You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@bookkeeper.apache.org by "Ivan Kelly (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/11/27 15:26:04 UTC

[jira] [Created] (BOOKKEEPER-483) precommit tests only check toplevel rat file, not the one for submodules.

Ivan Kelly created BOOKKEEPER-483:
-------------------------------------

             Summary: precommit tests only check toplevel rat file, not the one for submodules.
                 Key: BOOKKEEPER-483
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-483
             Project: Bookkeeper
          Issue Type: Bug
            Reporter: Ivan Kelly
            Assignee: Ivan Kelly


Therefore, not all rat errors are detected.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

[jira] [Updated] (BOOKKEEPER-483) precommit tests only check toplevel rat file, not the one for submodules.

Posted by "Ivan Kelly (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Ivan Kelly updated BOOKKEEPER-483:
----------------------------------

    Attachment: 0001-BOOKKEEPER-483-check-all-modules-for-rat-errors.patch
    
> precommit tests only check toplevel rat file, not the one for submodules.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BOOKKEEPER-483
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-483
>             Project: Bookkeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Ivan Kelly
>            Assignee: Ivan Kelly
>             Fix For: 4.2.0
>
>         Attachments: 0001-BOOKKEEPER-483-check-all-modules-for-rat-errors.patch
>
>
> Therefore, not all rat errors are detected.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-483) precommit tests only check toplevel rat file, not the one for submodules.

Posted by "Flavio Junqueira (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13509038#comment-13509038 ] 

Flavio Junqueira commented on BOOKKEEPER-483:
---------------------------------------------

The patch is quite simple and it looks good to me. I checked the output of QA and it looks right to me. I just need a quick question: should we see the execution of "copyRatFiles clean" in the console output of the build? I can see the ones of "copyRatFiles patch" but not the one for clean.
                
> precommit tests only check toplevel rat file, not the one for submodules.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BOOKKEEPER-483
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-483
>             Project: Bookkeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Ivan Kelly
>            Assignee: Ivan Kelly
>             Fix For: 4.2.0
>
>         Attachments: 0001-BOOKKEEPER-483-check-all-modules-for-rat-errors.patch
>
>
> Therefore, not all rat errors are detected.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-483) precommit tests only check toplevel rat file, not the one for submodules.

Posted by "Ivan Kelly (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13509809#comment-13509809 ] 

Ivan Kelly commented on BOOKKEEPER-483:
---------------------------------------

because when the RAT task runs for clean, this patch has not been applied, therefore it won't do the copy. Once this patch is in, you'll see it for both.
                
> precommit tests only check toplevel rat file, not the one for submodules.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BOOKKEEPER-483
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-483
>             Project: Bookkeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Ivan Kelly
>            Assignee: Ivan Kelly
>             Fix For: 4.2.0
>
>         Attachments: 0001-BOOKKEEPER-483-check-all-modules-for-rat-errors.patch
>
>
> Therefore, not all rat errors are detected.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-483) precommit tests only check toplevel rat file, not the one for submodules.

Posted by "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13504821#comment-13504821 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on BOOKKEEPER-483:
--------------------------------------

Testing JIRA BOOKKEEPER-483

WARNING: Running test-patch on a dirty local svn workspace

Patch <a href="/jira/secure/attachment/12555013/0001-BOOKKEEPER-483-check-all-modules-for-rat-errors.patch">/jira/secure/attachment/12555013/0001-BOOKKEEPER-483-check-all-modules-for-rat-errors.patch</a> downloaded at Tue Nov 27 18:12:18 UTC 2012

----------------------------

{color:green}+1 PATCH_APPLIES{color}
{color:green}+1 CLEAN{color}
{color:green}+1 RAW_PATCH_ANALYSIS{color}
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any @author tags
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any tabs
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any trailing spaces
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any line longer than 120
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does adds/modifies 1 testcase(s)
{color:green}+1 RAT{color}
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new RAT warnings
{color:green}+1 JAVADOC{color}
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new Javadoc warnings
.    {color:red}WARNING{color}: the current HEAD has 8 Javadoc warning(s)
{color:green}+1 COMPILE{color}
.    {color:green}+1{color} HEAD compiles
.    {color:green}+1{color} patch compiles
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new javac warnings
.    {color:red}WARNING{color}: the current HEAD has 9 javac warning(s)
{color:green}+1 FINDBUGS{color}
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new Findbugs warnings
.    {color:red}WARNING: the current HEAD has  Findbugs warning(s), they should be addressed ASAP{color}
{color:green}+1 TESTS{color}
.    Tests run: 389
{color:green}+1 DISTRO{color}
.    {color:green}+1{color} distro tarball builds with the patch 

----------------------------
{color:green}*+1 Overall result, good!, no -1s*{color}

{color:red}.   There is at least one warning, please check{color}

The full output of the test-patch run is available at

.   https://builds.apache.org/job/bookkeeper-trunk-precommit-build/43/
                
> precommit tests only check toplevel rat file, not the one for submodules.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BOOKKEEPER-483
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-483
>             Project: Bookkeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Ivan Kelly
>            Assignee: Ivan Kelly
>             Fix For: 4.2.0
>
>         Attachments: 0001-BOOKKEEPER-483-check-all-modules-for-rat-errors.patch
>
>
> Therefore, not all rat errors are detected.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-483) precommit tests only check toplevel rat file, not the one for submodules.

Posted by "Flavio Junqueira (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13509826#comment-13509826 ] 

Flavio Junqueira commented on BOOKKEEPER-483:
---------------------------------------------

Perhaps I don't understand very well what's going on and my observation might be naive. I thought that with the pre-commit I was supposed to see it because it runs with the patch applied, but perhaps it still uses the unpatched scripts. Could you clarify just for my own understanding, please? 
                
> precommit tests only check toplevel rat file, not the one for submodules.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BOOKKEEPER-483
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-483
>             Project: Bookkeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Ivan Kelly
>            Assignee: Ivan Kelly
>             Fix For: 4.2.0
>
>         Attachments: 0001-BOOKKEEPER-483-check-all-modules-for-rat-errors.patch
>
>
> Therefore, not all rat errors are detected.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

[jira] [Comment Edited] (BOOKKEEPER-483) precommit tests only check toplevel rat file, not the one for submodules.

Posted by "Flavio Junqueira (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13509038#comment-13509038 ] 

Flavio Junqueira edited comment on BOOKKEEPER-483 at 12/3/12 9:10 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The patch is quite simple and it looks good to me. I checked the output of QA and it looks right to me. I just need a quick clarification: should we see the execution of "copyRatFiles clean" in the console output of the build? I can see the ones of "copyRatFiles patch" but not the one for clean.
                
      was (Author: fpj):
    The patch is quite simple and it looks good to me. I checked the output of QA and it looks right to me. I just need a quick question: should we see the execution of "copyRatFiles clean" in the console output of the build? I can see the ones of "copyRatFiles patch" but not the one for clean.
                  
> precommit tests only check toplevel rat file, not the one for submodules.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BOOKKEEPER-483
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-483
>             Project: Bookkeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Ivan Kelly
>            Assignee: Ivan Kelly
>             Fix For: 4.2.0
>
>         Attachments: 0001-BOOKKEEPER-483-check-all-modules-for-rat-errors.patch
>
>
> Therefore, not all rat errors are detected.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira