You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by ha...@t-online.de on 2007/02/02 18:53:17 UTC
RE: experience with borderware
>>
>> Stefan Jakobs [mailto:stefan.jakobs@rus.uni-stuttgart.de] said:
>>
>> > What are good and what are bad recipients. Is a client of
>> > borderware a good
>> > recipient and all other bad? And is a bounce with an attached
>> > SPAM-mail also
>> > SPAM? If you ask them at borderware, they 'll answer that you
>> > have to buy
>> > their appliance to get an answer.
>>
>> My guess is:
>>
>> Good recipient: validuser@example.com
>>
>> Bad recipient: nonexistentuser@example.com
>>
>> Bounces with attached spam are considered spam by Borderware - it's in
>> their FAQ:
>>
>> http://bsn.borderware.com/faq.php
>>
>> > > Do you run spamassassin against all outgoing mail?
>> >
>> > Yes, I do.
>> >
>> > > What do you do with high-scoring spam? If you're bouncing
>> > that instead
>> > > of sending it to /dev/null that might be the problem.
>> >
>> > Yes I bounce them, because I'm not allowed to change or
>> > discard mails of data privacy reasons.
>>
>> Bouncing emails is more of a data privacy concern than consigning them
>> to the bit bucket in the sky ever was, IMHO. And if your backscattered
>> bounced spam / malware ends up infecting another person's PC or them
>> becoming victims of a phishing scam, to what extent are you responsible
>> (well, not you personally, but your organisation)?
>>
>> Someone needs to get a clue somewhere.
>>
The clueless people who consider discarding mails as the criminal offense of mail theft are
called parliament in this country, and possibly congress or House in others...:)
As a service provider, you can either quarantine the stuff, send out quarantine notices,
and sweep the q area after a week,
or you can ask customers to sign a document that they are willing to have their mail filtered.
There are probably more users who want no spam than the other way round
Wolfgang