You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openwebbeans.apache.org by Gurkan Erdogdu <gu...@yahoo.com> on 2009/10/27 18:53:52 UTC
Using Interceptor/Decorator On Dependent Scoped Beans
Hi;
Does the 299 specification indicate that interceptors and decorators should
not be called for dependent scoped beans?
Currently we do not implement Interceptor/Decorator on @Dependent scoped beans in OWB because we do all interceptor/decorator stuff using proxy and @Dependent scoped beans do not require client proxy.
Does anyone has a good use case/example when dependent scoped beans are useful or necessary?
Thanks;
--Gurkan
Re: [weld-dev] Using Interceptor/Decorator On Dependent Scoped Beans
Posted by Gavin King <ga...@gmail.com>.
Yes, this is required and useful.
However, interceptors/decorators are not really intended to be applied
via the "client proxy" that the spec talks about. In fact, the spec is
written to allow the interception to be implemented without any
separate proxy object at all (using a subclass).
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu <gu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi;
>
>
> Does the 299 specification indicate that interceptors and decorators should
> not be called for dependent scoped beans?
>
> Currently we do not implement Interceptor/Decorator on @Dependent scoped
> beans in OWB because we do all interceptor/decorator stuff using proxy and
> @Dependent scoped beans do not require client proxy.
>
> Does anyone has a good use case/example when dependent scoped beans are
> useful or necessary?
>
> Thanks;
>
> --Gurkan
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> weld-dev mailing list
> weld-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
>
--
Gavin King
gavin.king@gmail.com
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
http://hibernate.org
http://seamframework.org
Re: Fw: [weld-dev] Using Interceptor/Decorator On Dependent Scoped Beans
Posted by Gurkan Erdogdu <gu...@yahoo.com>.
Hi;
Decorators and Interceptors are not applied to Decorators/Interceptors managed beans.
--Gurkan
________________________________
From: Sven Linstaedt <sv...@googlemail.com>
To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wed, October 28, 2009 11:06:13 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: [weld-dev] Using Interceptor/Decorator On Dependent Scoped Beans
From 8.1.2:
If a decorator applies to a managed bean, and the bean class is declared
final, the container automatically detects the problem and treats it as a
deployment problem, as defined in Section 12.4, “Problems detected
automatically by the container”.
I have not found something similar in the interceptor chapter, but regarding
the point interceptors and decorators can be handled technically in a
similar way, I believe this restriction also applies to interceptors.
br, Sven
2009/10/28 Gurkan Erdogdu <gu...@yahoo.com>
> Maybe using bytecode injection does the trick :)
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Joseph Bergmark <be...@gmail.com>
> To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tue, October 27, 2009 10:33:01 PM
> Subject: Re: Fw: [weld-dev] Using Interceptor/Decorator On Dependent Scoped
> Beans
>
> Perhaps I am misunderstanding, but if you use a subclass to implement
> interceptors/decorators doesn't that stop you from doing so on classes that
> are final? I know there is a proxy restriction on final classes, but not
> aware of a restriction on decorators/interceptors.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joe Bergmark
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdogdu@yahoo.com
> >wrote:
>
> >
> > FYI.
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Forwarded Message ----
> > From: Gavin King <ga...@gmail.com>
> > To: Gurkan Erdogdu <gu...@yahoo.com>
> > Cc: weld-dev@lists.jboss.org; openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Sent: Tue, October 27, 2009 8:49:53 PM
> > Subject: Re: [weld-dev] Using Interceptor/Decorator On Dependent Scoped
> > Beans
> >
> > Yes, this is required and useful.
> >
> > However, interceptors/decorators are not really intended to be applied
> > via the "client proxy" that the spec talks about. In fact, the spec is
> > written to allow the interception to be implemented without any
> > separate proxy object at all (using a subclass).
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdogdu@yahoo.com
> >
> > wrote:
> > > Hi;
> > >
> > >
> > > Does the 299 specification indicate that interceptors and decorators
> > should
> > > not be called for dependent scoped beans?
> > >
> > > Currently we do not implement Interceptor/Decorator on @Dependent
> scoped
> > > beans in OWB because we do all interceptor/decorator stuff using proxy
> > and
> > > @Dependent scoped beans do not require client proxy.
> > >
> > > Does anyone has a good use case/example when dependent scoped beans are
> > > useful or necessary?
> > >
> > > Thanks;
> > >
> > > --Gurkan
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > weld-dev mailing list
> > > weld-dev@lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Gavin King
> > gavin.king@gmail.com
> > http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
> > http://hibernate.org
> > http://seamframework.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
Re: Fw: [weld-dev] Using Interceptor/Decorator On Dependent Scoped
Beans
Posted by Joseph Bergmark <be...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Sven, this was the section I missed!
Sincerely,
Joe Bergmark
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:06 AM, Sven Linstaedt <
sven.linstaedt@googlemail.com> wrote:
> From 8.1.2:
>
> If a decorator applies to a managed bean, and the bean class is declared
> final, the container automatically detects the problem and treats it as a
> deployment problem, as defined in Section 12.4, “Problems detected
> automatically by the container”.
>
> I have not found something similar in the interceptor chapter, but
> regarding
> the point interceptors and decorators can be handled technically in a
> similar way, I believe this restriction also applies to interceptors.
>
> br, Sven
>
>
>
> 2009/10/28 Gurkan Erdogdu <gu...@yahoo.com>
>
> > Maybe using bytecode injection does the trick :)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Joseph Bergmark <be...@gmail.com>
> > To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Sent: Tue, October 27, 2009 10:33:01 PM
> > Subject: Re: Fw: [weld-dev] Using Interceptor/Decorator On Dependent
> Scoped
> > Beans
> >
> > Perhaps I am misunderstanding, but if you use a subclass to implement
> > interceptors/decorators doesn't that stop you from doing so on classes
> that
> > are final? I know there is a proxy restriction on final classes, but not
> > aware of a restriction on decorators/interceptors.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > Joe Bergmark
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdogdu@yahoo.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > FYI.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Forwarded Message ----
> > > From: Gavin King <ga...@gmail.com>
> > > To: Gurkan Erdogdu <gu...@yahoo.com>
> > > Cc: weld-dev@lists.jboss.org; openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > Sent: Tue, October 27, 2009 8:49:53 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [weld-dev] Using Interceptor/Decorator On Dependent Scoped
> > > Beans
> > >
> > > Yes, this is required and useful.
> > >
> > > However, interceptors/decorators are not really intended to be applied
> > > via the "client proxy" that the spec talks about. In fact, the spec is
> > > written to allow the interception to be implemented without any
> > > separate proxy object at all (using a subclass).
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu <
> gurkanerdogdu@yahoo.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hi;
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Does the 299 specification indicate that interceptors and decorators
> > > should
> > > > not be called for dependent scoped beans?
> > > >
> > > > Currently we do not implement Interceptor/Decorator on @Dependent
> > scoped
> > > > beans in OWB because we do all interceptor/decorator stuff using
> proxy
> > > and
> > > > @Dependent scoped beans do not require client proxy.
> > > >
> > > > Does anyone has a good use case/example when dependent scoped beans
> are
> > > > useful or necessary?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks;
> > > >
> > > > --Gurkan
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > weld-dev mailing list
> > > > weld-dev@lists.jboss.org
> > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Gavin King
> > > gavin.king@gmail.com
> > > http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
> > > http://hibernate.org
> > > http://seamframework.org
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: Fw: [weld-dev] Using Interceptor/Decorator On Dependent Scoped
Beans
Posted by Sven Linstaedt <sv...@googlemail.com>.
>From 8.1.2:
If a decorator applies to a managed bean, and the bean class is declared
final, the container automatically detects the problem and treats it as a
deployment problem, as defined in Section 12.4, “Problems detected
automatically by the container”.
I have not found something similar in the interceptor chapter, but regarding
the point interceptors and decorators can be handled technically in a
similar way, I believe this restriction also applies to interceptors.
br, Sven
2009/10/28 Gurkan Erdogdu <gu...@yahoo.com>
> Maybe using bytecode injection does the trick :)
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Joseph Bergmark <be...@gmail.com>
> To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tue, October 27, 2009 10:33:01 PM
> Subject: Re: Fw: [weld-dev] Using Interceptor/Decorator On Dependent Scoped
> Beans
>
> Perhaps I am misunderstanding, but if you use a subclass to implement
> interceptors/decorators doesn't that stop you from doing so on classes that
> are final? I know there is a proxy restriction on final classes, but not
> aware of a restriction on decorators/interceptors.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joe Bergmark
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdogdu@yahoo.com
> >wrote:
>
> >
> > FYI.
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Forwarded Message ----
> > From: Gavin King <ga...@gmail.com>
> > To: Gurkan Erdogdu <gu...@yahoo.com>
> > Cc: weld-dev@lists.jboss.org; openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Sent: Tue, October 27, 2009 8:49:53 PM
> > Subject: Re: [weld-dev] Using Interceptor/Decorator On Dependent Scoped
> > Beans
> >
> > Yes, this is required and useful.
> >
> > However, interceptors/decorators are not really intended to be applied
> > via the "client proxy" that the spec talks about. In fact, the spec is
> > written to allow the interception to be implemented without any
> > separate proxy object at all (using a subclass).
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdogdu@yahoo.com
> >
> > wrote:
> > > Hi;
> > >
> > >
> > > Does the 299 specification indicate that interceptors and decorators
> > should
> > > not be called for dependent scoped beans?
> > >
> > > Currently we do not implement Interceptor/Decorator on @Dependent
> scoped
> > > beans in OWB because we do all interceptor/decorator stuff using proxy
> > and
> > > @Dependent scoped beans do not require client proxy.
> > >
> > > Does anyone has a good use case/example when dependent scoped beans are
> > > useful or necessary?
> > >
> > > Thanks;
> > >
> > > --Gurkan
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > weld-dev mailing list
> > > weld-dev@lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Gavin King
> > gavin.king@gmail.com
> > http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
> > http://hibernate.org
> > http://seamframework.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
Re: Fw: [weld-dev] Using Interceptor/Decorator On Dependent Scoped Beans
Posted by Gurkan Erdogdu <gu...@yahoo.com>.
Maybe using bytecode injection does the trick :)
________________________________
From: Joseph Bergmark <be...@gmail.com>
To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tue, October 27, 2009 10:33:01 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: [weld-dev] Using Interceptor/Decorator On Dependent Scoped Beans
Perhaps I am misunderstanding, but if you use a subclass to implement
interceptors/decorators doesn't that stop you from doing so on classes that
are final? I know there is a proxy restriction on final classes, but not
aware of a restriction on decorators/interceptors.
Sincerely,
Joe Bergmark
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu <gu...@yahoo.com>wrote:
>
> FYI.
>
>
>
> ----- Forwarded Message ----
> From: Gavin King <ga...@gmail.com>
> To: Gurkan Erdogdu <gu...@yahoo.com>
> Cc: weld-dev@lists.jboss.org; openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tue, October 27, 2009 8:49:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [weld-dev] Using Interceptor/Decorator On Dependent Scoped
> Beans
>
> Yes, this is required and useful.
>
> However, interceptors/decorators are not really intended to be applied
> via the "client proxy" that the spec talks about. In fact, the spec is
> written to allow the interception to be implemented without any
> separate proxy object at all (using a subclass).
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu <gu...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi;
> >
> >
> > Does the 299 specification indicate that interceptors and decorators
> should
> > not be called for dependent scoped beans?
> >
> > Currently we do not implement Interceptor/Decorator on @Dependent scoped
> > beans in OWB because we do all interceptor/decorator stuff using proxy
> and
> > @Dependent scoped beans do not require client proxy.
> >
> > Does anyone has a good use case/example when dependent scoped beans are
> > useful or necessary?
