You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to server-dev@james.apache.org by Peter Donald <do...@apache.org> on 2001/02/18 07:02:10 UTC
CVS changes
Hi,
you may have noticed that I just made some changes to CVS. I just made it
so GUMP will compile clean and I started hacking on updating James to use
Loggable interface rather than directly accessing LogKit.getLoggerFor().
The reason is that sometime in the future the LogKit method will become
protected by a security permission.
I think I haven't broken anything ... thou feel free to jumpon me if I have
;) Also I have tried to remove Avalonisms from James code I touched (ie m_*
) because I figure you prolly figure it as a foul coding standard aswell ;)
I still haven't seen any commit notifications come through ... did someone
notify apmail about cvs commits being redirected to a james list?
Cheers,
Pete
*-----------------------------------------------------*
| "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, |
| and proving that there is no need to do so - almost |
| everyone gets busy on the proof." |
| - John Kenneth Galbraith |
*-----------------------------------------------------*
Re: CVS changes
Posted by Peter Donald <do...@apache.org>.
At 11:25 18/2/01 +0000, Charles Benett wrote:
>However, the big question is (as I haven't got time to look at cvs right
>now), does the version of james in cvs work with a released version of
>avalon? When I looked at the gump output, the problem was
>incompatabilities between Avalon 3.1a1 and avalon in cvs.
hmm .. I think there is one incompatable change (passing config data as
hint to store). I will try to think of a good way around this.
Cheers,
Pete
*-----------------------------------------------------*
| "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, |
| and proving that there is no need to do so - almost |
| everyone gets busy on the proof." |
| - John Kenneth Galbraith |
*-----------------------------------------------------*
Re: CVS changes
Posted by Serge Knystautas <se...@lokitech.com>.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Charles Benett" <Ch...@benett1.demon.co.uk>
> Don't know, but I haven't seen any commits either.
>
> However, the big question is (as I haven't got time to look at cvs right
> now), does the version of james in cvs work with a released version of
> avalon? When I looked at the gump output, the problem was
> incompatabilities between Avalon 3.1a1 and avalon in cvs.
>
> I think james cvs should work against a released version of avalon,
> otherwise anyone wanting to help with james coding is going to have to
> master 2 (or possible 4 if avalon splits) cvs modules.
>
> So, I'm unconvinced of the necessity of gumpiness.
Speaking as someone who doesn't have a clue how Avalon works... I don't care
what version of Avalon we're using...historically either the API is
self-explanatory and working enough that I don't need to look at the Avalon
source, or it's not. As Avalon (like most open source projects) is not
overflowing with documentation, going to the code is usually the path of
least resistance. As long as I have a rough date when the avalon snapshot
was made, I can find what I need in CVS.
I'm happy to see gump's dumps as the fact that ant wasn't working with james
was somewhat annoying personally.
Serge Knystautas
Loki Technologies
http://www.lokitech.com/
Re: CVS changes
Posted by Charles Benett <Ch...@benett1.demon.co.uk>.
Peter Donald wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> you may have noticed that I just made some changes to CVS. I just made it
> so GUMP will compile clean and I started hacking on updating James to use
> Loggable interface rather than directly accessing LogKit.getLoggerFor().
> The reason is that sometime in the future the LogKit method will become
> protected by a security permission.
>
> I think I haven't broken anything ... thou feel free to jumpon me if I have
> ;) Also I have tried to remove Avalonisms from James code I touched (ie m_*
> ) because I figure you prolly figure it as a foul coding standard aswell ;)
>
> I still haven't seen any commit notifications come through ... did someone
> notify apmail about cvs commits being redirected to a james list?
Don't know, but I haven't seen any commits either.
However, the big question is (as I haven't got time to look at cvs right
now), does the version of james in cvs work with a released version of
avalon? When I looked at the gump output, the problem was
incompatabilities between Avalon 3.1a1 and avalon in cvs.
I think james cvs should work against a released version of avalon,
otherwise anyone wanting to help with james coding is going to have to
master 2 (or possible 4 if avalon splits) cvs modules.
So, I'm unconvinced of the necessity of gumpiness.
Charles
Re: CVS changes
Posted by Peter Donald <do...@apache.org>.
Also the fact that everything is now logging to one file is a bug in Avalon
that I am fixing now so I will update the James .jars w\once the bug is
zapped.
Cheers,
Pete
*-----------------------------------------------------*
| "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, |
| and proving that there is no need to do so - almost |
| everyone gets busy on the proof." |
| - John Kenneth Galbraith |
*-----------------------------------------------------*
Re: CVS changes
Posted by Jon Stevens <jo...@latchkey.com>.
on 2/17/01 10:02 PM, "Peter Donald" <do...@apache.org> wrote:
> I still haven't seen any commit notifications come through ... did someone
> notify apmail about cvs commits being redirected to a james list?
I just sent email to brian (again) to ask him to fix this. :-)
-jon
--
If you come from a Perl or PHP background, JSP is a way to take
your pain to new levels. --Anonymous
<http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/> && <http://java.apache.org/turbine/>