You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openoffice.apache.org by Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org> on 2013/06/06 19:11:53 UTC
[VOTE][RESULTS] Logo selection for Apache OpenOffice 4.0
Here are the binding votes, with names abbreviated as:
CR = Chris Rottensteiner
KGa = Kevin Grignon A
KGb = Kevin Grignon AB
SM = Samer Monsour
none = none of the above
PMC 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th
robweir CR KGa KGb SM
regina none CR Logo-39 Logo-28
rgb-es none SM CR KGa KGb
arist SM CR KGa none
kschenk Logo-28 Logo-31 KGb CR none
pescetti CR SM none KGa KGb
hdu KGa KGb Logo-11 SM CR
khirano none KGa CR SM KGb
mayongl none CR KGa
alg none CR SM KGb KGa
orw CR SM none
jsc CR none SM KGa
af CR SM KGa none
arielch none
pj CR Logo-04
We have 15 ballots, so 8 votes are required to win.
With Instant Runoff Voting we proceed in multiple rounds. In each
round we tally the votes, see if anyone logo has the majority. If
none do, then we drop the lowest scoring logo and reallocate the votes
for those who picked the lowest scoring logo to their next ordered
preference. Ties are broken by "looking forward" to next level
preferences.
Round 1
------------
CR: 6 votes
none: 6 votes
SM: 1 vote
Logo-28: 1 vote
There is a tie for last place (SM and Logo-28) so we look forward to
2nd place preferences as a tiebreaker and see that SM has 4 votes and
Logo-28 has zero. So we drop Logo-28 and move to Kay's 2nd preference
(Logo-31) for Round 2.
Round 2
------------
CR: 6 votes
none: 6 votes
SM: 1 vote
Logo-31: 1 vote
Again, no logo has a majority, so we drop the lowest scoring logo.
Again, a tie, so we look forward at next preferences where SM has 4
votes and Logo-31 has zero. So we drop Logo-31 and move to Kay's next
preference (KGb) for Round 3.
Round 3
------------
CR: 6 votes
none: 6 votes
SM: 1 vote
KGb: 1 vote
Again, no logo has a majority, so we drop the lowest scoring logo.
Again, a tie, so we look forward at next preference where SM has 4
votes and KGb has 1. So we drop KGb and move to Kay's next preference
(CR) for Round 4.
Round 4
------------
CR: 7 votes
none: 6 votes
SM: 1 vote
Again, no logo has a majority, so we drop the lowest scoring logo, SM,
and reallocate Andrew's vote to his next choice, CR for round 5.
Round 5
------------
CR: 8 votes
none: 6 votes
CR now has the majority and wins. Note this is intuitively obvious as
well, since 75% of the ballots rated CR higher than none.
Regards,
-Rob
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Logo selection for Apache OpenOffice 4.0
Posted by Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org>.
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Guenter Marxen
<gu...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Am 08.06.2013 00:39, schrieb Rob Weir:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Guenter Marxen
>> <gu...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Rob,
>>>
>>> you invited all to vote (although only pmc member votes are binding).
>>>
>>> You did not report the non-pmc-votes. Are they not worth to be reported
>>> or
>>> was there a complete other (perhaps unwanted) result?
>>>
>>
>> I did not tally those votes since they were non-binding. However,
>
>
> But they couldt have given good hints for an further improvement of the
> logo. (That could be achieved in very short time (72 hours).)
>
The ballots contained very, very few comments. And remember we
already had a survey of 5000 users where we received many hundreds of
comments. I'm not saying that there is nothing new to be learned, but
that it is unlikely to have occurred in 5 or 6 non-binding ballots as
compared to, say, recent discussions on the mailing list regarding
these logos.
>
>> all votes were echoed to the mailing list and are available in the
>> archives, if anyone wants to analyze them further.
>
>
> So to say, we (as users, normal or power users) can spare every effort
> (votes, BZ reports etc.) because they are not (you say) "binding", but
> definetely it means not "worth to consider".
>
"Not worth to consider" are your words, not mine. If analysis of the
non-binding votes is interesting to you personally, then please do so,
and post whatever you find. Nothing is stopping you. But arguing
about my priorities is certainly a pointless activity for you to
engage in.
> It's the same as in case with the votes in BZ. In your mail of 2013-03-20
> (ID <CA...@mail.gmail.com>)
> you wrote
>
> "... So my approach will be to not use Bugzilla issues at all."
>
> Why shoudt we, users (and supporters) of AOO, do any tests and BZ reports if
> they are not used "at all"?
>
> Perhaps a not so "efficient" technocratic view like yours would be better
> for the product in such cases, although in many (or most) other aspects it's
> adequate.
>
IMHO you are merely being argumentative. I'm not inclined to discuss
this topic further with you.
Enjoy your weekend.
-Rob
>
> Günter Marxen
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Logo selection for Apache OpenOffice 4.0
Posted by Guenter Marxen <gu...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Andrea,
thank you for your reply. Perhaps sometimes or always my mails look
"argumentative", my concern is not.
If you invite to participate and then "use it not at all", that is not
motivating for engaged users. But this thread is past. (The next thread
will come ;-).
Am 11.06.2013 22:11, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> ...
> All indications from the 5000+ survey participants were given to the
> designers. Designers converged towards a common design and, if you see
> the final pool where we picked the final one from, you'll notice that
> they became all very similar to each other, and the final round picked
> the adapted version of the most voted logo in the survey. So the
> community at large was decisive the logo selection.
That's true and accepted. All "last" logos resembled the old one with
little differences. Therefore a synthesis of all could have been again a
little bit better. (Sure it would have taken more time.)
F.e. for me the gulls of Kevin are more "dynamic", fonts etc. of the old
logo more harmonic.
But this case is finished.
>> Why shoudt we, users (and supporters) of AOO, do any tests and BZ
>> reports if they are not used "at all"?
>
> Because all contributions are welcome and we surely don't look too much
See 2. para at the top.
> at who reported a bug, we look at the bug. Let's take the Sidebar for
> example. As you can see in
> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121420 the Sidebar had 121
> bugs reported so far, coming from regular contributors but also from the
> public at large, and all have been taken seriously (97% of them have
> already been fixed).
As I wrote in other mails, I absolutely accept priorities.
>> Perhaps a not so "efficient" technocratic view like yours would be
>> better for the product in such cases, although in many (or most) other
>> aspects it's adequate.
>
> The project in general does not have a "technocratic" view. But we are
> still in a situation where unless one regularly reads this list (and
> traffic here is likely too much for someone who only wants to get some
> basic updates) it is difficult to stay informed. We have margin for
I read not all mails but most of the mails in "important" (for me) threads.
> improvement in internal communication. Maybe we would need something
> like an "OpenOffice Weekly News", a summary periodically posted to the
> list by someone, so that all contributors can read it to be sure that
> they aren't missing anything important...
Perhaps this would increase the information wave and be
contraproductive. On the other side structured information about this
would be an advantage for the projekt but time consuming work.
So for now let us argument a (not too) little bit.
--
Grüße
Günter Marxen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Logo selection for Apache OpenOffice 4.0
Posted by Andrea Pescetti <pe...@apache.org>.
On 08/06/2013 Guenter Marxen wrote:
> Am 08.06.2013 00:39, schrieb Rob Weir:
>> I did not tally those votes since they were non-binding. However,
> But they couldt have given good hints for an further improvement
All indications from the 5000+ survey participants were given to the
designers. Designers converged towards a common design and, if you see
the final pool where we picked the final one from, you'll notice that
they became all very similar to each other, and the final round picked
the adapted version of the most voted logo in the survey. So the
community at large was decisive the logo selection.
> Why shoudt we, users (and supporters) of AOO, do any tests and BZ
> reports if they are not used "at all"?
Because all contributions are welcome and we surely don't look too much
at who reported a bug, we look at the bug. Let's take the Sidebar for
example. As you can see in
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121420 the Sidebar had 121
bugs reported so far, coming from regular contributors but also from the
public at large, and all have been taken seriously (97% of them have
already been fixed).
> Perhaps a not so "efficient" technocratic view like yours would be
> better for the product in such cases, although in many (or most) other
> aspects it's adequate.
The project in general does not have a "technocratic" view. But we are
still in a situation where unless one regularly reads this list (and
traffic here is likely too much for someone who only wants to get some
basic updates) it is difficult to stay informed. We have margin for
improvement in internal communication. Maybe we would need something
like an "OpenOffice Weekly News", a summary periodically posted to the
list by someone, so that all contributors can read it to be sure that
they aren't missing anything important...
Regards,
Andrea.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Logo selection for Apache OpenOffice 4.0
Posted by Guenter Marxen <gu...@googlemail.com>.
Am 08.06.2013 00:39, schrieb Rob Weir:
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Guenter Marxen
> <gu...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> you invited all to vote (although only pmc member votes are binding).
>>
>> You did not report the non-pmc-votes. Are they not worth to be reported or
>> was there a complete other (perhaps unwanted) result?
>>
>
> I did not tally those votes since they were non-binding. However,
But they couldt have given good hints for an further improvement of the
logo. (That could be achieved in very short time (72 hours).)
> all votes were echoed to the mailing list and are available in the
> archives, if anyone wants to analyze them further.
So to say, we (as users, normal or power users) can spare every effort
(votes, BZ reports etc.) because they are not (you say) "binding", but
definetely it means not "worth to consider".
It's the same as in case with the votes in BZ. In your mail of
2013-03-20 (ID
<CA...@mail.gmail.com>)
you wrote
"... So my approach will be to not use Bugzilla issues at all."
Why shoudt we, users (and supporters) of AOO, do any tests and BZ
reports if they are not used "at all"?
Perhaps a not so "efficient" technocratic view like yours would be
better for the product in such cases, although in many (or most) other
aspects it's adequate.
Günter Marxen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Logo selection for Apache OpenOffice 4.0
Posted by Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org>.
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Guenter Marxen
<gu...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> you invited all to vote (although only pmc member votes are binding).
>
> You did not report the non-pmc-votes. Are they not worth to be reported or
> was there a complete other (perhaps unwanted) result?
>
I did not tally those votes since they were non-binding. However,
all votes were echoed to the mailing list and are available in the
archives, if anyone wants to analyze them further.
Regards,
-Rob
> Günter Marxen
>
> Am 06.06.2013 19:11, schrieb Rob Weir:
>>
>> Here are the binding votes, with names abbreviated as:
>>
>> CR = Chris Rottensteiner
>> KGa = Kevin Grignon A
>> KGb = Kevin Grignon AB
>> SM = Samer Monsour
>> none = none of the above
>>
>>
>> PMC 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th
>> robweir CR KGa KGb SM
>> regina none CR Logo-39 Logo-28
>> rgb-es none SM CR KGa KGb
>> arist SM CR KGa none
>> kschenk Logo-28 Logo-31 KGb CR none
>> pescetti CR SM none KGa KGb
>> hdu KGa KGb Logo-11 SM CR
>> khirano none KGa CR SM KGb
>> mayongl none CR KGa
>> alg none CR SM KGb KGa
>> orw CR SM none
>> jsc CR none SM KGa
>> af CR SM KGa none
>> arielch none
>> pj CR Logo-04
>>
>> We have 15 ballots, so 8 votes are required to win.
>>
>> With Instant Runoff Voting we proceed in multiple rounds. In each
>> round we tally the votes, see if anyone logo has the majority. If
>> none do, then we drop the lowest scoring logo and reallocate the votes
>> for those who picked the lowest scoring logo to their next ordered
>> preference. Ties are broken by "looking forward" to next level
>> preferences.
>>
>> Round 1
>> ------------
>>
>> CR: 6 votes
>> none: 6 votes
>> SM: 1 vote
>> Logo-28: 1 vote
>>
>> There is a tie for last place (SM and Logo-28) so we look forward to
>> 2nd place preferences as a tiebreaker and see that SM has 4 votes and
>> Logo-28 has zero. So we drop Logo-28 and move to Kay's 2nd preference
>> (Logo-31) for Round 2.
>>
>> Round 2
>> ------------
>>
>> CR: 6 votes
>> none: 6 votes
>> SM: 1 vote
>> Logo-31: 1 vote
>>
>> Again, no logo has a majority, so we drop the lowest scoring logo.
>> Again, a tie, so we look forward at next preferences where SM has 4
>> votes and Logo-31 has zero. So we drop Logo-31 and move to Kay's next
>> preference (KGb) for Round 3.
>>
>> Round 3
>> ------------
>>
>> CR: 6 votes
>> none: 6 votes
>> SM: 1 vote
>> KGb: 1 vote
>>
>> Again, no logo has a majority, so we drop the lowest scoring logo.
>> Again, a tie, so we look forward at next preference where SM has 4
>> votes and KGb has 1. So we drop KGb and move to Kay's next preference
>> (CR) for Round 4.
>>
>> Round 4
>> ------------
>>
>> CR: 7 votes
>> none: 6 votes
>> SM: 1 vote
>>
>> Again, no logo has a majority, so we drop the lowest scoring logo, SM,
>> and reallocate Andrew's vote to his next choice, CR for round 5.
>>
>> Round 5
>> ------------
>>
>> CR: 8 votes
>> none: 6 votes
>>
>> CR now has the majority and wins. Note this is intuitively obvious as
>> well, since 75% of the ballots rated CR higher than none.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> -Rob
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>
> --
> Grüße
>
> Günter Marxen
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Logo selection for Apache OpenOffice 4.0
Posted by Guenter Marxen <gu...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Rob,
you invited all to vote (although only pmc member votes are binding).
You did not report the non-pmc-votes. Are they not worth to be reported
or was there a complete other (perhaps unwanted) result?
Günter Marxen
Am 06.06.2013 19:11, schrieb Rob Weir:
> Here are the binding votes, with names abbreviated as:
>
> CR = Chris Rottensteiner
> KGa = Kevin Grignon A
> KGb = Kevin Grignon AB
> SM = Samer Monsour
> none = none of the above
>
>
> PMC 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th
> robweir CR KGa KGb SM
> regina none CR Logo-39 Logo-28
> rgb-es none SM CR KGa KGb
> arist SM CR KGa none
> kschenk Logo-28 Logo-31 KGb CR none
> pescetti CR SM none KGa KGb
> hdu KGa KGb Logo-11 SM CR
> khirano none KGa CR SM KGb
> mayongl none CR KGa
> alg none CR SM KGb KGa
> orw CR SM none
> jsc CR none SM KGa
> af CR SM KGa none
> arielch none
> pj CR Logo-04
>
> We have 15 ballots, so 8 votes are required to win.
>
> With Instant Runoff Voting we proceed in multiple rounds. In each
> round we tally the votes, see if anyone logo has the majority. If
> none do, then we drop the lowest scoring logo and reallocate the votes
> for those who picked the lowest scoring logo to their next ordered
> preference. Ties are broken by "looking forward" to next level
> preferences.
>
> Round 1
> ------------
>
> CR: 6 votes
> none: 6 votes
> SM: 1 vote
> Logo-28: 1 vote
>
> There is a tie for last place (SM and Logo-28) so we look forward to
> 2nd place preferences as a tiebreaker and see that SM has 4 votes and
> Logo-28 has zero. So we drop Logo-28 and move to Kay's 2nd preference
> (Logo-31) for Round 2.
>
> Round 2
> ------------
>
> CR: 6 votes
> none: 6 votes
> SM: 1 vote
> Logo-31: 1 vote
>
> Again, no logo has a majority, so we drop the lowest scoring logo.
> Again, a tie, so we look forward at next preferences where SM has 4
> votes and Logo-31 has zero. So we drop Logo-31 and move to Kay's next
> preference (KGb) for Round 3.
>
> Round 3
> ------------
>
> CR: 6 votes
> none: 6 votes
> SM: 1 vote
> KGb: 1 vote
>
> Again, no logo has a majority, so we drop the lowest scoring logo.
> Again, a tie, so we look forward at next preference where SM has 4
> votes and KGb has 1. So we drop KGb and move to Kay's next preference
> (CR) for Round 4.
>
> Round 4
> ------------
>
> CR: 7 votes
> none: 6 votes
> SM: 1 vote
>
> Again, no logo has a majority, so we drop the lowest scoring logo, SM,
> and reallocate Andrew's vote to his next choice, CR for round 5.
>
> Round 5
> ------------
>
> CR: 8 votes
> none: 6 votes
>
> CR now has the majority and wins. Note this is intuitively obvious as
> well, since 75% of the ballots rated CR higher than none.
>
> Regards,
>
> -Rob
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
--
Grüße
Günter Marxen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Logo selection for Apache OpenOffice 4.0
Posted by Chris Rot <ch...@gmail.com>.
Glas to help the project and give something back. ;-)
2013/6/7 Chris Rot <ch...@gmail.com>
> Have just send the files to Rob.
>
>
> 2013/6/6 Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org>
>
>> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Alexandro Colorado <jz...@oooes.org> wrote:
>> > Do we have SVG on all of these logos yet or would they be required
>> > after the decision is made?
>> >
>>
>> I sent a request to Chris for his latest SVG. I'll post it once I
>> receive it.
>>
>> -Rob
>>
>> > On 6/6/13, Alphonso Whitfield III <aw...@vital-inet.com> wrote:
>> >> I have been traveling and was unable to participate please send a link
>> to
>> >> the winning logo. Thanks
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Plan Your Work and Work Your Plan
>> >> with The Vital Portal
>> >>
>> >> Alphonso Whitfield
>> >> info@thevitalportal.com
>> >> Vital
>> >> 912-816-2595
>> >> Skype: vital.i.net
>> >>
>> >> Visit us at:
>> >> The Vital Portal
>> >>
>> >> The Vital Portal On facebook
>> >>
>> >> Visit our Google Community
>> >>
>> >> Join our Vital Portal Webinars at:
>> >> The Vital Portal WebEx Meeting Center .
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ----- Original Message -----
>> >>
>> >> From: "Rob Weir" <ro...@apache.org>
>> >> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org, marketing@openoffice.apache.org
>> >> Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2013 1:11:53 PM
>> >> Subject: [VOTE][RESULTS] Logo selection for Apache OpenOffice 4.0
>> >>
>> >> Here are the binding votes, with names abbreviated as:
>> >>
>> >> CR = Chris Rottensteiner
>> >> KGa = Kevin Grignon A
>> >> KGb = Kevin Grignon AB
>> >> SM = Samer Monsour
>> >> none = none of the above
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> PMC 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th
>> >> robweir CR KGa KGb SM
>> >> regina none CR Logo-39 Logo-28
>> >> rgb-es none SM CR KGa KGb
>> >> arist SM CR KGa none
>> >> kschenk Logo-28 Logo-31 KGb CR none
>> >> pescetti CR SM none KGa KGb
>> >> hdu KGa KGb Logo-11 SM CR
>> >> khirano none KGa CR SM KGb
>> >> mayongl none CR KGa
>> >> alg none CR SM KGb KGa
>> >> orw CR SM none
>> >> jsc CR none SM KGa
>> >> af CR SM KGa none
>> >> arielch none
>> >> pj CR Logo-04
>> >>
>> >> We have 15 ballots, so 8 votes are required to win.
>> >>
>> >> With Instant Runoff Voting we proceed in multiple rounds. In each
>> >> round we tally the votes, see if anyone logo has the majority. If
>> >> none do, then we drop the lowest scoring logo and reallocate the votes
>> >> for those who picked the lowest scoring logo to their next ordered
>> >> preference. Ties are broken by "looking forward" to next level
>> >> preferences.
>> >>
>> >> Round 1
>> >> ------------
>> >>
>> >> CR: 6 votes
>> >> none: 6 votes
>> >> SM: 1 vote
>> >> Logo-28: 1 vote
>> >>
>> >> There is a tie for last place (SM and Logo-28) so we look forward to
>> >> 2nd place preferences as a tiebreaker and see that SM has 4 votes and
>> >> Logo-28 has zero. So we drop Logo-28 and move to Kay's 2nd preference
>> >> (Logo-31) for Round 2.
>> >>
>> >> Round 2
>> >> ------------
>> >>
>> >> CR: 6 votes
>> >> none: 6 votes
>> >> SM: 1 vote
>> >> Logo-31: 1 vote
>> >>
>> >> Again, no logo has a majority, so we drop the lowest scoring logo.
>> >> Again, a tie, so we look forward at next preferences where SM has 4
>> >> votes and Logo-31 has zero. So we drop Logo-31 and move to Kay's next
>> >> preference (KGb) for Round 3.
>> >>
>> >> Round 3
>> >> ------------
>> >>
>> >> CR: 6 votes
>> >> none: 6 votes
>> >> SM: 1 vote
>> >> KGb: 1 vote
>> >>
>> >> Again, no logo has a majority, so we drop the lowest scoring logo.
>> >> Again, a tie, so we look forward at next preference where SM has 4
>> >> votes and KGb has 1. So we drop KGb and move to Kay's next preference
>> >> (CR) for Round 4.
>> >>
>> >> Round 4
>> >> ------------
>> >>
>> >> CR: 7 votes
>> >> none: 6 votes
>> >> SM: 1 vote
>> >>
>> >> Again, no logo has a majority, so we drop the lowest scoring logo, SM,
>> >> and reallocate Andrew's vote to his next choice, CR for round 5.
>> >>
>> >> Round 5
>> >> ------------
>> >>
>> >> CR: 8 votes
>> >> none: 6 votes
>> >>
>> >> CR now has the majority and wins. Note this is intuitively obvious as
>> >> well, since 75% of the ballots rated CR higher than none.
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >>
>> >> -Rob
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: marketing-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: marketing-help@openoffice.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Alexandro Colorado
>> > Apache OpenOffice Contributor
>> > http://es.openoffice.org
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: marketing-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: marketing-help@openoffice.apache.org
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: marketing-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: marketing-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Logo selection for Apache OpenOffice 4.0
Posted by Chris Rot <ch...@gmail.com>.
Have just send the files to Rob.
2013/6/6 Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org>
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Alexandro Colorado <jz...@oooes.org> wrote:
> > Do we have SVG on all of these logos yet or would they be required
> > after the decision is made?
> >
>
> I sent a request to Chris for his latest SVG. I'll post it once I receive
> it.
>
> -Rob
>
> > On 6/6/13, Alphonso Whitfield III <aw...@vital-inet.com> wrote:
> >> I have been traveling and was unable to participate please send a link
> to
> >> the winning logo. Thanks
> >>
> >>
> >> Plan Your Work and Work Your Plan
> >> with The Vital Portal
> >>
> >> Alphonso Whitfield
> >> info@thevitalportal.com
> >> Vital
> >> 912-816-2595
> >> Skype: vital.i.net
> >>
> >> Visit us at:
> >> The Vital Portal
> >>
> >> The Vital Portal On facebook
> >>
> >> Visit our Google Community
> >>
> >> Join our Vital Portal Webinars at:
> >> The Vital Portal WebEx Meeting Center .
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >>
> >> From: "Rob Weir" <ro...@apache.org>
> >> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org, marketing@openoffice.apache.org
> >> Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2013 1:11:53 PM
> >> Subject: [VOTE][RESULTS] Logo selection for Apache OpenOffice 4.0
> >>
> >> Here are the binding votes, with names abbreviated as:
> >>
> >> CR = Chris Rottensteiner
> >> KGa = Kevin Grignon A
> >> KGb = Kevin Grignon AB
> >> SM = Samer Monsour
> >> none = none of the above
> >>
> >>
> >> PMC 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th
> >> robweir CR KGa KGb SM
> >> regina none CR Logo-39 Logo-28
> >> rgb-es none SM CR KGa KGb
> >> arist SM CR KGa none
> >> kschenk Logo-28 Logo-31 KGb CR none
> >> pescetti CR SM none KGa KGb
> >> hdu KGa KGb Logo-11 SM CR
> >> khirano none KGa CR SM KGb
> >> mayongl none CR KGa
> >> alg none CR SM KGb KGa
> >> orw CR SM none
> >> jsc CR none SM KGa
> >> af CR SM KGa none
> >> arielch none
> >> pj CR Logo-04
> >>
> >> We have 15 ballots, so 8 votes are required to win.
> >>
> >> With Instant Runoff Voting we proceed in multiple rounds. In each
> >> round we tally the votes, see if anyone logo has the majority. If
> >> none do, then we drop the lowest scoring logo and reallocate the votes
> >> for those who picked the lowest scoring logo to their next ordered
> >> preference. Ties are broken by "looking forward" to next level
> >> preferences.
> >>
> >> Round 1
> >> ------------
> >>
> >> CR: 6 votes
> >> none: 6 votes
> >> SM: 1 vote
> >> Logo-28: 1 vote
> >>
> >> There is a tie for last place (SM and Logo-28) so we look forward to
> >> 2nd place preferences as a tiebreaker and see that SM has 4 votes and
> >> Logo-28 has zero. So we drop Logo-28 and move to Kay's 2nd preference
> >> (Logo-31) for Round 2.
> >>
> >> Round 2
> >> ------------
> >>
> >> CR: 6 votes
> >> none: 6 votes
> >> SM: 1 vote
> >> Logo-31: 1 vote
> >>
> >> Again, no logo has a majority, so we drop the lowest scoring logo.
> >> Again, a tie, so we look forward at next preferences where SM has 4
> >> votes and Logo-31 has zero. So we drop Logo-31 and move to Kay's next
> >> preference (KGb) for Round 3.
> >>
> >> Round 3
> >> ------------
> >>
> >> CR: 6 votes
> >> none: 6 votes
> >> SM: 1 vote
> >> KGb: 1 vote
> >>
> >> Again, no logo has a majority, so we drop the lowest scoring logo.
> >> Again, a tie, so we look forward at next preference where SM has 4
> >> votes and KGb has 1. So we drop KGb and move to Kay's next preference
> >> (CR) for Round 4.
> >>
> >> Round 4
> >> ------------
> >>
> >> CR: 7 votes
> >> none: 6 votes
> >> SM: 1 vote
> >>
> >> Again, no logo has a majority, so we drop the lowest scoring logo, SM,
> >> and reallocate Andrew's vote to his next choice, CR for round 5.
> >>
> >> Round 5
> >> ------------
> >>
> >> CR: 8 votes
> >> none: 6 votes
> >>
> >> CR now has the majority and wins. Note this is intuitively obvious as
> >> well, since 75% of the ballots rated CR higher than none.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> -Rob
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: marketing-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: marketing-help@openoffice.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Alexandro Colorado
> > Apache OpenOffice Contributor
> > http://es.openoffice.org
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: marketing-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: marketing-help@openoffice.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: marketing-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: marketing-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Logo selection for Apache OpenOffice 4.0
Posted by Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Alexandro Colorado <jz...@oooes.org> wrote:
> Do we have SVG on all of these logos yet or would they be required
> after the decision is made?
>
I sent a request to Chris for his latest SVG. I'll post it once I receive it.
-Rob
> On 6/6/13, Alphonso Whitfield III <aw...@vital-inet.com> wrote:
>> I have been traveling and was unable to participate please send a link to
>> the winning logo. Thanks
>>
>>
>> Plan Your Work and Work Your Plan
>> with The Vital Portal
>>
>> Alphonso Whitfield
>> info@thevitalportal.com
>> Vital
>> 912-816-2595
>> Skype: vital.i.net
>>
>> Visit us at:
>> The Vital Portal
>>
>> The Vital Portal On facebook
>>
>> Visit our Google Community
>>
>> Join our Vital Portal Webinars at:
>> The Vital Portal WebEx Meeting Center .
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>
>> From: "Rob Weir" <ro...@apache.org>
>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org, marketing@openoffice.apache.org
>> Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2013 1:11:53 PM
>> Subject: [VOTE][RESULTS] Logo selection for Apache OpenOffice 4.0
>>
>> Here are the binding votes, with names abbreviated as:
>>
>> CR = Chris Rottensteiner
>> KGa = Kevin Grignon A
>> KGb = Kevin Grignon AB
>> SM = Samer Monsour
>> none = none of the above
>>
>>
>> PMC 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th
>> robweir CR KGa KGb SM
>> regina none CR Logo-39 Logo-28
>> rgb-es none SM CR KGa KGb
>> arist SM CR KGa none
>> kschenk Logo-28 Logo-31 KGb CR none
>> pescetti CR SM none KGa KGb
>> hdu KGa KGb Logo-11 SM CR
>> khirano none KGa CR SM KGb
>> mayongl none CR KGa
>> alg none CR SM KGb KGa
>> orw CR SM none
>> jsc CR none SM KGa
>> af CR SM KGa none
>> arielch none
>> pj CR Logo-04
>>
>> We have 15 ballots, so 8 votes are required to win.
>>
>> With Instant Runoff Voting we proceed in multiple rounds. In each
>> round we tally the votes, see if anyone logo has the majority. If
>> none do, then we drop the lowest scoring logo and reallocate the votes
>> for those who picked the lowest scoring logo to their next ordered
>> preference. Ties are broken by "looking forward" to next level
>> preferences.
>>
>> Round 1
>> ------------
>>
>> CR: 6 votes
>> none: 6 votes
>> SM: 1 vote
>> Logo-28: 1 vote
>>
>> There is a tie for last place (SM and Logo-28) so we look forward to
>> 2nd place preferences as a tiebreaker and see that SM has 4 votes and
>> Logo-28 has zero. So we drop Logo-28 and move to Kay's 2nd preference
>> (Logo-31) for Round 2.
>>
>> Round 2
>> ------------
>>
>> CR: 6 votes
>> none: 6 votes
>> SM: 1 vote
>> Logo-31: 1 vote
>>
>> Again, no logo has a majority, so we drop the lowest scoring logo.
>> Again, a tie, so we look forward at next preferences where SM has 4
>> votes and Logo-31 has zero. So we drop Logo-31 and move to Kay's next
>> preference (KGb) for Round 3.
>>
>> Round 3
>> ------------
>>
>> CR: 6 votes
>> none: 6 votes
>> SM: 1 vote
>> KGb: 1 vote
>>
>> Again, no logo has a majority, so we drop the lowest scoring logo.
>> Again, a tie, so we look forward at next preference where SM has 4
>> votes and KGb has 1. So we drop KGb and move to Kay's next preference
>> (CR) for Round 4.
>>
>> Round 4
>> ------------
>>
>> CR: 7 votes
>> none: 6 votes
>> SM: 1 vote
>>
>> Again, no logo has a majority, so we drop the lowest scoring logo, SM,
>> and reallocate Andrew's vote to his next choice, CR for round 5.
>>
>> Round 5
>> ------------
>>
>> CR: 8 votes
>> none: 6 votes
>>
>> CR now has the majority and wins. Note this is intuitively obvious as
>> well, since 75% of the ballots rated CR higher than none.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> -Rob
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: marketing-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: marketing-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Alexandro Colorado
> Apache OpenOffice Contributor
> http://es.openoffice.org
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: marketing-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: marketing-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: marketing-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: marketing-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Logo selection for Apache OpenOffice 4.0
Posted by Alexandro Colorado <jz...@oooes.org>.
Do we have SVG on all of these logos yet or would they be required
after the decision is made?
On 6/6/13, Alphonso Whitfield III <aw...@vital-inet.com> wrote:
> I have been traveling and was unable to participate please send a link to
> the winning logo. Thanks
>
>
> Plan Your Work and Work Your Plan
> with The Vital Portal
>
> Alphonso Whitfield
> info@thevitalportal.com
> Vital
> 912-816-2595
> Skype: vital.i.net
>
> Visit us at:
> The Vital Portal
>
> The Vital Portal On facebook
>
> Visit our Google Community
>
> Join our Vital Portal Webinars at:
> The Vital Portal WebEx Meeting Center .
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: "Rob Weir" <ro...@apache.org>
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org, marketing@openoffice.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2013 1:11:53 PM
> Subject: [VOTE][RESULTS] Logo selection for Apache OpenOffice 4.0
>
> Here are the binding votes, with names abbreviated as:
>
> CR = Chris Rottensteiner
> KGa = Kevin Grignon A
> KGb = Kevin Grignon AB
> SM = Samer Monsour
> none = none of the above
>
>
> PMC 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th
> robweir CR KGa KGb SM
> regina none CR Logo-39 Logo-28
> rgb-es none SM CR KGa KGb
> arist SM CR KGa none
> kschenk Logo-28 Logo-31 KGb CR none
> pescetti CR SM none KGa KGb
> hdu KGa KGb Logo-11 SM CR
> khirano none KGa CR SM KGb
> mayongl none CR KGa
> alg none CR SM KGb KGa
> orw CR SM none
> jsc CR none SM KGa
> af CR SM KGa none
> arielch none
> pj CR Logo-04
>
> We have 15 ballots, so 8 votes are required to win.
>
> With Instant Runoff Voting we proceed in multiple rounds. In each
> round we tally the votes, see if anyone logo has the majority. If
> none do, then we drop the lowest scoring logo and reallocate the votes
> for those who picked the lowest scoring logo to their next ordered
> preference. Ties are broken by "looking forward" to next level
> preferences.
>
> Round 1
> ------------
>
> CR: 6 votes
> none: 6 votes
> SM: 1 vote
> Logo-28: 1 vote
>
> There is a tie for last place (SM and Logo-28) so we look forward to
> 2nd place preferences as a tiebreaker and see that SM has 4 votes and
> Logo-28 has zero. So we drop Logo-28 and move to Kay's 2nd preference
> (Logo-31) for Round 2.
>
> Round 2
> ------------
>
> CR: 6 votes
> none: 6 votes
> SM: 1 vote
> Logo-31: 1 vote
>
> Again, no logo has a majority, so we drop the lowest scoring logo.
> Again, a tie, so we look forward at next preferences where SM has 4
> votes and Logo-31 has zero. So we drop Logo-31 and move to Kay's next
> preference (KGb) for Round 3.
>
> Round 3
> ------------
>
> CR: 6 votes
> none: 6 votes
> SM: 1 vote
> KGb: 1 vote
>
> Again, no logo has a majority, so we drop the lowest scoring logo.
> Again, a tie, so we look forward at next preference where SM has 4
> votes and KGb has 1. So we drop KGb and move to Kay's next preference
> (CR) for Round 4.
>
> Round 4
> ------------
>
> CR: 7 votes
> none: 6 votes
> SM: 1 vote
>
> Again, no logo has a majority, so we drop the lowest scoring logo, SM,
> and reallocate Andrew's vote to his next choice, CR for round 5.
>
> Round 5
> ------------
>
> CR: 8 votes
> none: 6 votes
>
> CR now has the majority and wins. Note this is intuitively obvious as
> well, since 75% of the ballots rated CR higher than none.
>
> Regards,
>
> -Rob
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: marketing-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: marketing-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
>
>
--
Alexandro Colorado
Apache OpenOffice Contributor
http://es.openoffice.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: marketing-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: marketing-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Logo selection for Apache OpenOffice 4.0
Posted by Alphonso Whitfield III <aw...@vital-inet.com>.
I have been traveling and was unable to participate please send a link to the winning logo. Thanks
Plan Your Work and Work Your Plan
with The Vital Portal
Alphonso Whitfield
info@thevitalportal.com
Vital
912-816-2595
Skype: vital.i.net
Visit us at:
The Vital Portal
The Vital Portal On facebook
Visit our Google Community
Join our Vital Portal Webinars at:
The Vital Portal WebEx Meeting Center .
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob Weir" <ro...@apache.org>
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org, marketing@openoffice.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2013 1:11:53 PM
Subject: [VOTE][RESULTS] Logo selection for Apache OpenOffice 4.0
Here are the binding votes, with names abbreviated as:
CR = Chris Rottensteiner
KGa = Kevin Grignon A
KGb = Kevin Grignon AB
SM = Samer Monsour
none = none of the above
PMC 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th
robweir CR KGa KGb SM
regina none CR Logo-39 Logo-28
rgb-es none SM CR KGa KGb
arist SM CR KGa none
kschenk Logo-28 Logo-31 KGb CR none
pescetti CR SM none KGa KGb
hdu KGa KGb Logo-11 SM CR
khirano none KGa CR SM KGb
mayongl none CR KGa
alg none CR SM KGb KGa
orw CR SM none
jsc CR none SM KGa
af CR SM KGa none
arielch none
pj CR Logo-04
We have 15 ballots, so 8 votes are required to win.
With Instant Runoff Voting we proceed in multiple rounds. In each
round we tally the votes, see if anyone logo has the majority. If
none do, then we drop the lowest scoring logo and reallocate the votes
for those who picked the lowest scoring logo to their next ordered
preference. Ties are broken by "looking forward" to next level
preferences.
Round 1
------------
CR: 6 votes
none: 6 votes
SM: 1 vote
Logo-28: 1 vote
There is a tie for last place (SM and Logo-28) so we look forward to
2nd place preferences as a tiebreaker and see that SM has 4 votes and
Logo-28 has zero. So we drop Logo-28 and move to Kay's 2nd preference
(Logo-31) for Round 2.
Round 2
------------
CR: 6 votes
none: 6 votes
SM: 1 vote
Logo-31: 1 vote
Again, no logo has a majority, so we drop the lowest scoring logo.
Again, a tie, so we look forward at next preferences where SM has 4
votes and Logo-31 has zero. So we drop Logo-31 and move to Kay's next
preference (KGb) for Round 3.
Round 3
------------
CR: 6 votes
none: 6 votes
SM: 1 vote
KGb: 1 vote
Again, no logo has a majority, so we drop the lowest scoring logo.
Again, a tie, so we look forward at next preference where SM has 4
votes and KGb has 1. So we drop KGb and move to Kay's next preference
(CR) for Round 4.
Round 4
------------
CR: 7 votes
none: 6 votes
SM: 1 vote
Again, no logo has a majority, so we drop the lowest scoring logo, SM,
and reallocate Andrew's vote to his next choice, CR for round 5.
Round 5
------------
CR: 8 votes
none: 6 votes
CR now has the majority and wins. Note this is intuitively obvious as
well, since 75% of the ballots rated CR higher than none.
Regards,
-Rob
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: marketing-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: marketing-help@openoffice.apache.org