You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> on 2007/11/30 18:17:24 UTC
Stable MyFaces 1.2.1 OR open issues for 1.2.1 ? (was Re: Help with Myfaces-core-1.2.0)
This user was able to *swap* the RI out and put the 121-SNAPSHOT in.
I think, that is a good point to kick a release out.
Are there any bugs open, that needs to make it into 121-line ?
Should we just release it?
Or should we provide at least an RC (release_candidate) ?
-Matthias
On Nov 30, 2007 6:06 PM, Zheng, Xiahong <Xi...@fmr.com> wrote:
> The snapshot works. Thanks a lot.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mwessendorf@gmail.com [mailto:mwessendorf@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 11:56 AM
> To: MyFaces Discussion
> Subject: Re: Help with Myfaces-core-1.2.0
>
> These files are the 121 API/IMPL
>
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/myfaces/
> core/myfaces-api/1.2.1-SNAPSHOT/
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/myfaces/
> core/myfaces-impl/1.2.1-SNAPSHOT/
>
>
>
> On Nov 30, 2007 5:52 PM, Zheng, Xiahong <Xi...@fmr.com> wrote:
> > Thanks, where can get the 1.2.1 snapshot?
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: mwessendorf@gmail.com [mailto:mwessendorf@gmail.com] On Behalf
> Of
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> > Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 11:17 AM
> > To: MyFaces Discussion
> > Subject: Re: Help with Myfaces-core-1.2.0
> >
> > to make it short.
> >
> > A 1.2.1 will be out soon.
> > That is more! stable.
> >
> > Perhaps you just try a recent snapshot or wait ?
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> > On Nov 30, 2007 5:15 PM, Zheng, Xiahong <Xi...@fmr.com> wrote:
> > > Hi there,
> > >
> > > I recently downloaded myfaces-core-1.2.0 and thought to give it a
> try
> > on
> > > my existing RI1.2 based example app on tomcat-6.0. I simply replaced
> > the
> > > jsf-api.jar and jsf-impl.jar with myfaces-api-1.2.0.jar and
> > > myfaces-impl-1.2.0.jar plus the common jars they depend on. However,
> > > when I hit the page, it gives the following stacktrace,
> > >
> > > org.apache.jasper.JasperException: /index.jsp(15,21) According to
> TLD
> > or
> > > attribute directive in tag file, attribute value does not accept any
> > > expressions
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.jasper.compiler.DefaultErrorHandler.jspError(DefaultErrorHand
> > > ler.java:40)
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.jasper.compiler.ErrorDispatcher.dispatch(ErrorDispatcher.java
> > > :407)
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.jasper.compiler.ErrorDispatcher.jspError(ErrorDispatcher.java
> > > :148)
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.jasper.compiler.Validator$ValidateVisitor.checkXmlAttributes(
> > > Validator.java:1172)
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.jasper.compiler.Validator$ValidateVisitor.visit(Validator.jav
> > > a:819)
> > >
> > org.apache.jasper.compiler.Node$CustomTag.accept(Node.java:1507)
> > > org.apache.jasper.compiler.Node$Nodes.visit(Node.java:2336)
> > >
> > > org.apache.jasper.compiler.Node$Visitor.visitBody(Node.java:2386)
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.jasper.compiler.Validator$ValidateVisitor.visit(Validator.jav
> > > a:838)
> > >
> > org.apache.jasper.compiler.Node$CustomTag.accept(Node.java:1507)
> > > org.apache.jasper.compiler.Node$Nodes.visit(Node.java:2336)
> > >
> > > org.apache.jasper.compiler.Node$Visitor.visitBody(Node.java:2386)
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.jasper.compiler.Validator$ValidateVisitor.visit(Validator.jav
> > > a:838)
> > >
> > org.apache.jasper.compiler.Node$CustomTag.accept(Node.java:1507)
> > > org.apache.jasper.compiler.Node$Nodes.visit(Node.java:2336)
> > >
> > > org.apache.jasper.compiler.Node$Visitor.visitBody(Node.java:2386)
> > >
> org.apache.jasper.compiler.Node$Visitor.visit(Node.java:2392)
> > > org.apache.jasper.compiler.Node$Root.accept(Node.java:489)
> > > org.apache.jasper.compiler.Node$Nodes.visit(Node.java:2336)
> > >
> > > org.apache.jasper.compiler.Validator.validate(Validator.java:1737)
> > >
> > > org.apache.jasper.compiler.Compiler.generateJava(Compiler.java:178)
> > >
> org.apache.jasper.compiler.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java:306)
> > >
> org.apache.jasper.compiler.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java:286)
> > >
> org.apache.jasper.compiler.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java:273)
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.jasper.JspCompilationContext.compile(JspCompilationContext.ja
> > > va:566)
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.ja
> > > va:317)
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:320)
> > >
> > > org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:266)
> > > javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:803)
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.myfaces.context.servlet.ServletExternalContextImpl.dispatch(S
> > > ervletExternalContextImpl.java:334)
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.myfaces.application.jsp.JspViewHandlerImpl.renderView(JspView
> > > HandlerImpl.java:254)
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.myfaces.lifecycle.RenderResponseExecutor.execute(RenderRespon
> > > seExecutor.java:41)
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.myfaces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.render(LifecycleImpl.java:132
> > > )
> > >
> javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet.service(FacesServlet.java:138)
> > >
> > >
> > > note The full stack trace of the root cause is available in the
> Apache
> > > Tomcat/6.0.13 logs.
