Split Interop Module ...

[Mark <de...@hotmail.com>]

I am considering the idea of splitting up the interop module into two 
different pieces: interop and interop-corba.    Moving forward, the 
interop module will need to make some calls into OpenEJB and 
OpenEJB/interop will both require generated corba related classes.  The 
OpenEJB dependency could be change to interop-corba and the interop 
module could depend on both interop-corba and OpenEJB.

I anticipate this to be a minor change with no interrpution on other 
developers.

Any thoughts?

Thanks
Mark

Re: Split Interop Module ...

[Dain Sundstrom <ds...@gluecode.com>]

On Mar 29, 2005, at 7:36 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:

> Mark wrote:
>> I am considering the idea of splitting up the interop module into two 
>> different pieces: interop and interop-corba.    Moving forward, the 
>> interop module will need to make some calls into OpenEJB and 
>> OpenEJB/interop will both require generated corba related classes.  
>> The OpenEJB dependency could be change to interop-corba and the 
>> interop module could depend on both interop-corba and OpenEJB.
>> I anticipate this to be a minor change with no interrpution on other 
>> developers.
>> Any thoughts?
>
> Just that we need to ensure that Geronimo does not depend on OpenEJB - 
> where we are calling in it should be through interfaces that Geronimo 
> defines and OpenEJB implements.

Mark, please create a new fresh email when sending something to the 
list.  When you respond to an existing email and clean out the body and 
subject, the mail headers that link this new email to the previous 
thread are still intact, so many mail clients will automatically mix 
the new thread emails into the original thread.

Anyway, is this the Adapter code for OpenEJB?  If so, this code is very 
OpenEJB specific and should be moved into the OpenEJB project instead 
of being part of Geronimo.  Then we don't have circular dependency 
problems.

-dain

Re: Split Interop Module ...

[Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org>]

Mark wrote:
> I am considering the idea of splitting up the interop module into two 
> different pieces: interop and interop-corba.    Moving forward, the 
> interop module will need to make some calls into OpenEJB and 
> OpenEJB/interop will both require generated corba related classes.  The 
> OpenEJB dependency could be change to interop-corba and the interop 
> module could depend on both interop-corba and OpenEJB.
> 
> I anticipate this to be a minor change with no interrpution on other 
> developers.
> 
> Any thoughts?
> 

Just that we need to ensure that Geronimo does not depend on OpenEJB - 
where we are calling in it should be through interfaces that Geronimo 
defines and OpenEJB implements.

--
Jeremy