You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@poi.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2003/02/08 17:41:11 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9576] -
[PATCH] DBCELL, INDEX EXTSST (was Acess 97 import)
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9576>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9576
[PATCH] DBCELL, INDEX EXTSST (was Acess 97 import)
acoliver@apache.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
Summary|[PATCH] xls import into MS |[PATCH] DBCELL, INDEX EXTSST
|Access 97 does not work |(was Acess 97 import)
------- Additional Comments From acoliver@apache.org 2003-02-08 16:41 -------
I had trouble apply this so I did cvs update -r version against the Sheet and
Workbook, where version = the version cited in the patch. Applied, did cvs
update -A for sheet and workbook and recompiled/tested. this seems to have
worked for compilation. Before releasing we need to make sure these sheets work
in excel. Also while the unit tests pass, I do not see NEW unit tests for
EXTSST/ DBCELL and INDEX. I would really like to see those submited because I
guarantee we're going to break these like OVER and OVER again otherwise. I
promise absolutely!
In anycase, a test failed (and boy formulas took forever):
Running org.apache.poi.hssf.usermodel.TestNamedRange
Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.824 sec
BUILD FAILED
/home/andy/poipatch/jakarta-poi/tools/cents/junit.cent/xbuild.xml:59: Test
org.apache.poi.hssf.usermodel.TestNamedRange failed
Total time: 5 minutes 51 seconds
formula test:
Running org.apache.poi.hssf.usermodel.TestFormulas
Tests run: 21, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 236.824 sec
I think we need some more consideration here, I'm sorry to say. Can you look
into this further?