You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hama.apache.org by Thomas Jungblut <th...@googlemail.com> on 2011/08/16 16:05:29 UTC
[Discussion] Task Priority/Goals
Hey guys,
I guess we have to speak about what we want to do next and in which order.
And maybe what our goals are for the next monts.
We have 3 larger tasks in the Pipe and their assignee:
- HAMA-410 Multiple Tasks per Groom (Edward)
- HAMA-409 Pregel API (Miklos, Edward, me)
- Fault Tolerance and various subtasks, e.G. HAMA-199
What are our plans for the next months and 0.4.0 release?
I saw Edward already tweet about several project goals like "new 5+
committers, 3+ PPMC members".
Where do you see us in 3-4 months?
Best regards,
Thomas
Re: [Discussion] Task Priority/Goals
Posted by "Edward J. Yoon" <ed...@apache.org>.
> Okay so you going to focus on HAMA-410 Edward?
P.S., Yes~
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:41 PM, Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org> wrote:
>> We should keep the release-timing up and make our next release before 2012
>> (IMO).
>
> I think so.
>
>> And in general we should focus a bit more on algebraic computation, this
>> isn't possible with giraph and can be very helpful.
>
> Our goal is clear. IMO, we should focus on easy-to-use system in the short-term.
>
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Thomas Jungblut
> <th...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Okay so you going to focus on HAMA-410 Edward?
>> After that Whirr stuff I'll take care of HAMA-409, it would be great if
>> Miklos is going to help me a bit if he has time :)
>> We should keep the release-timing up and make our next release before 2012
>> (IMO).
>>
>> And in general we should focus a bit more on algebraic computation, this
>> isn't possible with giraph and can be very helpful.
>>
>> 2011/8/17 Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
>>
>>> HAMA-410 must be fixed and tested before release 0.4.0. It's heavily
>>> related with other many next issues I think e.g., InputOutput system,
>>> Fault tolerant, ..., .etc.
>>>
>>> If that architecture is not good, we should re-implement it.
>>>
>>> Miklos, How's HAMA-409 going?
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Thomas Jungblut
>>> <th...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> > Hey guys,
>>> >
>>> > I guess we have to speak about what we want to do next and in which
>>> order.
>>> > And maybe what our goals are for the next monts.
>>> >
>>> > We have 3 larger tasks in the Pipe and their assignee:
>>> > - HAMA-410 Multiple Tasks per Groom (Edward)
>>> > - HAMA-409 Pregel API (Miklos, Edward, me)
>>> > - Fault Tolerance and various subtasks, e.G. HAMA-199
>>> >
>>> > What are our plans for the next months and 0.4.0 release?
>>> >
>>> > I saw Edward already tweet about several project goals like "new 5+
>>> > committers, 3+ PPMC members".
>>> >
>>> > Where do you see us in 3-4 months?
>>> >
>>> > Best regards,
>>> > Thomas
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>>> @eddieyoon
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thomas Jungblut
>> Berlin
>>
>> mobile: 0170-3081070
>>
>> business: thomas.jungblut@testberichte.de
>> private: thomas.jungblut@gmail.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> @eddieyoon
>
--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon
Re: [Discussion] Task Priority/Goals
Posted by "Edward J. Yoon" <ed...@apache.org>.
> We should keep the release-timing up and make our next release before 2012
> (IMO).
I think so.
> And in general we should focus a bit more on algebraic computation, this
> isn't possible with giraph and can be very helpful.
Our goal is clear. IMO, we should focus on easy-to-use system in the short-term.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Thomas Jungblut
<th...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Okay so you going to focus on HAMA-410 Edward?
> After that Whirr stuff I'll take care of HAMA-409, it would be great if
> Miklos is going to help me a bit if he has time :)
> We should keep the release-timing up and make our next release before 2012
> (IMO).
>
> And in general we should focus a bit more on algebraic computation, this
> isn't possible with giraph and can be very helpful.
>
> 2011/8/17 Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
>
>> HAMA-410 must be fixed and tested before release 0.4.0. It's heavily
>> related with other many next issues I think e.g., InputOutput system,
>> Fault tolerant, ..., .etc.
>>
>> If that architecture is not good, we should re-implement it.
>>
>> Miklos, How's HAMA-409 going?
