You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cocoon.apache.org by Grzegorz Kossakowski <gk...@apache.org> on 2007/06/26 11:15:42 UTC
[REMINDER] Re: [vote] Releasing from trunk: Cocoon 2.2-RC1 & others
(take 2)
Reinhard Poetz pisze:
>
> I prepared another series of releases from trunk, see the list of all 43
> artifacts below. The problems with references to snapshots and the usage
> of the repository element in some of the poms are sorted out.
>
<snip/>
>
> This majority vote stays open for 120 hours.
>
Call me a greenhorn but I'm really concerned that we have only two votes, yet.
I hope to see crowd that decided to surprise me and is going to vote just before deadline... :-)
--
Grzegorz Kossakowski
http://reflectingonthevicissitudes.wordpress.com/
Re: [REMINDER] Re: [vote] Releasing from trunk: Cocoon 2.2-RC1 &
others (take 2)
Posted by Jeroen Reijn <jr...@hippo.nl>.
Hi all,
I'm afraid it's the same here. I've been going through some samples.
They seem to be fine, but I've been too occupied lately to give a good
vote. So +0 on my behalve.
Regards,
Jeroen Reijn
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
> On 26.06.2007 19:32, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
>> The best I could do would be +0. I haven't had time to work with it.
>
> Unfortunately the same here.
>
> Joerg
Re: [REMINDER] Re: [vote] Releasing from trunk: Cocoon 2.2-RC1 &
others (take 2)
Posted by Joerg Heinicke <jo...@gmx.de>.
On 26.06.2007 19:32, Ralph Goers wrote:
> The best I could do would be +0. I haven't had time to work with it.
Unfortunately the same here.
Joerg
Re: [REMINDER] Re: [vote] Releasing from trunk: Cocoon 2.2-RC1 &
others (take 2)
Posted by Ralph Goers <Ra...@dslextreme.com>.
The best I could do would be +0. I haven't had time to work with it.
Ralph
Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:
> Reinhard Poetz pisze:
>>
>> I prepared another series of releases from trunk, see the list of all 43
>> artifacts below. The problems with references to snapshots and the
>> usage of the repository element in some of the poms are sorted out.
>>
>
> <snip/>
>
>>
>> This majority vote stays open for 120 hours.
>>
>
> Call me a greenhorn but I'm really concerned that we have only two
> votes, yet.
> I hope to see crowd that decided to surprise me and is going to vote
> just before deadline... :-)
>