You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@subversion.apache.org by st...@apache.org on 2012/08/03 13:57:06 UTC

svn commit: r1368904 - /subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS

Author: stefan2
Date: Fri Aug  3 11:57:05 2012
New Revision: 1368904

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1368904&view=rev
Log:
* STATUS: Propose r1368065, r1368128 and vote for them.

Modified:
    subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS

Modified: subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS?rev=1368904&r1=1368903&r2=1368904&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS Fri Aug  3 11:57:05 2012
@@ -71,6 +71,31 @@ Candidate changes:
    Votes:
      +1: brane
 
+ * r1368065
+   Incomplete copy information leading to segfault.
+   Justification:
+      Although this doesn't address nor identify the root cause of
+      the problem, it is still better to return an svn_error_t*
+      instead of simply segfaulting.
+      This issue is also the most common cause of SVN lib related
+      crashes reported in TSVN.
+   Votes:
+     +1: stefan2
+
+ * r1368128
+   Segfault in handling deleted wc items.
+   Justification:
+      Unknown circumstances can lead to the situation that neither
+      the relpath for BASE nor the one for WORK are available.
+      The patch makes the implicit assumption of the latter being
+      non-NULL if the first isn't explicit. Even if the root cause
+      was random wc corruption, this patch will at least make our
+      code more robust.
+      This issue is also the 3rd-most common cause of SVN lib related
+      crashes reported in TSVN.
+   Votes:
+     +1: stefan2
+
 Veto-blocked changes:
 =====================