You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to soap-user@ws.apache.org by root <at...@ingenuity-sw.com> on 2000/09/18 05:59:49 UTC
Re:Battlestations, once again
I agree with you 100% about Windows .net. And I don't
think its just SOAP that's an issue, its really about
Java and J2EE.
If Java has any weaknesses at all
(and who among us can't find some) and if the
powers that be (IBM are you listening, you idiots!) can't
close ranks and get J2EE up to par with everything
that .net offers ( and I do mean every tweaking thing)
then it *will* mean Microsoft world domination.
I am not kidding.
*There will be nothing left.*
(And there is nothing the DOJ breakup will do to mar
this scenario---that's what's so brilliant about
MS XML strategy.)
Sincerely,
Ann Tecklenburg
at@ingenuity-sw.com
Re: Battlestations, once again
Posted by Jorge Martinez <jo...@mail.yourfit.com>.
It should spice up the list once again,
Jorge M.
Gouker wrote:
> Well, it was getting kinda dull...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John E. Conlon [mailto:jconlon@verticon.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2000 11:26 AM
> To: soap-user@xml.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Battlestations, once again
>
> The fog of war - the smell of gunpowder, the shell shocked marketing
> directors, the confused press reports...
>
> Ah it is just like the good old days again.
>
> John Conlon
> Verticon, Inc.
>
> At 08:36 AM 9/18/00 -0500, you wrote:
> >Please, with Soap and XML it is NOT IBM but sun. otherwise
> >you are right on! About J2EE you are correct. There is only
> >one J2EE standard and anything different (even slightly!) is
> >NOT J2EE. (-: MS just invested $50 mills in India to get
> >'cheap' labor for writing Windows.net Applications. Good for
> >India but not so good for any and all ERP vendors!
> >Regards - George
> >
> >root wrote:
> >
> >> I agree with you 100% about Windows .net. And I don't
> >> think its just SOAP that's an issue, its really about
> >> Java and J2EE.
> >>
> >> If Java has any weaknesses at all
> >> (and who among us can't find some) and if the
> >> powers that be (IBM are you listening, you idiots!) can't
> >> close ranks and get J2EE up to par with everything
> >> that .net offers ( and I do mean every tweaking thing)
> >> then it *will* mean Microsoft world domination.
> >>
> >> I am not kidding.
> >>
> >> *There will be nothing left.*
> >>
> >> (And there is nothing the DOJ breakup will do to mar
> >> this scenario---that's what's so brilliant about
> >> MS XML strategy.)
> >>
> >> Sincerely,
> >>
> >> Ann Tecklenburg
> >> at@ingenuity-sw.com
> >
> ************************************************************************
> John E. Conlon
> jconlon@verticon.com
> tel: (770) 886-5470
> fax: (770) 888-6894
> <http://www.verticon.com/>www.verticon.com
> ************************************************************************
Re: Battlestations, once again
Posted by Jorge Martinez <jo...@mail.yourfit.com>.
It should spice up the list once again,
Jorge M.
Gouker wrote:
> Well, it was getting kinda dull...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John E. Conlon [mailto:jconlon@verticon.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2000 11:26 AM
> To: soap-user@xml.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Battlestations, once again
>
> The fog of war - the smell of gunpowder, the shell shocked marketing
> directors, the confused press reports...
>
> Ah it is just like the good old days again.
>
> John Conlon
> Verticon, Inc.
>
> At 08:36 AM 9/18/00 -0500, you wrote:
> >Please, with Soap and XML it is NOT IBM but sun. otherwise
> >you are right on! About J2EE you are correct. There is only
> >one J2EE standard and anything different (even slightly!) is
> >NOT J2EE. (-: MS just invested $50 mills in India to get
> >'cheap' labor for writing Windows.net Applications. Good for
> >India but not so good for any and all ERP vendors!
> >Regards - George
> >
> >root wrote:
> >
> >> I agree with you 100% about Windows .net. And I don't
> >> think its just SOAP that's an issue, its really about
> >> Java and J2EE.
> >>
> >> If Java has any weaknesses at all
> >> (and who among us can't find some) and if the
> >> powers that be (IBM are you listening, you idiots!) can't
> >> close ranks and get J2EE up to par with everything
> >> that .net offers ( and I do mean every tweaking thing)
> >> then it *will* mean Microsoft world domination.
> >>
> >> I am not kidding.
> >>
> >> *There will be nothing left.*
> >>
> >> (And there is nothing the DOJ breakup will do to mar
> >> this scenario---that's what's so brilliant about
> >> MS XML strategy.)
> >>
> >> Sincerely,
> >>
> >> Ann Tecklenburg
> >> at@ingenuity-sw.com
> >
> ************************************************************************
> John E. Conlon
> jconlon@verticon.com
> tel: (770) 886-5470
> fax: (770) 888-6894
> <http://www.verticon.com/>www.verticon.com
> ************************************************************************
RE: Battlestations, once again
Posted by Gouker <go...@bellsouth.net>.
Well, it was getting kinda dull...
-----Original Message-----
From: John E. Conlon [mailto:jconlon@verticon.com]
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2000 11:26 AM
To: soap-user@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: Battlestations, once again
The fog of war - the smell of gunpowder, the shell shocked marketing
directors, the confused press reports...
Ah it is just like the good old days again.
John Conlon
Verticon, Inc.
At 08:36 AM 9/18/00 -0500, you wrote:
>Please, with Soap and XML it is NOT IBM but sun. otherwise
>you are right on! About J2EE you are correct. There is only
>one J2EE standard and anything different (even slightly!) is
>NOT J2EE. (-: MS just invested $50 mills in India to get
>'cheap' labor for writing Windows.net Applications. Good for
>India but not so good for any and all ERP vendors!
>Regards - George
>
>root wrote:
>
>> I agree with you 100% about Windows .net. And I don't
>> think its just SOAP that's an issue, its really about
>> Java and J2EE.
>>
>> If Java has any weaknesses at all
>> (and who among us can't find some) and if the
>> powers that be (IBM are you listening, you idiots!) can't
>> close ranks and get J2EE up to par with everything
>> that .net offers ( and I do mean every tweaking thing)
>> then it *will* mean Microsoft world domination.
>>
>> I am not kidding.
>>
>> *There will be nothing left.*
>>
>> (And there is nothing the DOJ breakup will do to mar
>> this scenario---that's what's so brilliant about
>> MS XML strategy.)
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Ann Tecklenburg
>> at@ingenuity-sw.com
>
************************************************************************
John E. Conlon
jconlon@verticon.com
tel: (770) 886-5470
fax: (770) 888-6894
<http://www.verticon.com/>www.verticon.com
************************************************************************
RE: Battlestations, once again
Posted by Gouker <go...@bellsouth.net>.
Well, it was getting kinda dull...
-----Original Message-----
From: John E. Conlon [mailto:jconlon@verticon.com]
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2000 11:26 AM
To: soap-user@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: Battlestations, once again
The fog of war - the smell of gunpowder, the shell shocked marketing
directors, the confused press reports...
Ah it is just like the good old days again.
John Conlon
Verticon, Inc.
At 08:36 AM 9/18/00 -0500, you wrote:
>Please, with Soap and XML it is NOT IBM but sun. otherwise
>you are right on! About J2EE you are correct. There is only
>one J2EE standard and anything different (even slightly!) is
>NOT J2EE. (-: MS just invested $50 mills in India to get
>'cheap' labor for writing Windows.net Applications. Good for
>India but not so good for any and all ERP vendors!
>Regards - George
>
>root wrote:
>
>> I agree with you 100% about Windows .net. And I don't
>> think its just SOAP that's an issue, its really about
>> Java and J2EE.
>>
>> If Java has any weaknesses at all
>> (and who among us can't find some) and if the
>> powers that be (IBM are you listening, you idiots!) can't
>> close ranks and get J2EE up to par with everything
>> that .net offers ( and I do mean every tweaking thing)
>> then it *will* mean Microsoft world domination.
>>
>> I am not kidding.
>>
>> *There will be nothing left.*
>>
>> (And there is nothing the DOJ breakup will do to mar
>> this scenario---that's what's so brilliant about
>> MS XML strategy.)
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Ann Tecklenburg
>> at@ingenuity-sw.com
>
************************************************************************
John E. Conlon
jconlon@verticon.com
tel: (770) 886-5470
fax: (770) 888-6894
<http://www.verticon.com/>www.verticon.com
************************************************************************
Re: Battlestations, once again
Posted by "John E. Conlon" <jc...@verticon.com>.
The fog of war - the smell of gunpowder, the shell shocked marketing
directors, the confused press reports...
Ah it is just like the good old days again.
John Conlon
Verticon, Inc.
At 08:36 AM 9/18/00 -0500, you wrote:
>Please, with Soap and XML it is NOT IBM but sun. otherwise
>you are right on! About J2EE you are correct. There is only
>one J2EE standard and anything different (even slightly!) is
>NOT J2EE. (-: MS just invested $50 mills in India to get
>'cheap' labor for writing Windows.net Applications. Good for
>India but not so good for any and all ERP vendors!
>Regards - George
>
>root wrote:
>
>> I agree with you 100% about Windows .net. And I don't
>> think its just SOAP that's an issue, its really about
>> Java and J2EE.
>>
>> If Java has any weaknesses at all
>> (and who among us can't find some) and if the
>> powers that be (IBM are you listening, you idiots!) can't
>> close ranks and get J2EE up to par with everything
>> that .net offers ( and I do mean every tweaking thing)
>> then it *will* mean Microsoft world domination.
>>
>> I am not kidding.
>>
>> *There will be nothing left.*
>>
>> (And there is nothing the DOJ breakup will do to mar
>> this scenario---that's what's so brilliant about
>> MS XML strategy.)
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Ann Tecklenburg
>> at@ingenuity-sw.com
>
************************************************************************
John E. Conlon
jconlon@verticon.com
tel: (770) 886-5470
fax: (770) 888-6894
<http://www.verticon.com/>www.verticon.com
************************************************************************
Re: Battlestations, once again
Posted by "John E. Conlon" <jc...@verticon.com>.
The fog of war - the smell of gunpowder, the shell shocked marketing
directors, the confused press reports...
Ah it is just like the good old days again.
John Conlon
Verticon, Inc.
At 08:36 AM 9/18/00 -0500, you wrote:
>Please, with Soap and XML it is NOT IBM but sun. otherwise
>you are right on! About J2EE you are correct. There is only
>one J2EE standard and anything different (even slightly!) is
>NOT J2EE. (-: MS just invested $50 mills in India to get
>'cheap' labor for writing Windows.net Applications. Good for
>India but not so good for any and all ERP vendors!
>Regards - George
>
>root wrote:
>
>> I agree with you 100% about Windows .net. And I don't
>> think its just SOAP that's an issue, its really about
>> Java and J2EE.
>>
>> If Java has any weaknesses at all
>> (and who among us can't find some) and if the
>> powers that be (IBM are you listening, you idiots!) can't
>> close ranks and get J2EE up to par with everything
>> that .net offers ( and I do mean every tweaking thing)
>> then it *will* mean Microsoft world domination.
>>
>> I am not kidding.
>>
>> *There will be nothing left.*
>>
>> (And there is nothing the DOJ breakup will do to mar
>> this scenario---that's what's so brilliant about
>> MS XML strategy.)
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Ann Tecklenburg
>> at@ingenuity-sw.com
>
************************************************************************
John E. Conlon
jconlon@verticon.com
tel: (770) 886-5470
fax: (770) 888-6894
<http://www.verticon.com/>www.verticon.com
************************************************************************
Re: Battlestations, once again
Posted by George I Matkovits <ma...@uswest.net>.
Please, with Soap and XML it is NOT IBM but sun. otherwise
you are right on! About J2EE you are correct. There is only
one J2EE standard and anything different (even slightly!) is
NOT J2EE. (-: MS just invested $50 mills in India to get
'cheap' labor for writing Windows.net Applications. Good for
India but not so good for any and all ERP vendors!
Regards - George
root wrote:
> I agree with you 100% about Windows .net. And I don't
> think its just SOAP that's an issue, its really about
> Java and J2EE.
>
> If Java has any weaknesses at all
> (and who among us can't find some) and if the
> powers that be (IBM are you listening, you idiots!) can't
> close ranks and get J2EE up to par with everything
> that .net offers ( and I do mean every tweaking thing)
> then it *will* mean Microsoft world domination.
>
> I am not kidding.
>
> *There will be nothing left.*
>
> (And there is nothing the DOJ breakup will do to mar
> this scenario---that's what's so brilliant about
> MS XML strategy.)
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Ann Tecklenburg
> at@ingenuity-sw.com
Re: Battlestations, once again
Posted by George I Matkovits <ma...@uswest.net>.
Please, with Soap and XML it is NOT IBM but sun. otherwise
you are right on! About J2EE you are correct. There is only
one J2EE standard and anything different (even slightly!) is
NOT J2EE. (-: MS just invested $50 mills in India to get
'cheap' labor for writing Windows.net Applications. Good for
India but not so good for any and all ERP vendors!
Regards - George
root wrote:
> I agree with you 100% about Windows .net. And I don't
> think its just SOAP that's an issue, its really about
> Java and J2EE.
>
> If Java has any weaknesses at all
> (and who among us can't find some) and if the
> powers that be (IBM are you listening, you idiots!) can't
> close ranks and get J2EE up to par with everything
> that .net offers ( and I do mean every tweaking thing)
> then it *will* mean Microsoft world domination.
>
> I am not kidding.
>
> *There will be nothing left.*
>
> (And there is nothing the DOJ breakup will do to mar
> this scenario---that's what's so brilliant about
> MS XML strategy.)
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Ann Tecklenburg
> at@ingenuity-sw.com