You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hama.apache.org by "Edward J. Yoon (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/08/25 08:21:15 UTC

[jira] Resolved: (HAMA-283) Duplicate code regarding default configuration files for Hama

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Edward J. Yoon resolved HAMA-283.
---------------------------------

    Fix Version/s: 0.2.0
       Resolution: Fixed

I've just committed this. hard coded path of conf files also removed.
Thanks Filipe.

> Duplicate code regarding default configuration files for Hama
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HAMA-283
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-283
>             Project: Hama
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Filipe Manana
>            Assignee: Filipe Manana
>            Priority: Trivial
>             Fix For: 0.2.0
>
>         Attachments: HAMA-283.patch
>
>
> While doing my first Hama code walks, I noticed the exact same static block initializer in the classes BSPMaster, GroomServer and BSPJobContext:
> static {
>     Configuration.addDefaultResource("hama-default.xml");
>     Configuration.addDefaultResource("hama-site.xml");
> }
> However, in the org.apache.hama.HamaConfiguration  class the constructor calls the following method:
> private void addHamaResources() {
>     Configuration.addDefaultResource("hama-default.xml");
>     Configuration.addDefaultResource("hama-site.xml");
>   }
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but this does exactly the same, right?
> With the following patch, which removes the static initializers, all the tests are passing.
> cheers

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.