You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org by "Tao Jie (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/09/07 06:56:20 UTC
[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (YARN-5552) Add Builder methods for
common yarn API records
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Tao Jie updated YARN-5552:
--------------------------
Comment: was deleted
(was: Thank you for your comment,[~leftnoteasy]!
Storing local variables in builder here is to give a default value for fields and avoid potential NPE. It is better to set default value also in builder constructor like:
{quote}
private ResourceRequestBuilder() {
ResourceRequest request = Records.newRecord(ResourceRequest.class);
request.setResourceName(ResourceRequest.ANY);
request.setPriority(Priority.newInstance(0));
...
}
{quote})
> Add Builder methods for common yarn API records
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-5552
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5552
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Arun Suresh
> Assignee: Tao Jie
> Attachments: YARN-5552.000.patch, YARN-5552.001.patch, YARN-5552.002.patch, YARN-5552.003.patch
>
>
> Currently yarn API records such as ResourceRequest, AllocateRequest/Respone as well as AMRMClient.ContainerRequest have multiple constructors / newInstance methods. This makes it very difficult to add new fields to these records.
> It would probably be better if we had Builder classes for many of these records, which would make evolution of these records a bit easier.
> (suggested by [~kasha])
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org