You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Jean-Daniel Cryans (Updated) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/02/13 20:01:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5393) Consider splitting after flushing

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Jean-Daniel Cryans updated HBASE-5393:
--------------------------------------

    Attachment: HBASE-2375-flush-split.patch

Patch that I posted in HBASE-2375 that Stack +1'd.
                
> Consider splitting after flushing
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-5393
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5393
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 0.90.5
>            Reporter: Jean-Daniel Cryans
>            Assignee: Jean-Daniel Cryans
>             Fix For: 0.94.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-2375-flush-split.patch
>
>
> Spawning this from HBASE-2375, I saw that it was much more efficient compaction-wise to check if we can split right after flushing. Much like the ideas that Jon spelled out in the description of that jira, the window is smaller because you don't have to compact and then split right away to only compact again when the daughters open.
> Another thing it improves is while we're normally waiting for the compaction to happen, data that's still coming in will make us go way past the MAX_FILESIZE to a point where for the first region I was seeing a store size 3-4x bigger before it was able to split.
> I targeted this for 0.94, but I'd like to get this into 0.92.1 or .2 too.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira