You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cayenne.apache.org by "Bruno J. M. Melo" <br...@gmail.com> on 2006/06/18 00:17:09 UTC
Cayenne Plug-in as a CayenneModeler Plus...
Hi All,
I'm going to follow the Andrus' suggestion about create the Cayenne
Eclipse Plug-in as a CayenneModeler "Plus" using the cayenne cross-JVM
messaging mechanism. However, I think to do this is necessary change
(include) some things inside CayenneModeler. My question: Does anybody know
another solution to this??
(Suggestion) IMHO, I think that an interesting feature in CayenneModeler
could be the ability to create "plug-ins" to add new functionalities, and
customize certain actions, etc.
Thanks! and sorry any english mistake...
Regards,
--
>> bruno
Re: Cayenne Plug-in as a CayenneModeler Plus...
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
Actually we just started prototyping of Cayenne plugin engine:
http://objectstyle.org/cayenne/lists/cayenne-devel/2006/06/0026.html
I don't think I'll have time until after July 5 to change the Modeler
code to act as a Platonos plugin, but we are going in this direction.
Andrus
On Jun 18, 2006, at 2:17 AM, Bruno J. M. Melo wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm going to follow the Andrus' suggestion about create the Cayenne
> Eclipse Plug-in as a CayenneModeler "Plus" using the cayenne cross-JVM
> messaging mechanism. However, I think to do this is necessary change
> (include) some things inside CayenneModeler. My question: Does
> anybody know
> another solution to this??
>
> (Suggestion) IMHO, I think that an interesting feature in
> CayenneModeler
> could be the ability to create "plug-ins" to add new
> functionalities, and
> customize certain actions, etc.
>
> Thanks! and sorry any english mistake...
>
> Regards,
> --
>>> bruno
Re: Cayenne Plug-in as a CayenneModeler Plus...
Posted by Adrian Wiesmann <aw...@somap.org>.
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 17:10:37 +0400 Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
> > What about JPF?
>
> We can't use it because of LGPL license.
>
> > So the decision for Platonos is final?
>
> I haven't seen any alternatives with BSD or Apache license.
Just wondering because I made some good experiences messing around with
that: Have you ever looked at the Eclipse Plugin mechanism or have you
thought about using/creating something like that for Cayenne (instead of
using Platoon)?
Adrian
Re: Cayenne Plug-in as a CayenneModeler Plus...
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
> What about JPF?
We can't use it because of LGPL license.
> So the decision for Platonos is final?
I haven't seen any alternatives with BSD or Apache license.
Andrus
On Jun 18, 2006, at 4:06 PM, Ahmed Mohombe wrote:
>> Actually we just started prototyping of Cayenne plugin engine:
>> http://objectstyle.org/cayenne/lists/cayenne-devel/2006/06/0026.html
>> I don't think I'll have time until after July 5 to change the
>> Modeler code to act as a Platonos plugin, but we are going in this
>> direction.
> So the decision for Platonos is final?
>
> What about JPF?
> http://jpf.sourceforge.net/
> (http://sourceforge.net/projects/jpf)
> Have you evaluated it against Platonos?
>
> IMHO JPF:
> - looks less "abandoned" :).
> - the authors still respond to user questions.
> - has much, much more documentation.
> - it's structure docs and architecture look cleaner to me(but this is
> subjective) (even the platonos VCS repository structure looks like
> a complete
> mess)
>
>
> Ahmed.
>
>
Re: Cayenne Plug-in as a CayenneModeler Plus...
Posted by Ahmed Mohombe <am...@yahoo.com>.
>> What about JPF?
>
> We can't use it because of LGPL license.
Why do you care?
CM would be a set of plug-ins for that project, so where's the problem?
For that "platform/project" one can develop even commercial or any kind of licensed
plug-ins: even BSD.
Ahmed.
Re: Cayenne Plug-in as a CayenneModeler Plus...
Posted by Ahmed Mohombe <am...@yahoo.com>.
> Actually we just started prototyping of Cayenne plugin engine:
>
> http://objectstyle.org/cayenne/lists/cayenne-devel/2006/06/0026.html
>
> I don't think I'll have time until after July 5 to change the Modeler
> code to act as a Platonos plugin, but we are going in this direction.
So the decision for Platonos is final?
What about JPF?
http://jpf.sourceforge.net/
(http://sourceforge.net/projects/jpf)
Have you evaluated it against Platonos?
IMHO JPF:
- looks less "abandoned" :).
- the authors still respond to user questions.
- has much, much more documentation.
- it's structure docs and architecture look cleaner to me(but this is
subjective) (even the platonos VCS repository structure looks like a complete
mess)
Ahmed.