You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by Ivan Junckes Filho <iv...@gmail.com> on 2019/02/22 17:07:16 UTC
Microprofile 1.2.0 + CXF 3.3.0
Hey guys I created a ticket and PR to add MP Rest client 1.2.0 impl to
TomEE. Can you please review and merge?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2472
https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/409
Re: Microprofile 1.2.0 + CXF 3.3.0
Posted by Daniel Cunha <da...@gmail.com>.
Nice!
Thanks James.
Em ter, 26 de fev de 2019 às 12:00, j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net>
escreveu:
> PR419 is added for what I described above
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
>
--
Daniel "soro" Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_
Re: Microprofile 1.2.0 + CXF 3.3.0
Posted by j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net>.
PR419 is added for what I described above
--
Sent from: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
Re: Microprofile 1.2.0 + CXF 3.3.0
Posted by Ivan Junckes Filho <iv...@gmail.com>.
Nice, thanks James!
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 8:59 AM Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org> wrote:
> Nice!
>
> Thank you for all information!
>
> Em ter, 26 de fev de 2019 às 08:30, j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net>
> escreveu:
>
> > Great news that the build succeeds, thanks! My thoughts were based on
> this
> > statement in the CXF 3.3.0 Migration page:
> >
> > "Major dependency changes: ... JAX-RS and JAXB APIs are now JakartaEE
> > dependencies. All other JakartaEE dependencies will follow with the next
> > major release. Old dependencies can still be used, but this requires
> > exclusions to avoid duplicate transitive dependencies (currently no
> > relocation is in place)."
> >
> > Updating CXF to 3.3.0 means JAXB dependencies are brought in as 2.3.2
> > Jakarta release and also JAX-RS.
> > This means TomEE now has both JAXB 2.3.0 (it's own direct dependency)
> and
> > JAXB 2.3.2 from CXF 3.3.0.
> >
> > Also, activation-1.1.jar (implementation) is removed from TomEE (it
> doesn't
> > add it's Jakarta replacement). I see some dependencies on this file
> within
> > TomEE and also software that runs on TomEE. If deciding to remove it
> from
> > TomEE, I'd ask that a major version's notice be given for people to have
> > time to add their own.
> >
> > As part of the move to Jakarta, need to keep an eye out for new jakarta
> > dependencies causing duplicate API classes across multiple JARs in javax,
> > jakarta and javaee-api (e.g. jakarta/javax.activation-api,
> > jakarta/javax.inject, jakarta/javax.ws.rs-api,
> > jakarta/javax.xml-soap-api).
> > CXF 3.3.0 has made the move for only 2 specs. More to follow.
> >
> > So I have a PR ready to update the JAXB 2.3.0 direct dependency to 2.3.2,
> > add the newer jakarta-activation.jar to maintain backwards compatibility
> > and
> > add numerous exclusions.
> >
> > I'll pull this CXF 3.3.0 PR on top of mine and add exclusions for the
> > additional APIs it brings too. Combined, these should help avoid an API
> > jar
> > bloated TomEE! :)
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sent from:
> > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
> >
>
>
> --
> Daniel "soro" Cunha
> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>
Re: Microprofile 1.2.0 + CXF 3.3.0
Posted by Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org>.
Nice!
Thank you for all information!
Em ter, 26 de fev de 2019 às 08:30, j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net>
escreveu:
> Great news that the build succeeds, thanks! My thoughts were based on this
> statement in the CXF 3.3.0 Migration page:
>
> "Major dependency changes: ... JAX-RS and JAXB APIs are now JakartaEE
> dependencies. All other JakartaEE dependencies will follow with the next
> major release. Old dependencies can still be used, but this requires
> exclusions to avoid duplicate transitive dependencies (currently no
> relocation is in place)."
>
> Updating CXF to 3.3.0 means JAXB dependencies are brought in as 2.3.2
> Jakarta release and also JAX-RS.
> This means TomEE now has both JAXB 2.3.0 (it's own direct dependency) and
> JAXB 2.3.2 from CXF 3.3.0.
