You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@avalon.apache.org by Berin Loritsch <bl...@citi-us.com> on 2002/11/26 19:02:30 UTC
Informal results so far
I want to keep voting open for at least 24 hours. That
means that we can't draw any conclusive results until
roughly 9:14 AM EST tomorrow.
So far, we have near unanimous vote for Proposal 1 (one
container with multiple profiles). So far the people
who have voted for Proposal 1 are:
Neeme Praks
Stephen McConnell
Marcus Crafter
Carsten Ziegeler
The person who has voted for Proposal 2 is:
Leo Sutic
Yet to vote are:
Myself (Berin)
Stefano
Leo Simmons
Leif
Paul Hammant
Peter Royal
and more.
I can go either way.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Informal results so far
Posted by Paul Hammant <Pa...@yahoo.com>.
I've been thinking about this a while. My vote in favor of #1 is
tactical. I'f prefer 'long live all containers, compatible at A-F
interfaces only', but it was not listed as an option. We have to some
degree the convergence of containers forced on us, #1 seemed a good
choice. Don't get me wrong, I'll help with the convergence, I just
think it is wrong on merit.
- Paul
>An update to the informal results. Voting is still open
>(is there any interested party who has yet to vote?)
>
>
>For Proposal 1 (unified container with profiles)
>------------------------------------------------
>Neeme Praks
>Stephen McConnell
>Marcus Crafter
>Carsten Ziegler
>Pete Royal
>Stefano Mazzocchi
>Leif Mortenson
>Paul Hammant
>Leo Simmons
>Berin Loritsch (I finally decided)
>
>
>For Proposal 2 (tiered set of containers)
>-----------------------------------------
>Leo Sutic
>
>
>
>Leo Sutic, how firm are you on proposal 2? It seems
>that the community is leaning strongly toward a unified
>container.
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
RE: Informal results so far
Posted by Leo Sutic <le...@inspireinfrastructure.com>.
> From: Berin Loritsch [mailto:bloritsch@citi-us.com]
>
> For Proposal 1 (unified container with profiles)
> ------------------------------------------------
> Neeme Praks
> Stephen McConnell
> Marcus Crafter
> Carsten Ziegler
> Pete Royal
> Stefano Mazzocchi
> Leif Mortenson
> Paul Hammant
> Leo Simmons
> Berin Loritsch (I finally decided)
>
>
> For Proposal 2 (tiered set of containers)
> -----------------------------------------
> Leo Sutic
>
>
>
> Leo Sutic, how firm are you on proposal 2?
Don't consider it any kind of veto.
> It seems
> that the community is leaning strongly toward a unified container.
Proposal 1 has won as far as I'm concerned, and I'll get with the
program no problem.
/LS
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
RE: Informal results so far
Posted by Berin Loritsch <bl...@citi-us.com>.
An update to the informal results. Voting is still open
(is there any interested party who has yet to vote?)
For Proposal 1 (unified container with profiles)
------------------------------------------------
Neeme Praks
Stephen McConnell
Marcus Crafter
Carsten Ziegler
Pete Royal
Stefano Mazzocchi
Leif Mortenson
Paul Hammant
Leo Simmons
Berin Loritsch (I finally decided)
For Proposal 2 (tiered set of containers)
-----------------------------------------
Leo Sutic
Leo Sutic, how firm are you on proposal 2? It seems
that the community is leaning strongly toward a unified
container.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Informal results so far
Posted by Berin Loritsch <bl...@apache.org>.
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>Berin,
>
>As a non-voting consumer of the technology, Id suggest that you adopt
>proposal #1, but be prepared to use the existing containers as test beds.
>Because there are two issues that need to come out of this:
>
> 1) How do we build the scalable container?
> 2) How do we build portable components that work with different
> profiles?
>
>The existing code can be used to help answer the second question.
>
>FWIW, this week is Thanksgiving in the USA. Tomorrow is a travel day for a
>lot of people. For Americans, this is not a good week for making major
>project decisions.
>
>
Right. BTW, voting is open as long as needed (I thought I sent that
message to the list, but I guess not).
---------------------------------------------
Introducing NetZero Long Distance
1st month Free!
Sign up today at: www.netzerolongdistance.com
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
RE: Informal results so far
Posted by "Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>.
Berin,
As a non-voting consumer of the technology, Id suggest that you adopt
proposal #1, but be prepared to use the existing containers as test beds.
Because there are two issues that need to come out of this:
1) How do we build the scalable container?
2) How do we build portable components that work with different
profiles?
The existing code can be used to help answer the second question.
FWIW, this week is Thanksgiving in the USA. Tomorrow is a travel day for a
lot of people. For Americans, this is not a good week for making major
project decisions.
--- Noel
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>