You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com> on 2012/03/06 09:17:58 UTC
[RESULT] [VOTE] Codename for the jr3 implementation effort (Was:
[jr3] Codename)
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thus, please vote on which of these two codenames we should use for
> the jr3 implementation effort:
>
> [ ] Blackrabbit
> [ ] Oak
>
> The vote is open until Monday, after which I'll use the name with most
> support to set up subproject infrastructure as described in [1].
The vote results are as follows:
+4 Blackrabbit
+7 Oak
Meanwhile the Doodle poll has evolved to show +16 to Blackrabbit and
+17 for Oak.
Oak has the advantage and so we'll go with that. I'll set up the new
mailing list, issue tracker and svn space in a moment. Any volunteers
to join as moderators for the mailing list?
As discussed earlier and mentioned again by Roy, the Oak name is a bit
troublesome for more general branding, which reinforces the point that
we'll use it as a codename for the development effort and decide later
on whether to brand the result as "Jackrabbit 3" or something else.
BR,
Jukka Zitting