You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to netcat@netbeans.apache.org by paloris_J <pa...@gmail.com> on 2018/08/26 12:47:16 UTC
Is list still going
I notice that on the archives that there is no new emails
Re: Is list still going
Posted by paloris_J <pa...@gmail.com>.
I just had a look at your url. It looks really good.
I had it running in nb 9rc1 under java 8 and tryed out some of what you
said.
But then downloaded
Product Version: Apache NetBeans IDE 9.0 (Build
incubator-netbeans-release-334-on-20180708)
Java: 10.0.1; Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 10.0.1+10
And the options of installing java web and java ee are not avaliable.
I was thinking about doing a web cast with some of the examples that
you gave
On 28/08/18 16:43, Rick Hegarty wrote:
> Glenn,
>
> You raise a good point regarding the state of our test specifications, and
> it had been on my mind as well. I updated the Test Specifications for Unit
> Testing (JUnit and TestNG) during Release 9.0 testing, but they still need
> further work:
>
> - The JUnit tests (
> https://netbeans-vm.apache.org/synergy/client/app/#/specification/390/v/2)
> take too long and need to be reduced. They also need to support JUnit 5
> functionality.
> - The TestNG tests (
> https://netbeans-vm.apache.org/synergy/client/app/#/title/testng_test_specification/)
> need to be expanded, and support TestNG 6 functionality.
>
> I'll volunteer to work on those, but anyone else is welcome to participate
> - just let me know.
>
> I'd also thought about creating additional Test Specifications for other
> testing frameworks such as Spock and Mockito, but I invite feedback and
> approval on that idea before we proceed. Perhaps they are not used enough
> to merit Test Specifications?
>
> It is also important that we have volunteers for peer review of any new or
> updated test specifications. We don't want to be discovering that those
> test specifications are inadequate during 9.1 testing!
>
> Rick
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 9:17 AM Glenn Holmer <ce...@kolabnow.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> On 08/26/2018 07:47 AM, paloris_J wrote:
>>> I notice that on the archives that there is no new emails
>>
>> NetCAT for 9.0 has completed, so that's perfectly normal.
>>
>> But it's never too early to start thinking about the next NetCAT,
>> especially with the shorter release cycle NetBeans will be undertaking.
>> My own concern is with the test specifications, which had gotten out of
>> date over the years. Now we NetBeans users are responsible for all of
>> this ourselves. In the Profiler tribe, there was not even time to update
>> all of the specs to reflect the current functionality of NetBeans.
>>
>> Are we comfortable with these specifications now? Are they the best way
>> to test NetBeans releases? What should we be doing ahead of time to
>> prepare for the next NetCAT? And most importantly, what is the role of
>> NetCAT in the new Apache world of NetBeans? How should NetCAT fit into
>> the development and release process?
>>
>> I'd be curious to hear people's opinions on these questions.
>>
>> --
>> Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682)
>> "After the vintage season came the aftermath -- and Cenbe."
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
>>
>> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>>
>>
>
Re: Is list still going
Posted by Rick Hegarty <sk...@gmail.com>.
Glenn,
You raise a good point regarding the state of our test specifications, and
it had been on my mind as well. I updated the Test Specifications for Unit
Testing (JUnit and TestNG) during Release 9.0 testing, but they still need
further work:
- The JUnit tests (
https://netbeans-vm.apache.org/synergy/client/app/#/specification/390/v/2)
take too long and need to be reduced. They also need to support JUnit 5
functionality.
- The TestNG tests (
https://netbeans-vm.apache.org/synergy/client/app/#/title/testng_test_specification/)
need to be expanded, and support TestNG 6 functionality.
I'll volunteer to work on those, but anyone else is welcome to participate
- just let me know.
I'd also thought about creating additional Test Specifications for other
testing frameworks such as Spock and Mockito, but I invite feedback and
approval on that idea before we proceed. Perhaps they are not used enough
to merit Test Specifications?
It is also important that we have volunteers for peer review of any new or
updated test specifications. We don't want to be discovering that those
test specifications are inadequate during 9.1 testing!
Rick
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 9:17 AM Glenn Holmer <ce...@kolabnow.com.invalid>
wrote:
> On 08/26/2018 07:47 AM, paloris_J wrote:
> > I notice that on the archives that there is no new emails
>
> NetCAT for 9.0 has completed, so that's perfectly normal.
>
> But it's never too early to start thinking about the next NetCAT,
> especially with the shorter release cycle NetBeans will be undertaking.
> My own concern is with the test specifications, which had gotten out of
> date over the years. Now we NetBeans users are responsible for all of
> this ourselves. In the Profiler tribe, there was not even time to update
> all of the specs to reflect the current functionality of NetBeans.
>
> Are we comfortable with these specifications now? Are they the best way
> to test NetBeans releases? What should we be doing ahead of time to
> prepare for the next NetCAT? And most importantly, what is the role of
> NetCAT in the new Apache world of NetBeans? How should NetCAT fit into
> the development and release process?
>
> I'd be curious to hear people's opinions on these questions.
>
> --
> Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682)
> "After the vintage season came the aftermath -- and Cenbe."
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>
Re: Is list still going
Posted by Glenn Holmer <ce...@kolabnow.com.INVALID>.
On 08/26/2018 07:47 AM, paloris_J wrote:
> I notice that on the archives that there is no new emails
NetCAT for 9.0 has completed, so that's perfectly normal.
But it's never too early to start thinking about the next NetCAT,
especially with the shorter release cycle NetBeans will be undertaking.
My own concern is with the test specifications, which had gotten out of
date over the years. Now we NetBeans users are responsible for all of
this ourselves. In the Profiler tribe, there was not even time to update
all of the specs to reflect the current functionality of NetBeans.
Are we comfortable with these specifications now? Are they the best way
to test NetBeans releases? What should we be doing ahead of time to
prepare for the next NetCAT? And most importantly, what is the role of
NetCAT in the new Apache world of NetBeans? How should NetCAT fit into
the development and release process?
I'd be curious to hear people's opinions on these questions.
--
Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682)
"After the vintage season came the aftermath -- and Cenbe."
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists