You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Mario Ivankovits <ma...@ops.co.at> on 2006/09/08 11:06:27 UTC
naming of dojo components
Hi!
Today I saw a new component coming in called DojoDialog and I thought:
"Is it really required - or the best idea - to prefix the dojo
components with dojo?"
What if we change the technique used within an dojo component to
something else (say superWebFlex - just a synonym), sure, one solution
can be to copy the dojoDialog to superWebFlexDialog, but maybe what we
really want to have is one super-dialog component only, e.g.
dynamicDialog and whatever technique used, the tag name will stay the same.
For sure, stuff like dojoInitializer is an exception as this directly
pass the component values to the dojo library, so there is no unified API.
Just some thoughts ...
Ciao,
Mario
Re: naming of dojo components
Posted by Werner Punz <we...@gmx.at>.
Gerald Müllan schrieb:
>> > +1 on modal dialog
>
> Just had a quick look at the dojo examples page, the guys call it the
> same way.
>
> So, seems that we get an agreement.
>
> Let`s name the maybe-anytime-non-dojo component that way. :)
>
+1 from me too, the only component where a dojo prefix
probably is mandatory is the dojoInitializer
there is no way, that one will ever use non dojo instead
of dojo code.
I will fixup the naming on the split pane in this way as well.
Re: naming of dojo components
Posted by Gerald Müllan <bi...@gmail.com>.
> > +1 on modal dialog
Just had a quick look at the dojo examples page, the guys call it the same way.
So, seems that we get an agreement.
Let`s name the maybe-anytime-non-dojo component that way. :)
regards,
Gerald
On 9/8/06, Mario Ivankovits <ma...@ops.co.at> wrote:
> Hi!
> > +1 on modal dialog
> As I said, my dynamic was just a wild guess, if the dialog is meant to
> be modal, then I am +1 on modal too.
>
> Ciao,
> Mario
>
>
--
Gerald Müllan
Schelleingasse 2/11
1040 Vienna, Austria
0043 699 11772506
gerald.muellan@gmail.com
Re: naming of dojo components
Posted by Mario Ivankovits <ma...@ops.co.at>.
Hi!
> +1 on modal dialog
As I said, my dynamic was just a wild guess, if the dialog is meant to
be modal, then I am +1 on modal too.
Ciao,
Mario
Re: naming of dojo components
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
+1 on modal dialog
On 9/8/06, Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
> what about "modalDialog"?
>
> On 9/8/06, Gerald Müllan <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Mario,
> >
> > > You know, I dont wanted to point to a special person, just a general
> > > discussion. Sorry, that it was your committed component I used as sample ;-)
> >
> > No problem, my strong ego withstands it :)
> >
> > > If it sufficiently describes it, sure, though, it was just a wild guess
> > > from my side ;-)
> >
> > Let`s take "dynamicDialog", sounds good to me.
> >
> > > If there is "at the end of the day" still consent about the renaming, do
> > > you have time to rename them too? Or should we ask Werner ;-)
> >
> > No problem, i can do the job.
> >
> > Werner, what are your thoughts about renaming your stuff?
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Gerald
> >
> > On 9/8/06, Mario Ivankovits <ma...@ops.co.at> wrote:
> > > Hi Gerald!
> > > > I just accepted the stuff from Thomas.
> > > You know, I dont wanted to point to a special person, just a general
> > > discussion. Sorry, that it was your committed component I used as sample ;-)
> > >
> > > > So, let`s change the name to "dynamicDialog"?
> > > If it sufficiently describes it, sure, though, it was just a wild guess
> > > from my side ;-)
> > >
> > > There is also
> > > * dojoContentPane
> > > * dojoSplitPane
> > >
> > > I think this is where the prefix "dynamic" really fits well.
> > >
> > > * dynamicContentPane
> > > * dynamicSplitPane
> > >
> > > If there is "at the end of the day" still consent about the renaming, do
> > > you have time to rename them too? Or should we ask Werner ;-)
> > >
> > >
> > > Ciao,
> > > Mario
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Gerald Müllan
> > Schelleingasse 2/11
> > 1040 Vienna, Austria
> > 0043 699 11772506
> > gerald.muellan@gmail.com
> >
>
>
> --
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: naming of dojo components
Posted by Thomas Spiegl <th...@gmail.com>.
what about "modalDialog"?
On 9/8/06, Gerald Müllan <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Mario,
>
> > You know, I dont wanted to point to a special person, just a general
> > discussion. Sorry, that it was your committed component I used as sample ;-)
>
> No problem, my strong ego withstands it :)
>
> > If it sufficiently describes it, sure, though, it was just a wild guess
> > from my side ;-)
>
> Let`s take "dynamicDialog", sounds good to me.
>
> > If there is "at the end of the day" still consent about the renaming, do
> > you have time to rename them too? Or should we ask Werner ;-)
>
> No problem, i can do the job.
>
> Werner, what are your thoughts about renaming your stuff?
>
> regards,
>
> Gerald
>
> On 9/8/06, Mario Ivankovits <ma...@ops.co.at> wrote:
> > Hi Gerald!
> > > I just accepted the stuff from Thomas.
> > You know, I dont wanted to point to a special person, just a general
> > discussion. Sorry, that it was your committed component I used as sample ;-)
> >
> > > So, let`s change the name to "dynamicDialog"?
> > If it sufficiently describes it, sure, though, it was just a wild guess
> > from my side ;-)
> >
> > There is also
> > * dojoContentPane
> > * dojoSplitPane
> >
> > I think this is where the prefix "dynamic" really fits well.
> >
> > * dynamicContentPane
> > * dynamicSplitPane
> >
> > If there is "at the end of the day" still consent about the renaming, do
> > you have time to rename them too? Or should we ask Werner ;-)
> >
> >
> > Ciao,
> > Mario
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Gerald Müllan
> Schelleingasse 2/11
> 1040 Vienna, Austria
> 0043 699 11772506
> gerald.muellan@gmail.com
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: naming of dojo components
Posted by Gerald Müllan <bi...@gmail.com>.
Hi Mario,
> You know, I dont wanted to point to a special person, just a general
> discussion. Sorry, that it was your committed component I used as sample ;-)
No problem, my strong ego withstands it :)
> If it sufficiently describes it, sure, though, it was just a wild guess
> from my side ;-)
Let`s take "dynamicDialog", sounds good to me.
> If there is "at the end of the day" still consent about the renaming, do
> you have time to rename them too? Or should we ask Werner ;-)
No problem, i can do the job.
Werner, what are your thoughts about renaming your stuff?
regards,
Gerald
On 9/8/06, Mario Ivankovits <ma...@ops.co.at> wrote:
> Hi Gerald!
> > I just accepted the stuff from Thomas.
> You know, I dont wanted to point to a special person, just a general
> discussion. Sorry, that it was your committed component I used as sample ;-)
>
> > So, let`s change the name to "dynamicDialog"?
> If it sufficiently describes it, sure, though, it was just a wild guess
> from my side ;-)
>
> There is also
> * dojoContentPane
> * dojoSplitPane
>
> I think this is where the prefix "dynamic" really fits well.
>
> * dynamicContentPane
> * dynamicSplitPane
>
> If there is "at the end of the day" still consent about the renaming, do
> you have time to rename them too? Or should we ask Werner ;-)
>
>
> Ciao,
> Mario
>
>
--
Gerald Müllan
Schelleingasse 2/11
1040 Vienna, Austria
0043 699 11772506
gerald.muellan@gmail.com
Re: naming of dojo components
Posted by Mario Ivankovits <ma...@ops.co.at>.
Hi Gerald!
> I just accepted the stuff from Thomas.
You know, I dont wanted to point to a special person, just a general
discussion. Sorry, that it was your committed component I used as sample ;-)
> So, let`s change the name to "dynamicDialog"?
If it sufficiently describes it, sure, though, it was just a wild guess
from my side ;-)
There is also
* dojoContentPane
* dojoSplitPane
I think this is where the prefix "dynamic" really fits well.
* dynamicContentPane
* dynamicSplitPane
If there is "at the end of the day" still consent about the renaming, do
you have time to rename them too? Or should we ask Werner ;-)
Ciao,
Mario
Re: naming of dojo components
Posted by Gerald Müllan <bi...@gmail.com>.
Yes Mario, same to me. The naming should be changed. No special dojo
naming at all.
I just accepted the stuff from Thomas.
So, let`s change the name to "dynamicDialog"?
cheers,
Gerald
On 9/8/06, Mario Ivankovits <ma...@ops.co.at> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Today I saw a new component coming in called DojoDialog and I thought:
> "Is it really required - or the best idea - to prefix the dojo
> components with dojo?"
>
> What if we change the technique used within an dojo component to
> something else (say superWebFlex - just a synonym), sure, one solution
> can be to copy the dojoDialog to superWebFlexDialog, but maybe what we
> really want to have is one super-dialog component only, e.g.
> dynamicDialog and whatever technique used, the tag name will stay the same.
>
> For sure, stuff like dojoInitializer is an exception as this directly
> pass the component values to the dojo library, so there is no unified API.
>
> Just some thoughts ...
>
> Ciao,
> Mario
>
>
--
Gerald Müllan
Schelleingasse 2/11
1040 Vienna, Austria
0043 699 11772506
gerald.muellan@gmail.com
Re: naming of dojo components
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
yeah, you're absolutely right.
that should be changed!
regards,
Martin
On 9/8/06, Mario Ivankovits <ma...@ops.co.at> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Today I saw a new component coming in called DojoDialog and I thought:
> "Is it really required - or the best idea - to prefix the dojo
> components with dojo?"
>
> What if we change the technique used within an dojo component to
> something else (say superWebFlex - just a synonym), sure, one solution
> can be to copy the dojoDialog to superWebFlexDialog, but maybe what we
> really want to have is one super-dialog component only, e.g.
> dynamicDialog and whatever technique used, the tag name will stay the same.
>
> For sure, stuff like dojoInitializer is an exception as this directly
> pass the component values to the dojo library, so there is no unified API.
>
> Just some thoughts ...
>
> Ciao,
> Mario
>
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces