You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by Radu Gheorghe <ra...@sematext.com> on 2020/12/04 06:38:21 UTC
Re: facet.method=smart
Hi Jae,
No, it’s not smarter than explicitly defining, for example enum for a low-cardinality field.
Think of “smart” as a default path, and explicit definitions as some “hints”. You can see that default path in this function: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/master/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/facet/FacetField.java#L74
Note that I’ve added a PR with a bit more explanations for the “hits” here: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2057 But if you’re missing some info, please feel free to comment (here or there), I could add some more info.
Best regards,
Radu
--
Sematext Cloud - Full Stack Observability - https://sematext.com
Solr and Elasticsearch Consulting, Training and Production Support
> On 30 Nov 2020, at 22:46, Jae Joo <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Is "smart" really smarter than one explicitly defined?
>
> For "emun" type, would it be faster to define facet.method=enum than smart?
>
> Jae
Re: facet.method=smart
Posted by Jae Joo <ja...@gmail.com>.
Thanks!
Jae
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 1:38 AM Radu Gheorghe <ra...@sematext.com>
wrote:
> Hi Jae,
>
> No, it’s not smarter than explicitly defining, for example enum for a
> low-cardinality field.
>
> Think of “smart” as a default path, and explicit definitions as some
> “hints”. You can see that default path in this function:
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/master/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/facet/FacetField.java#L74
>
> Note that I’ve added a PR with a bit more explanations for the “hits”
> here: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2057 But if you’re
> missing some info, please feel free to comment (here or there), I could add
> some more info.
>
> Best regards,
> Radu
> --
> Sematext Cloud - Full Stack Observability - https://sematext.com
> Solr and Elasticsearch Consulting, Training and Production Support
>
> > On 30 Nov 2020, at 22:46, Jae Joo <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Is "smart" really smarter than one explicitly defined?
> >
> > For "emun" type, would it be faster to define facet.method=enum than
> smart?
> >
> > Jae
>
>