>            Reporter: Bowen Li
>            Assignee: zjuwangg
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.9.0
>
>
> It's been brought by [~ykt836] and Jeff Zhang that the package name of `org.apache.flink.batch.connector` may not be proper.
> I think @zjuwangg named it this way because most connector packages are named as org.apache.flink.streaming.connectors.xxx and he is just following the convention. However, as we are forwarding to streaming-batch unification, we probably don't need "streaming/batch" in the package names any more, coz, like file source/sink, hive source/sink can (doesn't mean we necessarily will) be made as streaming in the future. I'm thinking of just org.apache.flink.connectors.hive. What do you think?
> cc [~ykt836] [~xuefuz] [~lirui]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)