> > >
> > > Line 15: <h:inputText value="#{user.name}"/>
> > >
> > > Any idea?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > XZ
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: Stable MyFaces 1.2.1 OR open issues for 1.2.1 ? (was Re: Help with Myfaces-core-1.2.0)
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
this is great news ?
Is there a blog entry for this ? :)
Please ping the Seam-users (via their forum).
Thanks!!
Next weekend, there is the hackaton, let's wait till then, ok ?
-Matthias
On Dec 5, 2007 7:08 PM, Grant Smith <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> OK I managed to get MyFaces 1.2.1-SNAPSHOT and Seam 2.0.0GA working without
> problem !
>
> I would say it is a great time to release :)
>
>
>
> On Nov 30, 2007 1:58 PM, Matthias Wessendorf < matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> > cool!
> > a nice wiki page!!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Nov 30, 2007 7:43 PM, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > And on one of the console outputs from the how-to, it is possible to
> > > read that MyFaces is initializing
> > >
> > >
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxSAMPLES/Running+JBoss+Seam+2.0.0.GA+on+Geronimo+2.1
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Bruno
> > >
> > >
> > > On 30/11/2007, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I have seen a message today on the Geronimo's mailing list with a
> > > > howto on running seam on Geronimo. That should mean that it runs fine
> > > > with myfaces...
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >
> > > > Bruno
> > > >
> > > > On 30/11/2007, Matthias Wessendorf < matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > Grant, if you are using Seam or active in that community,
> > > > > please try the combi :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > On Nov 30, 2007 6:55 PM, Grant Smith < work.grant@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Does anyone have any experience with this potential release, and
> Seam
> > > > > > 2.0.0.GA ? Recently (well about 4 months ago now), Seam dumped
> Myfaces in
> > > > > > favor of the RI, so it would be excellent to get our foot back in
> that door,
> > > > > > so to speak.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Nov 30, 2007 9:32 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > k
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Nov 30, 2007 6:30 PM, Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Nov 30, 2007, at 12:17 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > This user was able to *swap* the RI out and put the
> 121-SNAPSHOT in.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I think, that is a good point to kick a release out.
> > > > > > > > > Are there any bugs open, that needs to make it into 121-line
> ?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Should we just release it?
> > > > > > > > > Or should we provide at least an RC (release_candidate) ?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I think it would be OK to go ahead and release. If we want
> to get
> > > > > > > > some feedback on its quality then we could conduct voting like
> the
> > > > > > > > Tomcat team does. They tag a release, create the binaries,
> and then
> > > > > > > > vote the binaries as being broken, alpha, beta, or stable.
> For
> > > > > > > > example see:
> > > > > > > >
> http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-build-6.0.10-tf3239720.html
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > That system seems to work pretty well and doesn't leave any RC
> bits
> > > > > > > > lying around.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Best wishes,
> > > > > > > > Paul
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Grant Smith
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > >
> > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> >
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Grant Smith
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: Stable MyFaces 1.2.1 OR open issues for 1.2.1 ? (was Re: Help with Myfaces-core-1.2.0)
Posted by Grant Smith <wo...@gmail.com>.
OK I managed to get MyFaces 1.2.1-SNAPSHOT and Seam 2.0.0GA working without
problem !
I would say it is a great time to release :)
On Nov 30, 2007 1:58 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> cool!
> a nice wiki page!!
>
> On Nov 30, 2007 7:43 PM, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > And on one of the console outputs from the how-to, it is possible to
> > read that MyFaces is initializing
> >
> >
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxSAMPLES/Running+JBoss+Seam+2.0.0.GA+on+Geronimo+2.1
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Bruno
> >
> >
> > On 30/11/2007, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I have seen a message today on the Geronimo's mailing list with a
> > > howto on running seam on Geronimo. That should mean that it runs fine
> > > with myfaces...
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Bruno
> > >
> > > On 30/11/2007, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > Grant, if you are using Seam or active in that community,
> > > > please try the combi :-)
> > > >
> > > > On Nov 30, 2007 6:55 PM, Grant Smith <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Does anyone have any experience with this potential release, and
> Seam
> > > > > 2.0.0.GA ? Recently (well about 4 months ago now), Seam dumped
> Myfaces in
> > > > > favor of the RI, so it would be excellent to get our foot back in
> that door,
> > > > > so to speak.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Nov 30, 2007 9:32 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > > > > k
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Nov 30, 2007 6:30 PM, Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > On Nov 30, 2007, at 12:17 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This user was able to *swap* the RI out and put the
> 121-SNAPSHOT in.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I think, that is a good point to kick a release out.
> > > > > > > > Are there any bugs open, that needs to make it into 121-line
> ?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Should we just release it?
> > > > > > > > Or should we provide at least an RC (release_candidate) ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I think it would be OK to go ahead and release. If we want
> to get
> > > > > > > some feedback on its quality then we could conduct voting like
> the
> > > > > > > Tomcat team does. They tag a release, create the binaries,
> and then
> > > > > > > vote the binaries as being broken, alpha, beta, or stable.
> For
> > > > > > > example see:
> > > > > > >
> http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-build-6.0.10-tf3239720.html
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > That system seems to work pretty well and doesn't leave any RC
> bits
> > > > > > > lying around.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best wishes,
> > > > > > > Paul
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > >
> > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Grant Smith
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > >
> > > > further stuff:
> > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>
--
Grant Smith
Re: Stable MyFaces 1.2.1 OR open issues for 1.2.1 ? (was Re: Help with Myfaces-core-1.2.0)
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
cool!
a nice wiki page!!
On Nov 30, 2007 7:43 PM, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> And on one of the console outputs from the how-to, it is possible to
> read that MyFaces is initializing
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxSAMPLES/Running+JBoss+Seam+2.0.0.GA+on+Geronimo+2.1
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bruno
>
>
> On 30/11/2007, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I have seen a message today on the Geronimo's mailing list with a
> > howto on running seam on Geronimo. That should mean that it runs fine
> > with myfaces...
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Bruno
> >
> > On 30/11/2007, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > Grant, if you are using Seam or active in that community,
> > > please try the combi :-)
> > >
> > > On Nov 30, 2007 6:55 PM, Grant Smith <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Does anyone have any experience with this potential release, and Seam
> > > > 2.0.0.GA ? Recently (well about 4 months ago now), Seam dumped Myfaces in
> > > > favor of the RI, so it would be excellent to get our foot back in that door,
> > > > so to speak.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Nov 30, 2007 9:32 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > k
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Nov 30, 2007 6:30 PM, Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > On Nov 30, 2007, at 12:17 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > This user was able to *swap* the RI out and put the 121-SNAPSHOT in.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I think, that is a good point to kick a release out.
> > > > > > > Are there any bugs open, that needs to make it into 121-line ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Should we just release it?
> > > > > > > Or should we provide at least an RC (release_candidate) ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think it would be OK to go ahead and release. If we want to get
> > > > > > some feedback on its quality then we could conduct voting like the
> > > > > > Tomcat team does. They tag a release, create the binaries, and then
> > > > > > vote the binaries as being broken, alpha, beta, or stable. For
> > > > > > example see:
> > > > > > http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-build-6.0.10-tf3239720.html
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That system seems to work pretty well and doesn't leave any RC bits
> > > > > > lying around.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best wishes,
> > > > > > Paul
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > >
> > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Grant Smith
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > further stuff:
> > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > >
> >
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: Stable MyFaces 1.2.1 OR open issues for 1.2.1 ? (was Re: Help with Myfaces-core-1.2.0)
Posted by Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>.
And on one of the console outputs from the how-to, it is possible to
read that MyFaces is initializing
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxSAMPLES/Running+JBoss+Seam+2.0.0.GA+on+Geronimo+2.1
Cheers,
Bruno
On 30/11/2007, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have seen a message today on the Geronimo's mailing list with a
> howto on running seam on Geronimo. That should mean that it runs fine
> with myfaces...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bruno
>
> On 30/11/2007, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Grant, if you are using Seam or active in that community,
> > please try the combi :-)
> >
> > On Nov 30, 2007 6:55 PM, Grant Smith <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Does anyone have any experience with this potential release, and Seam
> > > 2.0.0.GA ? Recently (well about 4 months ago now), Seam dumped Myfaces in
> > > favor of the RI, so it would be excellent to get our foot back in that door,
> > > so to speak.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Nov 30, 2007 9:32 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > k
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Nov 30, 2007 6:30 PM, Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Nov 30, 2007, at 12:17 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > This user was able to *swap* the RI out and put the 121-SNAPSHOT in.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think, that is a good point to kick a release out.
> > > > > > Are there any bugs open, that needs to make it into 121-line ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Should we just release it?
> > > > > > Or should we provide at least an RC (release_candidate) ?
> > > > >
> > > > > I think it would be OK to go ahead and release. If we want to get
> > > > > some feedback on its quality then we could conduct voting like the
> > > > > Tomcat team does. They tag a release, create the binaries, and then
> > > > > vote the binaries as being broken, alpha, beta, or stable. For
> > > > > example see:
> > > > > http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-build-6.0.10-tf3239720.html
> > > > >
> > > > > That system seems to work pretty well and doesn't leave any RC bits
> > > > > lying around.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Best wishes,
> > > > > Paul
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > >
> > > > further stuff:
> > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Grant Smith
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> >
>
Re: Stable MyFaces 1.2.1 OR open issues for 1.2.1 ? (was Re: Help with Myfaces-core-1.2.0)
Posted by Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>.
I have seen a message today on the Geronimo's mailing list with a
howto on running seam on Geronimo. That should mean that it runs fine
with myfaces...
Cheers,
Bruno
On 30/11/2007, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> Grant, if you are using Seam or active in that community,
> please try the combi :-)
>
> On Nov 30, 2007 6:55 PM, Grant Smith <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Does anyone have any experience with this potential release, and Seam
> > 2.0.0.GA ? Recently (well about 4 months ago now), Seam dumped Myfaces in
> > favor of the RI, so it would be excellent to get our foot back in that door,
> > so to speak.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Nov 30, 2007 9:32 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > k
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Nov 30, 2007 6:30 PM, Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Nov 30, 2007, at 12:17 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > This user was able to *swap* the RI out and put the 121-SNAPSHOT in.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think, that is a good point to kick a release out.
> > > > > Are there any bugs open, that needs to make it into 121-line ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Should we just release it?
> > > > > Or should we provide at least an RC (release_candidate) ?
> > > >
> > > > I think it would be OK to go ahead and release. If we want to get
> > > > some feedback on its quality then we could conduct voting like the
> > > > Tomcat team does. They tag a release, create the binaries, and then
> > > > vote the binaries as being broken, alpha, beta, or stable. For
> > > > example see:
> > > > http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-build-6.0.10-tf3239720.html
> > > >
> > > > That system seems to work pretty well and doesn't leave any RC bits
> > > > lying around.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best wishes,
> > > > Paul
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > further stuff:
> > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Grant Smith
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>
Re: Stable MyFaces 1.2.1 OR open issues for 1.2.1 ? (was Re: Help with Myfaces-core-1.2.0)
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
Grant, if you are using Seam or active in that community,
please try the combi :-)
On Nov 30, 2007 6:55 PM, Grant Smith <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Does anyone have any experience with this potential release, and Seam
> 2.0.0.GA ? Recently (well about 4 months ago now), Seam dumped Myfaces in
> favor of the RI, so it would be excellent to get our foot back in that door,
> so to speak.
>
>
>
> On Nov 30, 2007 9:32 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > k
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Nov 30, 2007 6:30 PM, Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Nov 30, 2007, at 12:17 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > >
> > > > This user was able to *swap* the RI out and put the 121-SNAPSHOT in.
> > > >
> > > > I think, that is a good point to kick a release out.
> > > > Are there any bugs open, that needs to make it into 121-line ?
> > > >
> > > > Should we just release it?
> > > > Or should we provide at least an RC (release_candidate) ?
> > >
> > > I think it would be OK to go ahead and release. If we want to get
> > > some feedback on its quality then we could conduct voting like the
> > > Tomcat team does. They tag a release, create the binaries, and then
> > > vote the binaries as being broken, alpha, beta, or stable. For
> > > example see:
> > > http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-build-6.0.10-tf3239720.html
> > >
> > > That system seems to work pretty well and doesn't leave any RC bits
> > > lying around.
> > >
> > >
> > > Best wishes,
> > > Paul
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> >
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Grant Smith
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: Stable MyFaces 1.2.1 OR open issues for 1.2.1 ? (was Re: Help with Myfaces-core-1.2.0)
Posted by Grant Smith <wo...@gmail.com>.
Does anyone have any experience with this potential release, and Seam
2.0.0.GA ? Recently (well about 4 months ago now), Seam dumped Myfaces in
favor of the RI, so it would be excellent to get our foot back in that door,
so to speak.
On Nov 30, 2007 9:32 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> k
>
> On Nov 30, 2007 6:30 PM, Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 30, 2007, at 12:17 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> >
> > > This user was able to *swap* the RI out and put the 121-SNAPSHOT in.
> > >
> > > I think, that is a good point to kick a release out.
> > > Are there any bugs open, that needs to make it into 121-line ?
> > >
> > > Should we just release it?
> > > Or should we provide at least an RC (release_candidate) ?
> >
> > I think it would be OK to go ahead and release. If we want to get
> > some feedback on its quality then we could conduct voting like the
> > Tomcat team does. They tag a release, create the binaries, and then
> > vote the binaries as being broken, alpha, beta, or stable. For
> > example see:
> > http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-build-6.0.10-tf3239720.html
> >
> > That system seems to work pretty well and doesn't leave any RC bits
> > lying around.
> >
> >
> > Best wishes,
> > Paul
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>
--
Grant Smith
Re: Stable MyFaces 1.2.1 OR open issues for 1.2.1 ? (was Re: Help with Myfaces-core-1.2.0)
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
k
On Nov 30, 2007 6:30 PM, Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 30, 2007, at 12:17 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>
> > This user was able to *swap* the RI out and put the 121-SNAPSHOT in.
> >
> > I think, that is a good point to kick a release out.
> > Are there any bugs open, that needs to make it into 121-line ?
> >
> > Should we just release it?
> > Or should we provide at least an RC (release_candidate) ?
>
> I think it would be OK to go ahead and release. If we want to get
> some feedback on its quality then we could conduct voting like the
> Tomcat team does. They tag a release, create the binaries, and then
> vote the binaries as being broken, alpha, beta, or stable. For
> example see:
> http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-build-6.0.10-tf3239720.html
>
> That system seems to work pretty well and doesn't leave any RC bits
> lying around.
>
>
> Best wishes,
> Paul
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: Stable MyFaces 1.2.1 OR open issues for 1.2.1 ? (was Re: Help with Myfaces-core-1.2.0)
Posted by Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com>.
On Nov 30, 2007, at 12:17 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> This user was able to *swap* the RI out and put the 121-SNAPSHOT in.
>
> I think, that is a good point to kick a release out.
> Are there any bugs open, that needs to make it into 121-line ?
>
> Should we just release it?
> Or should we provide at least an RC (release_candidate) ?
I think it would be OK to go ahead and release. If we want to get
some feedback on its quality then we could conduct voting like the
Tomcat team does. They tag a release, create the binaries, and then
vote the binaries as being broken, alpha, beta, or stable. For
example see:
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-build-6.0.10-tf3239720.html
That system seems to work pretty well and doesn't leave any RC bits
lying around.
Best wishes,
Paul