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Thomas Jungblut
>> <th...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> > Hey guys,
>> >
>> > I guess we have to speak about what we want to do next and in which
>> order.
>> > And maybe what our goals are for the next monts.
>> >
>> > We have 3 larger tasks in the Pipe and their assignee:
>> > - HAMA-410 Multiple Tasks per Groom (Edward)
>> > - HAMA-409 Pregel API (Miklos, Edward, me)
>> > - Fault Tolerance and various subtasks, e.G. HAMA-199
>> >
>> > What are our plans for the next months and 0.4.0 release?
>> >
>> > I saw Edward already tweet about several project goals like "new 5+
>> > committers, 3+ PPMC members".
>> >
>> > Where do you see us in 3-4 months?
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> > Thomas
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>> @eddieyoon
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas Jungblut
> Berlin
>
> mobile: 0170-3081070
>
> business: thomas.jungblut@testberichte.de
> private: thomas.jungblut@gmail.com
>
--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon
Re: [Discussion] Task Priority/Goals
Posted by Thomas Jungblut <th...@googlemail.com>.
Okay so you going to focus on HAMA-410 Edward?
After that Whirr stuff I'll take care of HAMA-409, it would be great if
Miklos is going to help me a bit if he has time :)
We should keep the release-timing up and make our next release before 2012
(IMO).
And in general we should focus a bit more on algebraic computation, this
isn't possible with giraph and can be very helpful.
2011/8/17 Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
> HAMA-410 must be fixed and tested before release 0.4.0. It's heavily
> related with other many next issues I think e.g., InputOutput system,
> Fault tolerant, ..., .etc.
>
> If that architecture is not good, we should re-implement it.
>
> Miklos, How's HAMA-409 going?
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Thomas Jungblut
> <th...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > I guess we have to speak about what we want to do next and in which
> order.
> > And maybe what our goals are for the next monts.
> >
> > We have 3 larger tasks in the Pipe and their assignee:
> > - HAMA-410 Multiple Tasks per Groom (Edward)
> > - HAMA-409 Pregel API (Miklos, Edward, me)
> > - Fault Tolerance and various subtasks, e.G. HAMA-199
> >
> > What are our plans for the next months and 0.4.0 release?
> >
> > I saw Edward already tweet about several project goals like "new 5+
> > committers, 3+ PPMC members".
> >
> > Where do you see us in 3-4 months?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Thomas
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> @eddieyoon
>
--
Thomas Jungblut
Berlin
mobile: 0170-3081070
business: thomas.jungblut@testberichte.de
private: thomas.jungblut@gmail.com
Re: [Discussion] Task Priority/Goals
Posted by ChiaHung Lin <ch...@nuk.edu.tw>.
The issue HAMA-398 (original HAMA-241) hopefully can be done in the next week.
-----Original message-----
From:Thomas Jungblut <th...@googlemail.com>
To:hama-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date:Wed, 17 Aug 2011 19:32:41 +0200
Subject:Re: [Discussion] Task Priority/Goals
>
> Dirty but almost done. Now I am trying to test and figure out
> potential problems.
>
That is fine.
I think you should make a list of what you've figured out, commit the patch
and create subtasks for the problems.
So we can merge the stuff from HAMA-409 into the new task structure.
For HAMA-409 a simple graph input system has been designed (similar to
> Goldenorb) to replace the current code depending on GPL code.
There'll be a simple text-based built-in implementation for
> reading graphs.
I'm not to sure if we should include GPL code in our project, since we have
some similar input parsers for the examples (Text/Sequence File). We just
have to refactor them and extract an open/configurable API.
After mavenization is done, it should be easy to add hama-graph as a
> separate package.
>
Definitely +1.
And the others? Do you have an opinion on these topics?
2011/8/17 Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
> > What's the current state of HAMA-410?
>
> Dirty but almost done. Now I am trying to test and figure out
> potential problems.
>
> 2011/8/17 Mikl鏀 Erd幨yi <er...@gmail.com>:
> > For HAMA-409 a simple graph input system has been designed (similar to
> > Goldenorb) to replace the current code depending on GPL code
> > fragments. There'll be a simple text-based built-in implementation for
> > reading graphs.
> > After mavenization is done, it should be easy to add hama-graph as a
> > separate package.
