You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org> on 2003/11/14 21:23:43 UTC

Re: 1.2.x [was Multi Action servlet !]

Don Brown wrote:
> If that's the case, I really want to start kicking 1.x releases out the
> door.  What can I do to help?

The big stumbling block was that some of the tests weren't running. If 
they've been fixed, then anyone could cut a release when they felt the 
code base was ready. Like, say, now. :)

The release guidelines are here:

http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/releases.html

and there's an old draft of a release plan here:

http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/proposals/release-plan_1_2_0.html

If someone else wants to jump and be the release manager, be my guest :)

I still haven't actually gotten through the legacy LATER or REMIND 
tickets that we batch marked as part of the "get 1.1 out the door" 
initiative. But I have been through the truly old and decrepit ones, and 
enough may have been done on that score for now.

I don't actually believe that the site documentation is ready for 1.2.x 
GA release yet. But, it doesn't have to be. We can cut a 1.2.0 to shake 
out what needs to be documented, make some updates, and then roll 1.2.1. 
The overall Jakarta mode seems to be 4-6 releases to a single GA 
release, so I wouldn't expect a GA until about 1.2.5 anyway.

Of course, we will have to resolve the pending veto discussions before 
cutting a Struts release of any kind, but I imagine that can happen over 
the weekend, or even as part of a revised Release Plan.

-Ted.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: struts-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Re: 1.2.x [was Multi Action servlet !]

Posted by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>.
We can just label them as such on the release page.

http://jakarta.apache.org/site/binindex.cgi

This is a free-form page, and we can label the links anyway we like

* Struts 1.1.0 - Best available version
* Struts 1.2.0 - Also available ("Beta" quality release)

later ...

* Struts 1.2.6 - Best available version
* Struts 1.1.0 - Also available (prior stable release)
* Struts 1.2.7 - Also available (latest beta release)

We're actually using the Apache HTTPD release model, which Tomcat has 
already adopted.

http://httpd.apache.org/dev/release.html

http://httpd.apache.org/download.cgi

-Ted.

Don Brown wrote:
> Ok, so we are moving to a Tomcat-style release numbering.  How exactly do
> we make it clear that 1.2.0 will be "beta quality" while another in
> the 1.2.x line will be GA quality.  One advantage of alpha, beta, and rc
> qualifiers is it is immediately obvious to users which one is which.  I
> think tomcat is simplier, but it is also potentially more confusing.
> 
> Don
> 
> On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Ted Husted wrote:
> 
> 
>>Don Brown wrote:
>>
>>>If that's the case, I really want to start kicking 1.x releases out the
>>>door.  What can I do to help?
>>
>>The big stumbling block was that some of the tests weren't running. If
>>they've been fixed, then anyone could cut a release when they felt the
>>code base was ready. Like, say, now. :)
>>
>>The release guidelines are here:
>>
>>http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/releases.html
>>
>>and there's an old draft of a release plan here:
>>
>>http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/proposals/release-plan_1_2_0.html
>>
>>If someone else wants to jump and be the release manager, be my guest :)
>>
>>I still haven't actually gotten through the legacy LATER or REMIND
>>tickets that we batch marked as part of the "get 1.1 out the door"
>>initiative. But I have been through the truly old and decrepit ones, and
>>enough may have been done on that score for now.
>>
>>I don't actually believe that the site documentation is ready for 1.2.x
>>GA release yet. But, it doesn't have to be. We can cut a 1.2.0 to shake
>>out what needs to be documented, make some updates, and then roll 1.2.1.
>>The overall Jakarta mode seems to be 4-6 releases to a single GA
>>release, so I wouldn't expect a GA until about 1.2.5 anyway.
>>
>>Of course, we will have to resolve the pending veto discussions before
>>cutting a Struts release of any kind, but I imagine that can happen over
>>the weekend, or even as part of a revised Release Plan.
>>
>>-Ted.
>>
>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>>For additional commands, e-mail: struts-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: struts-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 
> 

-- 
Ted Husted,
   Junit in Action  - <http://www.manning.com/massol/>,
   Struts in Action - <http://husted.com/struts/book.html>,
   JSP Site Design  - <http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=1861005512>.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: struts-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Re: 1.2.x [was Multi Action servlet !]

Posted by Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org>.
Ok, so we are moving to a Tomcat-style release numbering.  How exactly do
we make it clear that 1.2.0 will be "beta quality" while another in
the 1.2.x line will be GA quality.  One advantage of alpha, beta, and rc
qualifiers is it is immediately obvious to users which one is which.  I
think tomcat is simplier, but it is also potentially more confusing.

Don

On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Ted Husted wrote:

> Don Brown wrote:
> > If that's the case, I really want to start kicking 1.x releases out the
> > door.  What can I do to help?
>
> The big stumbling block was that some of the tests weren't running. If
> they've been fixed, then anyone could cut a release when they felt the
> code base was ready. Like, say, now. :)
>
> The release guidelines are here:
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/releases.html
>
> and there's an old draft of a release plan here:
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/proposals/release-plan_1_2_0.html
>
> If someone else wants to jump and be the release manager, be my guest :)
>
> I still haven't actually gotten through the legacy LATER or REMIND
> tickets that we batch marked as part of the "get 1.1 out the door"
> initiative. But I have been through the truly old and decrepit ones, and
> enough may have been done on that score for now.
>
> I don't actually believe that the site documentation is ready for 1.2.x
> GA release yet. But, it doesn't have to be. We can cut a 1.2.0 to shake
> out what needs to be documented, make some updates, and then roll 1.2.1.
> The overall Jakarta mode seems to be 4-6 releases to a single GA
> release, so I wouldn't expect a GA until about 1.2.5 anyway.
>
> Of course, we will have to resolve the pending veto discussions before
> cutting a Struts release of any kind, but I imagine that can happen over
> the weekend, or even as part of a revised Release Plan.
>
> -Ted.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: struts-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: struts-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org