You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> on 2015/06/12 16:32:45 UTC
[FalconJX][FlexJS] JS.SWC in Nightly Build (was [DISCUSS] Release
Apache Flex Installer 3.2)
On 6/12/15, 7:02 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>Doing the RC is still behind trying to get Mike’s JS.swc in the FlexJS
>> Nightly and refactoring the Installer source for the Git-Split.
>
>
>
>Alex, what does this mean?
>
>Mike
>
That folks can install FlexJS Nightly, run js/bin/jsc MyASFile.as and get
js files out.
-Alex
Re: [FalconJX][FlexJS] JS.SWC in Nightly Build (was [DISCUSS] Release
Apache Flex Installer 3.2)
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 6/12/15, 8:55 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Ok, I am confused again. I thought with FlexJS you were required to have a
>Main.mxml file, not .as, am I wrong?
FlexJS can support AS-only projects as well. See
examples/DataBindingTest_as (of course I haven’t tried that recently).
>
>BTW, So the JS.swc is working in FB ok?
Haven’t gotten that far yet. Need the Falcon build to pass and work in
the Installer. Should find out today.
-Alex
Re: [FalconJX][FlexJS] JS.SWC in Nightly Build (was [DISCUSS] Release
Apache Flex Installer 3.2)
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
OK, got rid of the CSS. The JS output now looks like:
/**
* Main
*
* @fileoverview
*
* @suppress {checkTypes}
*/
goog.provide('Main');
/**
* @constructor
*/
Main = function() {
};
/**
* @expose
*/
Main.prototype.start = function() {
var self = this;
var /** @type {Element} */ element = document.createElement("button");
element.onclick = function() {
alert("Hello browser from FalconJX!");
};
element.textContent = "Say Hello";
document.body.appendChild(element);
};
/**
* Metadata
*
* @type {Object.<string, Array.<Object>>}
*/
Main.prototype.FLEXJS_CLASS_INFO = { names: [{ name: 'Main', qName:
'Main'}] };
// Ensures the symbol will be visible after compiler renaming.
goog.exportSymbol('Main', Main);
Have fun,
-Alex
On 6/14/15, 10:04 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>OK, I believe that if you go and install the FlexJS Nightly, you can go to
>the folder where you installed it and type:
>
>On OSX:
> js/bin/jsc path/to/Main.as
>
>On Windows:
> js\bin\jsc.bat path\to\Main.as
>
>And you’ll get a JS file out. The JS file has some extra CSS stuffed on
>the end that I’m going to try to remove tonight. Also, on Windows, you
>may need to make sure that jsc.bat is using Java 1.7 or later. The
>Installer sometime finds old Java 1.6 installs.
>
>The Main.as I tried looks like this:
>
>package
>{
> public class Main
> {
> public function start():void
> {
> var element:Element = document.createElement("button");
> element.onclick = function ():void {
> alert("Hello browser from FalconJX!");
> };
> element.textContent = "Say Hello";
> document.body.appendChild(element);
> }
> }
>}
>
>
>I haven’t tried all this in FB yet. I would think you would have to
>create an ActionScript project and add JS.swc, which is currently in
>js/libs/temp/externals/bin. I might move the swc up under js/libs soon.
>
>The JS output will have goog.provide, goog.require and goog.inherit in it,
>and org.apache.flex.utils.Language if you used “is” or “as”. This is what
>I plan to use to write the JS code for FlexJS, and once your test gets
>more sophisticated, you’ll need some sort of dependency management and
>subclassing scheme. This will hopefully make it easier for folks to see
>where we might swap out the goog stuff for alternatives.
>
>Let us know if it doesn’t work for you.
>
>-Alex
>
Re: [FalconJX][FlexJS] JS.SWC in Nightly Build (was [DISCUSS] Release
Apache Flex Installer 3.2)
Posted by Michael Schmalle <te...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 6/15/15, 2:53 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Let us know if it doesn’t work for you.
> >
> >Alex, Is this post aimed at me?
>
> No, hopefully there are other folks trying this stuff out.
>
Haha, this is a funny thought. Yeah or it's like 3 or 4 of us talking to
each other.
>
> >
> >I knew the dependency thing was going to have to be worked out, the AMD
> >emitter collects deps, static and other things. The Randori emitter also
> >had a way to collect deps.
>
> IMO, dependencies are already collected, that’s how we spit out the
> correct goog.requires. See FlexJSProject and GoogDepsWriter. I haven’t
> looked at the other JS dependency systems, but hopefully they map easily
> to the data we have.
>
>
Just testing you, I know about that stuff. :)
> -Alex
>
>
Re: [FalconJX][FlexJS] JS.SWC in Nightly Build (was [DISCUSS] Release
Apache Flex Installer 3.2)
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 6/15/15, 2:53 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Let us know if it doesn’t work for you.
>
>Alex, Is this post aimed at me?
No, hopefully there are other folks trying this stuff out.
>
>I knew the dependency thing was going to have to be worked out, the AMD
>emitter collects deps, static and other things. The Randori emitter also
>had a way to collect deps.
IMO, dependencies are already collected, that’s how we spit out the
correct goog.requires. See FlexJSProject and GoogDepsWriter. I haven’t
looked at the other JS dependency systems, but hopefully they map easily
to the data we have.
-Alex
Re: [FalconJX][FlexJS] JS.SWC in Nightly Build (was [DISCUSS] Release
Apache Flex Installer 3.2)
Posted by Michael Schmalle <te...@gmail.com>.
> Let us know if it doesn’t work for you.
Alex, Is this post aimed at me?
I knew the dependency thing was going to have to be worked out, the AMD
emitter collects deps, static and other things. The Randori emitter also
had a way to collect deps.
I might actually just implement the Randori version since it keeps a model
of various things and would allow the emitter to do it's job during the
emit phase.
If it worked good, I have to look at it again, I can just move the goog
specific stuff into a dependency emitter or something.
Mike
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> OK, I believe that if you go and install the FlexJS Nightly, you can go to
> the folder where you installed it and type:
>
> On OSX:
> js/bin/jsc path/to/Main.as
>
> On Windows:
> js\bin\jsc.bat path\to\Main.as
>
> And you’ll get a JS file out. The JS file has some extra CSS stuffed on
> the end that I’m going to try to remove tonight. Also, on Windows, you
> may need to make sure that jsc.bat is using Java 1.7 or later. The
> Installer sometime finds old Java 1.6 installs.
>
> The Main.as I tried looks like this:
>
> package
> {
> public class Main
> {
> public function start():void
> {
> var element:Element = document.createElement("button");
> element.onclick = function ():void {
> alert("Hello browser from FalconJX!");
> };
> element.textContent = "Say Hello";
> document.body.appendChild(element);
> }
> }
> }
>
>
> I haven’t tried all this in FB yet. I would think you would have to
> create an ActionScript project and add JS.swc, which is currently in
> js/libs/temp/externals/bin. I might move the swc up under js/libs soon.
>
> The JS output will have goog.provide, goog.require and goog.inherit in it,
> and org.apache.flex.utils.Language if you used “is” or “as”. This is what
> I plan to use to write the JS code for FlexJS, and once your test gets
> more sophisticated, you’ll need some sort of dependency management and
> subclassing scheme. This will hopefully make it easier for folks to see
> where we might swap out the goog stuff for alternatives.
>
> Let us know if it doesn’t work for you.
>
> -Alex
>
>
Re: [FalconJX][FlexJS] JS.SWC in Nightly Build (was [DISCUSS] Release
Apache Flex Installer 3.2)
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
OK, I believe that if you go and install the FlexJS Nightly, you can go to
the folder where you installed it and type:
On OSX:
js/bin/jsc path/to/Main.as
On Windows:
js\bin\jsc.bat path\to\Main.as
And you’ll get a JS file out. The JS file has some extra CSS stuffed on
the end that I’m going to try to remove tonight. Also, on Windows, you
may need to make sure that jsc.bat is using Java 1.7 or later. The
Installer sometime finds old Java 1.6 installs.
The Main.as I tried looks like this:
package
{
public class Main
{
public function start():void
{
var element:Element = document.createElement("button");
element.onclick = function ():void {
alert("Hello browser from FalconJX!");
};
element.textContent = "Say Hello";
document.body.appendChild(element);
}
}
}
I haven’t tried all this in FB yet. I would think you would have to
create an ActionScript project and add JS.swc, which is currently in
js/libs/temp/externals/bin. I might move the swc up under js/libs soon.
The JS output will have goog.provide, goog.require and goog.inherit in it,
and org.apache.flex.utils.Language if you used “is” or “as”. This is what
I plan to use to write the JS code for FlexJS, and once your test gets
more sophisticated, you’ll need some sort of dependency management and
subclassing scheme. This will hopefully make it easier for folks to see
where we might swap out the goog stuff for alternatives.
Let us know if it doesn’t work for you.
-Alex
Re: [FalconJX][FlexJS] JS.SWC in Nightly Build (was [DISCUSS] Release
Apache Flex Installer 3.2)
Posted by Michael Schmalle <te...@gmail.com>.
Hmm, In retrospect, I don't know if I am doing this right. This is what I
get for not having JS experience. :)
I know I am creating the packages right but I guess access wise, I don't
need it... The cross compiler should just resolve these things like you do
with qualifiedNames.
I guess I need to stop for a while. :)
Well that part only took me 30 minutes, it was figuring out all the
package/namespace object literal stuff.
Let me know if you see any flaws in my thinking.
Mike
Mike
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Michael Schmalle <teotigraphixllc@gmail.com
> wrote:
> Well I have just tested the boundaries of what will compile to a swc. Wow,
> I SERIOUSLY did not think I was going to figure this out but a good puzzle
> is always good for the brain.
>
> (sorry for the code but I am trying to explain something)
>
> /**
> * namespace
> * @const
> */
> var chrome = {};
>
> /** @const */
> chrome.app = {};
>
> /**
> * @type {boolean}
> */
> chrome.app.isInstalled;
>
> /**
> * @const
> */
> chrome.webstore = {};
>
> /**
> * @const
> */
> chrome.runtime = {};
>
> /** @type {!Object|undefined} */
> chrome.runtime.lastError = {};
>
> /** @type {string|undefined} */
> chrome.runtime.lastError.message;
>
>
> Long story short, chrome, chrome.app, chrome.webstore, chrome.runtime
> are Literal Classes(Object Literals). I spent 3 hours thinking about how
> the hell this was going to be possible with code completion. I studied the
> problem and realized I need to make classes for all namespace object
> literals.
>
> Then, chrome is a root level namespace so it's app, webstore and runtime
> instances need to be static. Then I couldn't access the next in line
> lastError from chrome.runtime. So a non root level var needs to be non
> static, then every other property/var up the chain needs to be non static.
>
> So the outcome is, I have 4 passes in the compiler now and I got it to
> work! Crazy enough the COMPC compiler actually compiles this mess. The
> classes are the same name as the package name it's next to. :)
>
> The only problem is IJ wants to optimize it to an import which is
> incorrect but, hey it's works.
>
> "I think" this means I am close to getting packages to work. I will have
> to try a lot more tests before I feel like I have this working for
> different situations.
>
> Image of the emitted class and code;
>
> http://snag.gy/XzveF.jpg
>
> Mike
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 6/12/15, 9:00 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <te...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >You know, I am being an idiot, I can work on compilers but it the simple
>> >things that confuse me. What is the correct way to test nightlies of
>> >FlexJS? I tried building the installer.xml in flex-asjs and it totally
>> >screwed up the folder.
>> >
>> >So what should I have setup to test the compiler with FlexJS projects?
>>
>> Run the Installer, or grab the binary package, unzip it and run
>> installer.xml in that.
>>
>> When just doing dev work without FB integration, I just point some
>> environment variables at the Falcon repo and use Ant to compile the
>> examples.
>>
>> I’m off-line for the rest of the AM. Hopefully others can help you get
>> unstuck.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>>
>
Re: [FalconJX][FlexJS] JS.SWC in Nightly Build (was [DISCUSS] Release
Apache Flex Installer 3.2)
Posted by Michael Schmalle <te...@gmail.com>.
Well I have just tested the boundaries of what will compile to a swc. Wow,
I SERIOUSLY did not think I was going to figure this out but a good puzzle
is always good for the brain.
(sorry for the code but I am trying to explain something)
/**
* namespace
* @const
*/
var chrome = {};
/** @const */
chrome.app = {};
/**
* @type {boolean}
*/
chrome.app.isInstalled;
/**
* @const
*/
chrome.webstore = {};
/**
* @const
*/
chrome.runtime = {};
/** @type {!Object|undefined} */
chrome.runtime.lastError = {};
/** @type {string|undefined} */
chrome.runtime.lastError.message;
Long story short, chrome, chrome.app, chrome.webstore, chrome.runtime are
Literal Classes(Object Literals). I spent 3 hours thinking about how the
hell this was going to be possible with code completion. I studied the
problem and realized I need to make classes for all namespace object
literals.
Then, chrome is a root level namespace so it's app, webstore and runtime
instances need to be static. Then I couldn't access the next in line
lastError from chrome.runtime. So a non root level var needs to be non
static, then every other property/var up the chain needs to be non static.
So the outcome is, I have 4 passes in the compiler now and I got it to
work! Crazy enough the COMPC compiler actually compiles this mess. The
classes are the same name as the package name it's next to. :)
The only problem is IJ wants to optimize it to an import which is incorrect
but, hey it's works.
"I think" this means I am close to getting packages to work. I will have to
try a lot more tests before I feel like I have this working for different
situations.
Image of the emitted class and code;
http://snag.gy/XzveF.jpg
Mike
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 6/12/15, 9:00 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >You know, I am being an idiot, I can work on compilers but it the simple
> >things that confuse me. What is the correct way to test nightlies of
> >FlexJS? I tried building the installer.xml in flex-asjs and it totally
> >screwed up the folder.
> >
> >So what should I have setup to test the compiler with FlexJS projects?
>
> Run the Installer, or grab the binary package, unzip it and run
> installer.xml in that.
>
> When just doing dev work without FB integration, I just point some
> environment variables at the Falcon repo and use Ant to compile the
> examples.
>
> I’m off-line for the rest of the AM. Hopefully others can help you get
> unstuck.
>
> -Alex
>
>
Re: [FalconJX][FlexJS] JS.SWC in Nightly Build (was [DISCUSS] Release
Apache Flex Installer 3.2)
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 6/12/15, 9:00 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>You know, I am being an idiot, I can work on compilers but it the simple
>things that confuse me. What is the correct way to test nightlies of
>FlexJS? I tried building the installer.xml in flex-asjs and it totally
>screwed up the folder.
>
>So what should I have setup to test the compiler with FlexJS projects?
Run the Installer, or grab the binary package, unzip it and run
installer.xml in that.
When just doing dev work without FB integration, I just point some
environment variables at the Falcon repo and use Ant to compile the
examples.
I’m off-line for the rest of the AM. Hopefully others can help you get
unstuck.
-Alex
Re: [FalconJX][FlexJS] JS.SWC in Nightly Build (was [DISCUSS] Release
Apache Flex Installer 3.2)
Posted by Michael Schmalle <te...@gmail.com>.
