You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> on 2012/12/03 11:13:38 UTC
Time for 7.0.34
There isn't much in the 7.0.x change log but it is the start of the
month so I'm starting the 7.0.34 release process. The plan, as always is:
- fix any open bugs
- check the unit tests and TCKs
- tag
- vote
- hopefully release
Best guess right now is that I'll be tagging 7.0.34 tomorrow.
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Time for 7.0.34
Posted by Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>.
On 03.12.2012 11:13, Mark Thomas wrote:
> There isn't much in the 7.0.x change log but it is the start of the
> month so I'm starting the 7.0.34 release process. The plan, as always is:
> - fix any open bugs
> - check the unit tests and TCKs
> - tag
> - vote
> - hopefully release
>
> Best guess right now is that I'll be tagging 7.0.34 tomorrow.
Thanks for the notice.
I right now added an additional check to the small new renameOnRotate
ALV feature (off by default). If there's no negative review I don't plan
more changes to the TC 7 variant.
Regards,
Rainer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [OT] was Re: Time for 7.0.34
Posted by Jess Holle <je...@ptc.com>.
On 12/3/2012 5:39 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 03.12.2012 12:27, Jess Holle wrote:
>> On 12/3/2012 5:09 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 03/12/2012 11:00, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>>>> 1. I think we need to switch over to the recently released Daemon
>>>> 1.0.11.
>>> There is a regression that needs to be fixed. I think we should wait for
>>> 1.0.12.
>> Can you elaborate on the regression? [Having just moved to procrun
>> 1.0.11 for something else, I'm quite interested.]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-268
>
> Also https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-245 was solved
> incompletely, so https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-269 was
> raised. That one isn't a regression/showstopper though.
So for procrun, 269 is of interest, but not a regression, and 1.0.11
will do for now. [1.0.11 was key in actually allowing automatic
restart, etc, actions upon service failure.]
Thanks.
--
Jess Holle
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [OT] was Re: Time for 7.0.34
Posted by Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>.
On 03.12.2012 12:27, Jess Holle wrote:
> On 12/3/2012 5:09 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 03/12/2012 11:00, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>>> 1. I think we need to switch over to the recently released Daemon
>>> 1.0.11.
>> There is a regression that needs to be fixed. I think we should wait for
>> 1.0.12.
> Can you elaborate on the regression? [Having just moved to procrun
> 1.0.11 for something else, I'm quite interested.]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-268
Also https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-245 was solved
incompletely, so https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-269 was
raised. That one isn't a regression/showstopper though.
Regards,
Rainer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
[OT] was Re: Time for 7.0.34
Posted by Jess Holle <je...@ptc.com>.
On 12/3/2012 5:09 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 03/12/2012 11:00, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> 1. I think we need to switch over to the recently released Daemon 1.0.11.
> There is a regression that needs to be fixed. I think we should wait for
> 1.0.12.
Can you elaborate on the regression? [Having just moved to procrun
1.0.11 for something else, I'm quite interested.]
--
Jess Holle
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Time for 7.0.34
Posted by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>.
On 03/12/2012 11:00, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/12/3 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>:
>> There isn't much in the 7.0.x change log but it is the start of the
>> month so I'm starting the 7.0.34 release process. The plan, as always is:
>> - fix any open bugs
>> - check the unit tests and TCKs
>> - tag
>> - vote
>> - hopefully release
>>
>> Best guess right now is that I'll be tagging 7.0.34 tomorrow.
>>
>
> OK.
>
> 1. I think we need to switch over to the recently released Daemon 1.0.11.
There is a regression that needs to be fixed. I think we should wait for
1.0.12.
> 2. There are a number of issues filed for jdbc-pool. It is not a
> stopper, but it might be worth looking at them.
I don't usually look at the jdbc-pool bugs when I do a release.
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Time for 7.0.34
Posted by Konstantin Kolinko <kn...@gmail.com>.
2012/12/3 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>:
> There isn't much in the 7.0.x change log but it is the start of the
> month so I'm starting the 7.0.34 release process. The plan, as always is:
> - fix any open bugs
> - check the unit tests and TCKs
> - tag
> - vote
> - hopefully release
>
> Best guess right now is that I'll be tagging 7.0.34 tomorrow.
>
OK.
1. I think we need to switch over to the recently released Daemon 1.0.11.
2. There are a number of issues filed for jdbc-pool. It is not a
stopper, but it might be worth looking at them.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org