You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to log4j-cvs@jakarta.apache.org by pa...@apache.org on 2001/05/20 12:39:35 UTC

cvs commit: jakarta-log4j/src/xdocs index.xml

pathos      01/05/20 03:39:35

  Modified:    src/xdocs index.xml
  Log:
  Fixed typos and changed title to 'Introduction' (it used to be log4j project, but with the project.xml file also containing Log4j project, you got Log4j project - log4j project)
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.3       +5 -5      jakarta-log4j/src/xdocs/index.xml
  
  Index: index.xml
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-log4j/src/xdocs/index.xml,v
  retrieving revision 1.2
  retrieving revision 1.3
  diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
  --- index.xml	2001/01/18 07:49:40	1.2
  +++ index.xml	2001/05/20 10:39:31	1.3
  @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
   
     <properties>
       <author email="cgu@apache.org">Ceki Gulcu</author>
  -    <title>log4j project</title>
  +    <title>Introduction</title>
     </properties>
   
   <body>
  @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
   
   <p>On the other hand, some people argue that log statements pollute
   source code and decrease legibility. (We believe that the contrary is
  -true).  In the Java language where a pre-processor is not available,
  +true).  In the Java language where a preprocessor is not available,
   log statements increase the size of the code and reduce its speed,
   even when logging is turned off.  Given that a reasonably sized
   application may contain thousands of log statements, speed is of
  @@ -47,9 +47,9 @@
   log4j server, a remote Unix Syslog daemon or even a NT Event logger.</p>
   
   <p>On a 233 MHz ThinkPad running JDK 1.1.7B, it costs about 46
  -nano-seconds to determine if that statement should be logged or
  -not. Actual logging is also quite fast, ranging from 79 micro-seconds
  -using the SimpleLayout, 164 micro-seconds using the TTCCLayout and
  +nanoseconds to determine if that statement should be logged or
  +not. Actual logging is also quite fast, ranging from 79 microseconds
  +using the SimpleLayout, 164 microseconds using the TTCCLayout and
   around a millisecond when printing exceptions. The performance of the
   PatternLayout is almost as good as the dedicated layouts, except that
   it is a lot more flexible.</p>
  
  
  

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-cvs-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-cvs-help@jakarta.apache.org