> >
> > What's the current state of HAMA-410?
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> HAMA-410 must be fixed and tested before release 0.4.0. It's heavily
> >> related with other many next issues I think e.g., InputOutput system,
> >> Fault tolerant, ..., .etc.
> >>
> >> If that architecture is not good, we should re-implement it.
> >>
> >> Miklos, How's HAMA-409 going?
> >>
> >> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Thomas Jungblut
> >> <th...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>> Hey guys,
> >>>
> >>> I guess we have to speak about what we want to do next and in which
> order.
> >>> And maybe what our goals are for the next monts.
> >>>
> >>> We have 3 larger tasks in the Pipe and their assignee:
> >>> - HAMA-410 Multiple Tasks per Groom (Edward)
> >>> - HAMA-409 Pregel API (Miklos, Edward, me)
> >>> - Fault Tolerance and various subtasks, e.G. HAMA-199
> >>>
> >>> What are our plans for the next months and 0.4.0 release?
> >>>
> >>> I saw Edward already tweet about several project goals like "new 5+
> >>> committers, 3+ PPMC members".
> >>>
> >>> Where do you see us in 3-4 months?
> >>>
> >>> Best regards,
> >>> Thomas
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> >> @eddieyoon
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> @eddieyoon
>
--
Thomas Jungblut
Berlin
mobile: 0170-3081070
business: thomas.jungblut@testberichte.de
private: thomas.jungblut@gmail.com
--
ChiaHung Lin
Department of Information Management
National University of Kaohsiung
Taiwan
Re: [Discussion] Task Priority/Goals
Posted by Thomas Jungblut <th...@googlemail.com>.
>
> Dirty but almost done. Now I am trying to test and figure out
> potential problems.
>
That is fine.
I think you should make a list of what you've figured out, commit the patch
and create subtasks for the problems.
So we can merge the stuff from HAMA-409 into the new task structure.
For HAMA-409 a simple graph input system has been designed (similar to
> Goldenorb) to replace the current code depending on GPL code.
There'll be a simple text-based built-in implementation for
> reading graphs.
I'm not to sure if we should include GPL code in our project, since we have
some similar input parsers for the examples (Text/Sequence File). We just
have to refactor them and extract an open/configurable API.
After mavenization is done, it should be easy to add hama-graph as a
> separate package.
>
Definitely +1.
And the others? Do you have an opinion on these topics?
2011/8/17 Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
> > What's the current state of HAMA-410?
>
> Dirty but almost done. Now I am trying to test and figure out
> potential problems.
>
> 2011/8/17 Miklós Erdélyi <er...@gmail.com>:
> > For HAMA-409 a simple graph input system has been designed (similar to
> > Goldenorb) to replace the current code depending on GPL code
> > fragments. There'll be a simple text-based built-in implementation for
> > reading graphs.
> > After mavenization is done, it should be easy to add hama-graph as a
> > separate package.
> >
> > What's the current state of HAMA-410?
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> HAMA-410 must be fixed and tested before release 0.4.0. It's heavily
> >> related with other many next issues I think e.g., InputOutput system,
> >> Fault tolerant, ..., .etc.
> >>
> >> If that architecture is not good, we should re-implement it.
> >>
> >> Miklos, How's HAMA-409 going?
> >>
> >> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Thomas Jungblut
> >> <th...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>> Hey guys,
> >>>
> >>> I guess we have to speak about what we want to do next and in which
> order.
> >>> And maybe what our goals are for the next monts.
> >>>
> >>> We have 3 larger tasks in the Pipe and their assignee:
> >>> - HAMA-410 Multiple Tasks per Groom (Edward)
> >>> - HAMA-409 Pregel API (Miklos, Edward, me)
> >>> - Fault Tolerance and various subtasks, e.G. HAMA-199
> >>>
> >>> What are our plans for the next months and 0.4.0 release?
> >>>
> >>> I saw Edward already tweet about several project goals like "new 5+
> >>> committers, 3+ PPMC members".
> >>>
> >>> Where do you see us in 3-4 months?
> >>>
> >>> Best regards,
> >>> Thomas
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> >> @eddieyoon
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> @eddieyoon
>
--
Thomas Jungblut
Berlin
mobile: 0170-3081070
business: thomas.jungblut@testberichte.de
private: thomas.jungblut@gmail.com
Re: [Discussion] Task Priority/Goals
Posted by "Edward J. Yoon" <ed...@apache.org>.
> What's the current state of HAMA-410?
Dirty but almost done. Now I am trying to test and figure out
potential problems.
2011/8/17 Miklós Erdélyi <er...@gmail.com>:
> For HAMA-409 a simple graph input system has been designed (similar to
> Goldenorb) to replace the current code depending on GPL code
> fragments. There'll be a simple text-based built-in implementation for
> reading graphs.
> After mavenization is done, it should be easy to add hama-graph as a
> separate package.
>
> What's the current state of HAMA-410?
>
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org> wrote:
>> HAMA-410 must be fixed and tested before release 0.4.0. It's heavily
>> related with other many next issues I think e.g., InputOutput system,
>> Fault tolerant, ..., .etc.
>>
>> If that architecture is not good, we should re-implement it.
>>
>> Miklos, How's HAMA-409 going?
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Thomas Jungblut
>> <th...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> Hey guys,
>>>
>>> I guess we have to speak about what we want to do next and in which order.
>>> And maybe what our goals are for the next monts.
>>>
>>> We have 3 larger tasks in the Pipe and their assignee:
>>> - HAMA-410 Multiple Tasks per Groom (Edward)
>>> - HAMA-409 Pregel API (Miklos, Edward, me)
>>> - Fault Tolerance and various subtasks, e.G. HAMA-199
>>>
>>> What are our plans for the next months and 0.4.0 release?
>>>
>>> I saw Edward already tweet about several project goals like "new 5+
>>> committers, 3+ PPMC members".
>>>
>>> Where do you see us in 3-4 months?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>> @eddieyoon
>>
>
--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon
Re: [Discussion] Task Priority/Goals
Posted by Miklós Erdélyi <er...@gmail.com>.
For HAMA-409 a simple graph input system has been designed (similar to
Goldenorb) to replace the current code depending on GPL code
fragments. There'll be a simple text-based built-in implementation for
reading graphs.
After mavenization is done, it should be easy to add hama-graph as a
separate package.
What's the current state of HAMA-410?
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org> wrote:
> HAMA-410 must be fixed and tested before release 0.4.0. It's heavily
> related with other many next issues I think e.g., InputOutput system,
> Fault tolerant, ..., .etc.
>
> If that architecture is not good, we should re-implement it.
>
> Miklos, How's HAMA-409 going?
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Thomas Jungblut
> <th...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> I guess we have to speak about what we want to do next and in which order.
>> And maybe what our goals are for the next monts.
>>
>> We have 3 larger tasks in the Pipe and their assignee:
>> - HAMA-410 Multiple Tasks per Groom (Edward)
>> - HAMA-409 Pregel API (Miklos, Edward, me)
>> - Fault Tolerance and various subtasks, e.G. HAMA-199
>>
>> What are our plans for the next months and 0.4.0 release?
>>
>> I saw Edward already tweet about several project goals like "new 5+
>> committers, 3+ PPMC members".
>>
>> Where do you see us in 3-4 months?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Thomas
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> @eddieyoon
>
Re: [Discussion] Task Priority/Goals
Posted by "Edward J. Yoon" <ed...@apache.org>.
HAMA-410 must be fixed and tested before release 0.4.0. It's heavily
related with other many next issues I think e.g., InputOutput system,
Fault tolerant, ..., .etc.
If that architecture is not good, we should re-implement it.
Miklos, How's HAMA-409 going?
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Thomas Jungblut
<th...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I guess we have to speak about what we want to do next and in which order.
> And maybe what our goals are for the next monts.
>
> We have 3 larger tasks in the Pipe and their assignee:
> - HAMA-410 Multiple Tasks per Groom (Edward)
> - HAMA-409 Pregel API (Miklos, Edward, me)
> - Fault Tolerance and various subtasks, e.G. HAMA-199
>
> What are our plans for the next months and 0.4.0 release?
>
> I saw Edward already tweet about several project goals like "new 5+
> committers, 3+ PPMC members".
>
> Where do you see us in 3-4 months?
>
> Best regards,
> Thomas
>
--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon