You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@felix.apache.org by Ja...@mars-india.com on 2009/05/01 16:23:14 UTC
Compliances
Hi all,
I would like to if any one is working following OSGi spcifications to get
implemented on Felix.
1) Permission Admin Service Specification
2) Fragment Bundles
3) BootClasspath Extension
Thanks
--Jagan.
Re: Compliances
Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
On 5/2/09 9:05 AM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
> On May 1, 2009, at 19:54 , Richard S. Hall wrote:
>
>>>> 3) BootClasspath Extension
>
>> for (3) it doesn't
>> look so good. Boot class path extension are very low priority for me.
>> The implementation would be JVM specific and it would require that we
>> actually have a separate launching to launch Felix in a separate process
>> and monitor it. I just don't see that happening any time soon.
>
>
> It would not be too difficult for somebody else to provide a
> launcher/wrapper that does this. Maybe that's a path towards being
> able to update the framework too.
Yes, it could be used for that too. I agree, but I am still doubtful it
is something I will implement.
-> richard
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
Re: Compliances
Posted by Marcel Offermans <ma...@luminis.nl>.
On May 1, 2009, at 19:54 , Richard S. Hall wrote:
>>> 3) BootClasspath Extension
> for (3) it doesn't
> look so good. Boot class path extension are very low priority for me.
> The implementation would be JVM specific and it would require that we
> actually have a separate launching to launch Felix in a separate
> process
> and monitor it. I just don't see that happening any time soon.
It would not be too difficult for somebody else to provide a launcher/
wrapper that does this. Maybe that's a path towards being able to
update the framework too.
Greetings, Marcel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
Re: Compliances
Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
In addition to that, I will likely commit an initial pass at improved
fragment support later today.
That gets you on your way for (1) and (2), however for (3) it doesn't
look so good. Boot class path extension are very low priority for me.
The implementation would be JVM specific and it would require that we
actually have a separate launching to launch Felix in a separate process
and monitor it. I just don't see that happening any time soon.
-> richard
On 5/1/09 11:49 AM, Ulf Dittmer wrote:
> It so happens that I'm currently looking at
> (Conditional)PermissionAdmin. Although there's no released version of
> the service, the source trunk contains an implementation. I've just
> posted a patch that allows those sources to be used with the current
> Felix trunk; see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1101
>
> Ulf
>
>
> On 01.05.2009, at 16:23, Jagan.Pappula@mars-india.com wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I would like to if any one is working following OSGi spcifications to
>> get
>> implemented on Felix.
>>
>> 1) Permission Admin Service Specification
>> 2) Fragment Bundles
>> 3) BootClasspath Extension
>>
>> Thanks
>> --Jagan.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
Re: Compliances
Posted by Ulf Dittmer <ul...@ulfdittmer.com>.
It so happens that I'm currently looking at (Conditional)
PermissionAdmin. Although there's no released version of the service,
the source trunk contains an implementation. I've just posted a patch
that allows those sources to be used with the current Felix trunk;
see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1101
Ulf
On 01.05.2009, at 16:23, Jagan.Pappula@mars-india.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to if any one is working following OSGi spcifications
> to get
> implemented on Felix.
>
> 1) Permission Admin Service Specification
> 2) Fragment Bundles
> 3) BootClasspath Extension
>
> Thanks
> --Jagan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org