>
> Also, activation-1.1.jar (implementation) is removed from TomEE (it doesn't
> add it's Jakarta replacement). I see some dependencies on this file within
> TomEE and also software that runs on TomEE. If deciding to remove it from
> TomEE, I'd ask that a major version's notice be given for people to have
> time to add their own.
>
> As part of the move to Jakarta, need to keep an eye out for new jakarta
> dependencies causing duplicate API classes across multiple JARs in javax,
> jakarta and javaee-api (e.g. jakarta/javax.activation-api,
> jakarta/javax.inject, jakarta/javax.ws.rs-api,
> jakarta/javax.xml-soap-api).
> CXF 3.3.0 has made the move for only 2 specs. More to follow.
>
> So I have a PR ready to update the JAXB 2.3.0 direct dependency to 2.3.2,
> add the newer jakarta-activation.jar to maintain backwards compatibility
> and
> add numerous exclusions.
>
> I'll pull this CXF 3.3.0 PR on top of mine and add exclusions for the
> additional APIs it brings too. Combined, these should help avoid an API
> jar
> bloated TomEE! :)
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
>
--
Daniel "soro" Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_
Re: Microprofile 1.2.0 + CXF 3.3.0
Posted by j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net>.
Great news that the build succeeds, thanks! My thoughts were based on this
statement in the CXF 3.3.0 Migration page:
"Major dependency changes: ... JAX-RS and JAXB APIs are now JakartaEE
dependencies. All other JakartaEE dependencies will follow with the next
major release. Old dependencies can still be used, but this requires
exclusions to avoid duplicate transitive dependencies (currently no
relocation is in place)."
Updating CXF to 3.3.0 means JAXB dependencies are brought in as 2.3.2
Jakarta release and also JAX-RS.
This means TomEE now has both JAXB 2.3.0 (it's own direct dependency) and
JAXB 2.3.2 from CXF 3.3.0.
Also, activation-1.1.jar (implementation) is removed from TomEE (it doesn't
add it's Jakarta replacement). I see some dependencies on this file within
TomEE and also software that runs on TomEE. If deciding to remove it from
TomEE, I'd ask that a major version's notice be given for people to have
time to add their own.
As part of the move to Jakarta, need to keep an eye out for new jakarta
dependencies causing duplicate API classes across multiple JARs in javax,
jakarta and javaee-api (e.g. jakarta/javax.activation-api,
jakarta/javax.inject, jakarta/javax.ws.rs-api, jakarta/javax.xml-soap-api).
CXF 3.3.0 has made the move for only 2 specs. More to follow.
So I have a PR ready to update the JAXB 2.3.0 direct dependency to 2.3.2,
add the newer jakarta-activation.jar to maintain backwards compatibility and
add numerous exclusions.
I'll pull this CXF 3.3.0 PR on top of mine and add exclusions for the
additional APIs it brings too. Combined, these should help avoid an API jar
bloated TomEE! :)
--
Sent from: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
Re: Microprofile 1.2.0 + CXF 3.3.0
Posted by Ivan Junckes Filho <iv...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Dani, would be amazing if this PR makes it to the M3. I really need
a new feature from MP 1.2.0 that is in CXF 3.3.0 :)
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 10:11 PM Daniel Cunha <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> seems that the conflict just cause in a example.
> polling-client sample. That because we had a different version declared in
> the project's pom.xml.
>
> Green BUILD and PR updated and good to go.
>
> Btw, can you explain more your thought James?
> I really didn't get why JAXB is related with that change?
>
>
> Em seg, 25 de fev de 2019 às 09:49, j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net>
> escreveu:
>
> > Also, I notice on the exception above it's coming from openejb code
> here...
> >
> > with the comment "// TODO: drop when we get a fully supporting java 9
> > version of CXF"
> >
> > As CXF 3.3.0 supports Java 11, this implies this the call should be
> removed
> > completely and should resolve the above exception.
> >
> > private static void initAuthenticators() { // TODO: drop when we get
> a
> > fully supporting java 9 version of CXF
> > try {
> > CXFAuthenticator.addAuthenticator();
> > } catch (final RuntimeException re) {
> > // we swallow it while cxf doesnt support java 9, this
> > workaround is enough to make most of cases passing
> > }
> > }
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sent from:
> > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
> >
>
>
> --
> Daniel "soro" Cunha
> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>
Re: Microprofile 1.2.0 + CXF 3.3.0
Posted by Daniel Cunha <da...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
seems that the conflict just cause in a example.
polling-client sample. That because we had a different version declared in
the project's pom.xml.
Green BUILD and PR updated and good to go.
Btw, can you explain more your thought James?
I really didn't get why JAXB is related with that change?
Em seg, 25 de fev de 2019 às 09:49, j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net>
escreveu:
> Also, I notice on the exception above it's coming from openejb code here...
>
> with the comment "// TODO: drop when we get a fully supporting java 9
> version of CXF"
>
> As CXF 3.3.0 supports Java 11, this implies this the call should be removed
> completely and should resolve the above exception.
>
> private static void initAuthenticators() { // TODO: drop when we get a
> fully supporting java 9 version of CXF
> try {
> CXFAuthenticator.addAuthenticator();
> } catch (final RuntimeException re) {
> // we swallow it while cxf doesnt support java 9, this
> workaround is enough to make most of cases passing
> }
> }
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
>
--
Daniel "soro" Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_
Re: Microprofile 1.2.0 + CXF 3.3.0
Posted by j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net>.
Also, I notice on the exception above it's coming from openejb code here...
with the comment "// TODO: drop when we get a fully supporting java 9
version of CXF"
As CXF 3.3.0 supports Java 11, this implies this the call should be removed
completely and should resolve the above exception.
private static void initAuthenticators() { // TODO: drop when we get a
fully supporting java 9 version of CXF
try {
CXFAuthenticator.addAuthenticator();
} catch (final RuntimeException re) {
// we swallow it while cxf doesnt support java 9, this
workaround is enough to make most of cases passing
}
}
--
Sent from: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
Re: Microprofile 1.2.0 + CXF 3.3.0
Posted by Ivan Junckes Filho <iv...@gmail.com>.
Awesome thanks James
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 7:27 AM j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net> wrote:
> This update should probably also be aligned or include the JAXB update ->
> Jakarta EE Maven coordinates because CXF does that too.
>
> I have already done some work on the JAXB. There are several pom.xml
> dependency updates and exclusion changes just for JAXB (it affects
> activation.jar too).
>
> So my Jakarta JAXB 2.3.2 PR that I will submit shortly should be a
> pre-requisite to CXF 3.3.0.
>
> I will also check the JAX-RS change too.
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
>
Re: Microprofile 1.2.0 + CXF 3.3.0
Posted by j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net>.
This update should probably also be aligned or include the JAXB update ->
Jakarta EE Maven coordinates because CXF does that too.
I have already done some work on the JAXB. There are several pom.xml
dependency updates and exclusion changes just for JAXB (it affects
activation.jar too).
So my Jakarta JAXB 2.3.2 PR that I will submit shortly should be a
pre-requisite to CXF 3.3.0.
I will also check the JAX-RS change too.
--
Sent from: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
Re: Microprofile 1.2.0 + CXF 3.3.0
Posted by Ivan Junckes Filho <iv...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Dani I will have a look.
On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 11:04 AM Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Ivan,
>
> Seems that your changes is breaking the build:
>
> java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
> org.apache.cxf.helpers.JavaUtils.isJava9Compatible()Z
> at
>
> org.apache.cxf.transport.http.CXFAuthenticator.addAuthenticator(CXFAuthenticator.java:55)
> at
>
> org.apache.openejb.server.cxf.transport.util.CxfUtil.initAuthenticators(CxfUtil.java:138)
> at
>
> org.apache.openejb.server.cxf.transport.util.CxfUtil.initDefaultBus(CxfUtil.java:128)
> at
>
> org.apache.openejb.server.cxf.transport.util.CxfUtil.getBus(CxfUtil.java:151)
> at
>
> org.apache.openejb.server.cxf.transport.util.CxfUtil.configureBus(CxfUtil.java:290)
> at org.apache.openejb.server.cxf.CxfService.init(CxfService.java:60)
> at
> org.apache.tomee.catalina.TomcatLoader.initialize(TomcatLoader.java:285)
> at org.apache.tomee.embedded.Container.start(Container.java:741)
> at
>
> org.apache.openejb.arquillian.embedded.EmbeddedTomEEContainer.start(EmbeddedTomEEContainer.java:136)
> at
>
> org.jboss.arquillian.container.impl.ContainerImpl.start(ContainerImpl.java:199)
> at
>
> org.jboss.arquillian.container.impl.client.container.ContainerLifecycleController$8.perform(ContainerLifecycleController.java:163)
> at
>
> org.jboss.arquillian.container.impl.client.container.ContainerLifecycleController$8.perform(ContainerLifecycleController.java:157)
> at
>
> org.jboss.arquillian.container.impl.client.container.ContainerLifecycleController.forContainer(ContainerLifecycleController.java:255)
> at
>
> org.jboss.arquillian.container.impl.client.container.ContainerLifecycleController.startContainer(ContainerLifecycleController.java:156)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at
>
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> at
>
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> at
> org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ObserverImpl.invoke(ObserverImpl.java:96)
> at
>
> org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.invokeObservers(EventContextImpl.java:103)
> at
>
> org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.proceed(EventContextImpl.java:85)
> at
>
> org.jboss.arquillian.container.impl.client.ContainerDeploymentContextHandler.createContainerContext(ContainerDeploymentContextHandler.java:57)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at
>
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> at
>
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> at
> org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ObserverImpl.invoke(ObserverImpl.java:96)
> at
>
> org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.proceed(EventContextImpl.java:92)
> at
> org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ManagerImpl.fire(ManagerImpl.java:143)
> at
> org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ManagerImpl.fire(ManagerImpl.java:114)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventImpl.fire(EventImpl.java:67)
> at
>
> org.jboss.arquillian.container.impl.client.container.ContainerLifecycleController$2.perform(ContainerLifecycleController.java:77)
> at
>
> org.jboss.arquillian.container.impl.client.container.ContainerLifecycleController$2.perform(ContainerLifecycleController.java:70)
> at
>
> org.jboss.arquillian.container.impl.client.container.ContainerLifecycleController.forEachSuiteContainer(ContainerLifecycleController.java:221)
> at
>
> org.jboss.arquillian.container.impl.client.container.ContainerLifecycleController.startSuiteContainers(ContainerLifecycleController.java:69)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at
>
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> at
>
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> at
> org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ObserverImpl.invoke(ObserverImpl.java:96)
> at
>
> org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.invokeObservers(EventContextImpl.java:103)
> at
>
> org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.proceed(EventContextImpl.java:85)
> at
> org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ManagerImpl.fire(ManagerImpl.java:143)
> at
> org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ManagerImpl.fire(ManagerImpl.java:114)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventImpl.fire(EventImpl.java:67)
> at
>
> org.jboss.arquillian.container.test.impl.client.ContainerEventController.execute(ContainerEventController.java:86)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at
>
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> at
>
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> at
> org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ObserverImpl.invoke(ObserverImpl.java:96)
> at
>
> org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.invokeObservers(EventContextImpl.java:103)
> at
>
> org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.proceed(EventContextImpl.java:85)
> at
>
> org.jboss.arquillian.test.impl.TestContextHandler.createSuiteContext(TestContextHandler.java:73)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at
>
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> at
>
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> at
> org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ObserverImpl.invoke(ObserverImpl.java:96)
> at
>
> org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.proceed(EventContextImpl.java:92)
> at
> org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ManagerImpl.fire(ManagerImpl.java:143)
> at
> org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ManagerImpl.fire(ManagerImpl.java:114)
> at
>
> org.jboss.arquillian.test.impl.EventTestRunnerAdaptor.beforeSuite(EventTestRunnerAdaptor.java:75)
> at org.jboss.arquillian.junit.Arquillian.run(Arquillian.java:116)
> at
>
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:283)
> at
>
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:173)
> at
>
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:153)
> at
>
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:128)
>
>
> Results :
>
> Tests in error:
> jug.rest.SubjectServiceTest.jug.rest.SubjectServiceTest
> Run 1: SubjectServiceTest.start:56 » Initialization
> java.lang.IllegalStateException: ...
> Run 2: SubjectServiceTest.stop:67 NullPointer
>
>
>
> JUnit4Provider.invoke:128->executeTestSet:153->executeWithRerun:173->execute:283
> » NoSuchMethod
>
> Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 2, Skipped: 0
>
>
>
> Em sex, 22 de fev de 2019 às 18:02, Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org>
> escreveu:
>
> > Hi Ivan,
> >
> > I can take a look on your PR and review it later.
> > I'll send some notes when have the review done.
> >
> >
> > Kind regards. :)
> >
> >
> > Em sex, 22 de fev de 2019 5:12 PM, Ivan Junckes Filho <
> > ivanjunckes@gmail.com> escreveu:
> >
> >> I am not sure about those dependency changes, I didn't run the build
> >> locally it takes hours here in my computer.
> >>
> >> Any commiter can please build my PR in ASF infra to see if the tests
> pass?
> >>
> >> On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 3:16 PM j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Added a comment to the PR as I remember seeing major dependency
> changes
> >> > with
> >> > CXF 3.3 which might impact.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Sent from:
> >> > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
> --
> Daniel "soro" Cunha
> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>
Re: Microprofile 1.2.0 + CXF 3.3.0
Posted by Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org>.
Hi Ivan,
Seems that your changes is breaking the build:
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
org.apache.cxf.helpers.JavaUtils.isJava9Compatible()Z
at
org.apache.cxf.transport.http.CXFAuthenticator.addAuthenticator(CXFAuthenticator.java:55)
at
org.apache.openejb.server.cxf.transport.util.CxfUtil.initAuthenticators(CxfUtil.java:138)
at
org.apache.openejb.server.cxf.transport.util.CxfUtil.initDefaultBus(CxfUtil.java:128)
at
org.apache.openejb.server.cxf.transport.util.CxfUtil.getBus(CxfUtil.java:151)
at
org.apache.openejb.server.cxf.transport.util.CxfUtil.configureBus(CxfUtil.java:290)
at org.apache.openejb.server.cxf.CxfService.init(CxfService.java:60)
at
org.apache.tomee.catalina.TomcatLoader.initialize(TomcatLoader.java:285)
at org.apache.tomee.embedded.Container.start(Container.java:741)
at
org.apache.openejb.arquillian.embedded.EmbeddedTomEEContainer.start(EmbeddedTomEEContainer.java:136)
at
org.jboss.arquillian.container.impl.ContainerImpl.start(ContainerImpl.java:199)
at
org.jboss.arquillian.container.impl.client.container.ContainerLifecycleController$8.perform(ContainerLifecycleController.java:163)
at
org.jboss.arquillian.container.impl.client.container.ContainerLifecycleController$8.perform(ContainerLifecycleController.java:157)
at
org.jboss.arquillian.container.impl.client.container.ContainerLifecycleController.forContainer(ContainerLifecycleController.java:255)
at
org.jboss.arquillian.container.impl.client.container.ContainerLifecycleController.startContainer(ContainerLifecycleController.java:156)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at
org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ObserverImpl.invoke(ObserverImpl.java:96)
at
org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.invokeObservers(EventContextImpl.java:103)
at
org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.proceed(EventContextImpl.java:85)
at
org.jboss.arquillian.container.impl.client.ContainerDeploymentContextHandler.createContainerContext(ContainerDeploymentContextHandler.java:57)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at
org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ObserverImpl.invoke(ObserverImpl.java:96)
at
org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.proceed(EventContextImpl.java:92)
at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ManagerImpl.fire(ManagerImpl.java:143)
at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ManagerImpl.fire(ManagerImpl.java:114)
at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventImpl.fire(EventImpl.java:67)
at
org.jboss.arquillian.container.impl.client.container.ContainerLifecycleController$2.perform(ContainerLifecycleController.java:77)
at
org.jboss.arquillian.container.impl.client.container.ContainerLifecycleController$2.perform(ContainerLifecycleController.java:70)
at
org.jboss.arquillian.container.impl.client.container.ContainerLifecycleController.forEachSuiteContainer(ContainerLifecycleController.java:221)
at
org.jboss.arquillian.container.impl.client.container.ContainerLifecycleController.startSuiteContainers(ContainerLifecycleController.java:69)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at
org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ObserverImpl.invoke(ObserverImpl.java:96)
at
org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.invokeObservers(EventContextImpl.java:103)
at
org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.proceed(EventContextImpl.java:85)
at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ManagerImpl.fire(ManagerImpl.java:143)
at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ManagerImpl.fire(ManagerImpl.java:114)
at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventImpl.fire(EventImpl.java:67)
at
org.jboss.arquillian.container.test.impl.client.ContainerEventController.execute(ContainerEventController.java:86)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at
org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ObserverImpl.invoke(ObserverImpl.java:96)
at
org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.invokeObservers(EventContextImpl.java:103)
at
org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.proceed(EventContextImpl.java:85)
at
org.jboss.arquillian.test.impl.TestContextHandler.createSuiteContext(TestContextHandler.java:73)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at
org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ObserverImpl.invoke(ObserverImpl.java:96)
at
org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.proceed(EventContextImpl.java:92)
at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ManagerImpl.fire(ManagerImpl.java:143)
at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ManagerImpl.fire(ManagerImpl.java:114)
at
org.jboss.arquillian.test.impl.EventTestRunnerAdaptor.beforeSuite(EventTestRunnerAdaptor.java:75)
at org.jboss.arquillian.junit.Arquillian.run(Arquillian.java:116)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:283)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:173)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:153)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:128)
Results :
Tests in error:
jug.rest.SubjectServiceTest.jug.rest.SubjectServiceTest
Run 1: SubjectServiceTest.start:56 » Initialization
java.lang.IllegalStateException: ...
Run 2: SubjectServiceTest.stop:67 NullPointer
JUnit4Provider.invoke:128->executeTestSet:153->executeWithRerun:173->execute:283
» NoSuchMethod
Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 2, Skipped: 0
Em sex, 22 de fev de 2019 às 18:02, Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org>
escreveu:
> Hi Ivan,
>
> I can take a look on your PR and review it later.
> I'll send some notes when have the review done.
>
>
> Kind regards. :)
>
>
> Em sex, 22 de fev de 2019 5:12 PM, Ivan Junckes Filho <
> ivanjunckes@gmail.com> escreveu:
>
>> I am not sure about those dependency changes, I didn't run the build
>> locally it takes hours here in my computer.
>>
>> Any commiter can please build my PR in ASF infra to see if the tests pass?
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 3:16 PM j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net> wrote:
>>
>> > Added a comment to the PR as I remember seeing major dependency changes
>> > with
>> > CXF 3.3 which might impact.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Sent from:
>> > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
>> >
>>
>
--
Daniel "soro" Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_
Re: Microprofile 1.2.0 + CXF 3.3.0
Posted by Daniel Cunha <da...@apache.org>.
Hi Ivan,
I can take a look on your PR and review it later.
I'll send some notes when have the review done.
Kind regards. :)
Em sex, 22 de fev de 2019 5:12 PM, Ivan Junckes Filho <iv...@gmail.com>
escreveu:
> I am not sure about those dependency changes, I didn't run the build
> locally it takes hours here in my computer.
>
> Any commiter can please build my PR in ASF infra to see if the tests pass?
>
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 3:16 PM j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net> wrote:
>
> > Added a comment to the PR as I remember seeing major dependency changes
> > with
> > CXF 3.3 which might impact.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sent from:
> > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
> >
>
Re: Microprofile 1.2.0 + CXF 3.3.0
Posted by Ivan Junckes Filho <iv...@gmail.com>.
I am not sure about those dependency changes, I didn't run the build
locally it takes hours here in my computer.
Any commiter can please build my PR in ASF infra to see if the tests pass?
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 3:16 PM j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net> wrote:
> Added a comment to the PR as I remember seeing major dependency changes
> with
> CXF 3.3 which might impact.
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html
>
Re: Microprofile 1.2.0 + CXF 3.3.0
Posted by j4fm <ja...@my-managed.net>.
Added a comment to the PR as I remember seeing major dependency changes with
CXF 3.3 which might impact.
--
Sent from: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Dev-f982480.html