You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@subversion.apache.org by st...@apache.org on 2012/08/03 13:57:06 UTC
svn commit: r1368904 - /subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
Author: stefan2
Date: Fri Aug 3 11:57:05 2012
New Revision: 1368904
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1368904&view=rev
Log:
* STATUS: Propose r1368065, r1368128 and vote for them.
Modified:
subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
Modified: subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS?rev=1368904&r1=1368903&r2=1368904&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS Fri Aug 3 11:57:05 2012
@@ -71,6 +71,31 @@ Candidate changes:
Votes:
+1: brane
+ * r1368065
+ Incomplete copy information leading to segfault.
+ Justification:
+ Although this doesn't address nor identify the root cause of
+ the problem, it is still better to return an svn_error_t*
+ instead of simply segfaulting.
+ This issue is also the most common cause of SVN lib related
+ crashes reported in TSVN.
+ Votes:
+ +1: stefan2
+
+ * r1368128
+ Segfault in handling deleted wc items.
+ Justification:
+ Unknown circumstances can lead to the situation that neither
+ the relpath for BASE nor the one for WORK are available.
+ The patch makes the implicit assumption of the latter being
+ non-NULL if the first isn't explicit. Even if the root cause
+ was random wc corruption, this patch will at least make our
+ code more robust.
+ This issue is also the 3rd-most common cause of SVN lib related
+ crashes reported in TSVN.
+ Votes:
+ +1: stefan2
+
Veto-blocked changes:
=====================