You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by si...@insession.com on 2005/07/21 08:30:33 UTC

Comment in j2ee-server-plan.xml about jetty in M4

Should the comment below be removed from the file?  If not, can someone 
explain where Jetty is involved here. 

Should we be able to run M4 with tomcat without any jetty use at all? 

<!-- HTTP/SOAP Protocol is now run through jetty-->

Thanks,

John

Re: Comment in j2ee-server-plan.xml about jetty in M4

Posted by si...@insession.com.
OK, I'll remove it.

Thanks.

This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential, 
proprietary or non-public information.  This information is intended 
solely for the designated recipient(s).  If an addressing or transmission 
error has misdirected this e-mail, please notify the sender immediately 
and destroy this e-mail.  Any review, dissemination, use or reliance upon 
this information by unintended recipients is prohibited.  Any opinions 
expressed in this e-mail are those of the author personally.

David Jencks <dj...@gluecode.com> wrote on 21/07/2005 04:36:51 PM:

> yes, remove it.  that's very historical :-)
> At one time there was a primitive soap listener in openejb.  Then there 
> was a special port for ws on jetty.  now ws runs through the normal web 
> port, either jetty or tomcat.
> 
> david jencks
> 
> On Jul 20, 2005, at 11:30 PM, sissonj@insession.com wrote:
> 
> > Should the comment below be removed from the file?  If not, can 
someone
> > explain where Jetty is involved here.
> >
> > Should we be able to run M4 with tomcat without any jetty use at all?
> >
> > <!-- HTTP/SOAP Protocol is now run through jetty-->
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > John
> >
>

Re: Comment in j2ee-server-plan.xml about jetty in M4

Posted by David Jencks <dj...@gluecode.com>.
yes, remove it.  that's very historical :-)
At one time there was a primitive soap listener in openejb.  Then there 
was a special port for ws on jetty.  now ws runs through the normal web 
port, either jetty or tomcat.

david jencks

On Jul 20, 2005, at 11:30 PM, sissonj@insession.com wrote:

> Should the comment below be removed from the file?  If not, can someone
> explain where Jetty is involved here.
>
> Should we be able to run M4 with tomcat without any jetty use at all?
>
> <!-- HTTP/SOAP Protocol is now run through jetty-->
>
> Thanks,
>
> John
>

Re: Comment in j2ee-server-plan.xml about jetty in M4

Posted by Jeff Genender <jg...@savoirtech.com>.
I would think it should be removed or at least moved to he appropriate 
config file if need be.

Jeff

sissonj@insession.com wrote:
> Should the comment below be removed from the file?  If not, can someone 
> explain where Jetty is involved here. 
> 
> Should we be able to run M4 with tomcat without any jetty use at all? 
> 
> <!-- HTTP/SOAP Protocol is now run through jetty-->
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> John