You know, I am being an idiot, I can work on compilers but it the simple
things that confuse me. What is the correct way to test nightlies of
FlexJS? I tried building the installer.xml in flex-asjs and it totally
screwed up the folder.
So what should I have setup to test the compiler with FlexJS projects?
Mike
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Michael Schmalle <
teotigraphixllc@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, I am confused again. I thought with FlexJS you were required to have a
> Main.mxml file, not .as, am I wrong?
>
> BTW, So the JS.swc is working in FB ok?
>
> Mike
>
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> I didn’t try MXML, just AS.
>>
>> On 6/12/15, 8:42 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <te...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Alex, so did the initial jsc require an MXML file for the main? So the
>> way
>> >it is now, we can pass an mxml or as main file and it will basically
>> treat
>> >them the same but, JS.swc is added to the library path for DOM features,
>> >correct?
>> >
>> >Mike
>> >
>> >On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 6/12/15, 7:39 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <te...@gmail.com>
>> >>wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >Ah yeah ok I get that but it was more about the "refactoring the
>> >>Installer
>> >> >source for the Git-Split", I wasn't explicit about that.
>> >>
>> >> The Installer is in the flex-utilities repo along with many other
>> >> “products” like Squiggly and Tour De Flex and Mavenizer and really,
>> they
>> >> should each have their own repo. But we have to put all code destined
>> >>for
>> >> a new repo under a single top-level folder.
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >So do you have it automatically adding JS.swc to any build in FlexJS?
>> >>Or
>> >> >is
>> >> >the 'jsc' to including the JS.swc, I am not good at understanding this
>> >> >stuff yet.
>> >>
>> >> JS.swc is in the FalconJX Nightly, and I hope the next time the Falcon
>> >> build passes the additional scripts will be in the right place and run
>> >> correctly when Falcon gets installed as part of the FlexJS install.
>> >>
>> >> -Alex
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>
Re: [FalconJX][FlexJS] JS.SWC in Nightly Build (was [DISCUSS] Release
Apache Flex Installer 3.2)
Posted by Michael Schmalle <te...@gmail.com>.
Ok, I am confused again. I thought with FlexJS you were required to have a
Main.mxml file, not .as, am I wrong?
BTW, So the JS.swc is working in FB ok?
Mike
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> I didn’t try MXML, just AS.
>
> On 6/12/15, 8:42 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Alex, so did the initial jsc require an MXML file for the main? So the way
> >it is now, we can pass an mxml or as main file and it will basically treat
> >them the same but, JS.swc is added to the library path for DOM features,
> >correct?
> >
> >Mike
> >
> >On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 6/12/15, 7:39 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <te...@gmail.com>
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >Ah yeah ok I get that but it was more about the "refactoring the
> >>Installer
> >> >source for the Git-Split", I wasn't explicit about that.
> >>
> >> The Installer is in the flex-utilities repo along with many other
> >> “products” like Squiggly and Tour De Flex and Mavenizer and really, they
> >> should each have their own repo. But we have to put all code destined
> >>for
> >> a new repo under a single top-level folder.
> >>
> >> >
> >> >So do you have it automatically adding JS.swc to any build in FlexJS?
> >>Or
> >> >is
> >> >the 'jsc' to including the JS.swc, I am not good at understanding this
> >> >stuff yet.
> >>
> >> JS.swc is in the FalconJX Nightly, and I hope the next time the Falcon
> >> build passes the additional scripts will be in the right place and run
> >> correctly when Falcon gets installed as part of the FlexJS install.
> >>
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: [FalconJX][FlexJS] JS.SWC in Nightly Build (was [DISCUSS] Release
Apache Flex Installer 3.2)
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
I didn’t try MXML, just AS.
On 6/12/15, 8:42 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Alex, so did the initial jsc require an MXML file for the main? So the way
>it is now, we can pass an mxml or as main file and it will basically treat
>them the same but, JS.swc is added to the library path for DOM features,
>correct?
>
>Mike
>
>On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 6/12/15, 7:39 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <te...@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Ah yeah ok I get that but it was more about the "refactoring the
>>Installer
>> >source for the Git-Split", I wasn't explicit about that.
>>
>> The Installer is in the flex-utilities repo along with many other
>> “products” like Squiggly and Tour De Flex and Mavenizer and really, they
>> should each have their own repo. But we have to put all code destined
>>for
>> a new repo under a single top-level folder.
>>
>> >
>> >So do you have it automatically adding JS.swc to any build in FlexJS?
>>Or
>> >is
>> >the 'jsc' to including the JS.swc, I am not good at understanding this
>> >stuff yet.
>>
>> JS.swc is in the FalconJX Nightly, and I hope the next time the Falcon
>> build passes the additional scripts will be in the right place and run
>> correctly when Falcon gets installed as part of the FlexJS install.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>>
Re: [FalconJX][FlexJS] JS.SWC in Nightly Build (was [DISCUSS] Release
Apache Flex Installer 3.2)
Posted by Michael Schmalle <te...@gmail.com>.
Alex, so did the initial jsc require an MXML file for the main? So the way
it is now, we can pass an mxml or as main file and it will basically treat
them the same but, JS.swc is added to the library path for DOM features,
correct?
Mike
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 6/12/15, 7:39 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >Ah yeah ok I get that but it was more about the "refactoring the Installer
> >source for the Git-Split", I wasn't explicit about that.
>
> The Installer is in the flex-utilities repo along with many other
> “products” like Squiggly and Tour De Flex and Mavenizer and really, they
> should each have their own repo. But we have to put all code destined for
> a new repo under a single top-level folder.
>
> >
> >So do you have it automatically adding JS.swc to any build in FlexJS? Or
> >is
> >the 'jsc' to including the JS.swc, I am not good at understanding this
> >stuff yet.
>
> JS.swc is in the FalconJX Nightly, and I hope the next time the Falcon
> build passes the additional scripts will be in the right place and run
> correctly when Falcon gets installed as part of the FlexJS install.
>
> -Alex
>
>
Re: [FalconJX][FlexJS] JS.SWC in Nightly Build (was [DISCUSS] Release
Apache Flex Installer 3.2)
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 6/12/15, 7:39 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>Ah yeah ok I get that but it was more about the "refactoring the Installer
>source for the Git-Split", I wasn't explicit about that.
The Installer is in the flex-utilities repo along with many other
“products” like Squiggly and Tour De Flex and Mavenizer and really, they
should each have their own repo. But we have to put all code destined for
a new repo under a single top-level folder.
>
>So do you have it automatically adding JS.swc to any build in FlexJS? Or
>is
>the 'jsc' to including the JS.swc, I am not good at understanding this
>stuff yet.
JS.swc is in the FalconJX Nightly, and I hope the next time the Falcon
build passes the additional scripts will be in the right place and run
correctly when Falcon gets installed as part of the FlexJS install.
-Alex
Re: [FalconJX][FlexJS] JS.SWC in Nightly Build (was [DISCUSS] Release
Apache Flex Installer 3.2)
Posted by Michael Schmalle <te...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 6/12/15, 7:02 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>Doing the RC is still behind trying to get Mike’s JS.swc in the FlexJS
> >> Nightly and refactoring the Installer source for the Git-Split.
> >
> >
> >
> >Alex, what does this mean?
> >
> >Mike
> >
>
> That folks can install FlexJS Nightly, run js/bin/jsc MyASFile.as and get
> js files out.
>
Ah yeah ok I get that but it was more about the "refactoring the Installer
source for the Git-Split", I wasn't explicit about that.
So do you have it automatically adding JS.swc to any build in FlexJS? Or is
the 'jsc' to including the JS.swc, I am not good at understanding this
stuff yet.
Mike
>
> -Alex
>
>