> >
> > Thanks;
> >
> > --Gurkan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > weld-dev mailing list
> > weld-dev@lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Gavin King
> gavin.king@gmail.com
> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
> http://hibernate.org
> http://seamframework.org
>
>
>
>
Re: Fw: [weld-dev] Using Interceptor/Decorator On Dependent Scoped
Beans
Posted by Joseph Bergmark <be...@gmail.com>.
Perhaps I am misunderstanding, but if you use a subclass to implement
interceptors/decorators doesn't that stop you from doing so on classes that
are final? I know there is a proxy restriction on final classes, but not
aware of a restriction on decorators/interceptors.
Sincerely,
Joe Bergmark
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu <gu...@yahoo.com>wrote:
>
> FYI.
>
>
>
> ----- Forwarded Message ----
> From: Gavin King <ga...@gmail.com>
> To: Gurkan Erdogdu <gu...@yahoo.com>
> Cc: weld-dev@lists.jboss.org; openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tue, October 27, 2009 8:49:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [weld-dev] Using Interceptor/Decorator On Dependent Scoped
> Beans
>
> Yes, this is required and useful.
>
> However, interceptors/decorators are not really intended to be applied
> via the "client proxy" that the spec talks about. In fact, the spec is
> written to allow the interception to be implemented without any
> separate proxy object at all (using a subclass).
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu <gu...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi;
> >
> >
> > Does the 299 specification indicate that interceptors and decorators
> should
> > not be called for dependent scoped beans?
> >
> > Currently we do not implement Interceptor/Decorator on @Dependent scoped
> > beans in OWB because we do all interceptor/decorator stuff using proxy
> and
> > @Dependent scoped beans do not require client proxy.
> >
> > Does anyone has a good use case/example when dependent scoped beans are
> > useful or necessary?
> >
> > Thanks;
> >
> > --Gurkan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > weld-dev mailing list
> > weld-dev@lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Gavin King
> gavin.king@gmail.com
> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
> http://hibernate.org
> http://seamframework.org
>
>
>
>
Fw: [weld-dev] Using Interceptor/Decorator On Dependent Scoped Beans
Posted by Gurkan Erdogdu <gu...@yahoo.com>.
FYI.
----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Gavin King <ga...@gmail.com>
To: Gurkan Erdogdu <gu...@yahoo.com>
Cc: weld-dev@lists.jboss.org; openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tue, October 27, 2009 8:49:53 PM
Subject: Re: [weld-dev] Using Interceptor/Decorator On Dependent Scoped Beans
Yes, this is required and useful.
However, interceptors/decorators are not really intended to be applied
via the "client proxy" that the spec talks about. In fact, the spec is
written to allow the interception to be implemented without any
separate proxy object at all (using a subclass).
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu <gu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi;
>
>
> Does the 299 specification indicate that interceptors and decorators should
> not be called for dependent scoped beans?
>
> Currently we do not implement Interceptor/Decorator on @Dependent scoped
> beans in OWB because we do all interceptor/decorator stuff using proxy and
> @Dependent scoped beans do not require client proxy.
>
> Does anyone has a good use case/example when dependent scoped beans are
> useful or necessary?
>
> Thanks;
>
> --Gurkan
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> weld-dev mailing list
> weld-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
>
--
Gavin King
gavin.king@gmail.com
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
http://hibernate.org
http://seamframework.org
Fw: [weld-dev] Using Interceptor/Decorator On Dependent Scoped Beans
Posted by Gurkan Erdogdu <gu...@yahoo.com>.
----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Marius Bogoevici <ma...@redhat.com>
To: Dan Allen <da...@gmail.com>
Cc: Gurkan Erdogdu <gu...@yahoo.com>; openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org; weld-dev@lists.jboss.org
Sent: Tue, October 27, 2009 8:50:39 PM
Subject: Re: [weld-dev] Using Interceptor/Decorator On Dependent Scoped Beans
In Weld, we do apply decorators and interceptors on all managed beans, including the ones which are @Dependent.
Marius
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 14:03 -0400, Dan Allen wrote:
> According to the intro in Chapter 8. Decorators:
>
>> "Decorators may be associated with any managed bean that is not itself an interceptor or decorator or with any EJB session bean."
>
>> Dependent-scoped beans are managed beans, so ergo, they must allow decorators.
>
>> I can't provide a use case off the top of my head (just not something my mind is currently chewing on).
>
>> -Dan
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu <gu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi;
>>
>>
>>>> Does the 299 specification indicate that interceptors and decorators should
>>>> not be called for dependent scoped beans?
>>
>>>> Currently we do not implement Interceptor/Decorator on @Dependent scoped beans in OWB because we do all interceptor/decorator stuff using proxy and @Dependent scoped beans do not require client proxy.
>>
>>>> Does anyone has a good use case/example when dependent scoped beans are useful or necessary?
>>
>>>> Thanks;
>>
>>>> --Gurkan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> weld-dev mailing list
>>weld-dev@lists.jboss.org
>>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
>
>
>> --
>> Dan Allen
>> Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
>> Registered Linux User #231597
>
>http://mojavelinux.com
>http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
>http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
>_______________________________________________
>weld-dev mailing list
>weld-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
Re: [weld-dev] Using Interceptor/Decorator On Dependent Scoped
Beans
Posted by Marius Bogoevici <ma...@redhat.com>.
In Weld, we do apply decorators and interceptors on all managed beans,
including the ones which are @Dependent.
Marius
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 14:03 -0400, Dan Allen wrote:
> According to the intro in Chapter 8. Decorators:
>
> "Decorators may be associated with any managed bean that is not itself
> an interceptor or decorator or with any EJB session bean."
>
> Dependent-scoped beans are managed beans, so ergo, they must allow
> decorators.
>
> I can't provide a use case off the top of my head (just not something
> my mind is currently chewing on).
>
> -Dan
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu
> <gu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Hi;
>
>
> Does the 299 specification indicate that interceptors and
> decorators should
> not be called for dependent scoped beans?
>
> Currently we do not implement Interceptor/Decorator on
> @Dependent scoped beans in OWB because we do all
> interceptor/decorator stuff using proxy and @Dependent scoped
> beans do not require client proxy.
>
> Does anyone has a good use case/example when dependent scoped
> beans are useful or necessary?
>
> Thanks;
>
> --Gurkan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> weld-dev mailing list
> weld-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
> Dan Allen
> Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
> Registered Linux User #231597
>
> http://mojavelinux.com
> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
> http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
>
> _______________________________________________
> weld-dev mailing list
> weld-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
Re: [weld-dev] Using Interceptor/Decorator On Dependent Scoped Beans
Posted by Dan Allen <da...@gmail.com>.
According to the intro in Chapter 8. Decorators:
"Decorators may be associated with any managed bean that is not itself an
interceptor or decorator or with any EJB session bean."
Dependent-scoped beans are managed beans, so ergo, they must allow
decorators.
I can't provide a use case off the top of my head (just not something my
mind is currently chewing on).
-Dan
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu <gu...@yahoo.com>wrote:
> Hi;
>
>
> Does the 299 specification indicate that interceptors and decorators should
> not be called for dependent scoped beans?
>
> Currently we do not implement Interceptor/Decorator on @Dependent scoped
> beans in OWB because we do all interceptor/decorator stuff using proxy and
> @Dependent scoped beans do not require client proxy.
>
> Does anyone has a good use case/example when dependent scoped beans are
> useful or necessary?
>
> Thanks;
>
> --Gurkan
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> weld-dev mailing list
> weld-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
>
--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
Re: Using Interceptor/Decorator On Dependent Scoped Beans
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
not sure if cross postings are really cool :-)
I do prefer a bookmarkable link and just pointing to it...
-M
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu
<gu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi;
>
>
> Does the 299 specification indicate that interceptors and decorators should
> not be called for dependent scoped beans?
>
> Currently we do not implement Interceptor/Decorator on @Dependent scoped beans in OWB because we do all interceptor/decorator stuff using proxy and @Dependent scoped beans do not require client proxy.
>
> Does anyone has a good use case/example when dependent scoped beans are useful or necessary?
>
> Thanks;
>
> --Gurkan
>
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf