You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to doxia-dev@maven.apache.org by Lukas Theussl <lt...@apache.org> on 2007/09/07 09:25:53 UTC
head element in site.xml?
Hi,
I just noticed that the site descriptors for the doxia (and maven) site
contain a <head> element, apparently to include a javascript snippet in
all created site pages. I was not aware that this was possible, it's not
mentioned anywhere in the docs and google didn't help me either.
Problem is: 1st, it causes a bug that makes all maven generated pages
invalid XHTML [1], and 2nd I have already told a user that it's illegal
[also 1].
So question: should it be supported officially? If yes, whoever knows
more, please document! :)
-Lukas
[1] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-230
Re: head element in site.xml?
Posted by push <pu...@agreeya.com>.
is there any othwer way to put site.xml other thn putting it inside src/site
folder
Vincent Siveton wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> 2007/9/7, Lukas Theussl <lt...@apache.org>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just noticed that the site descriptors for the doxia (and maven) site
>> contain a <head> element, apparently to include a javascript snippet in
>> all created site pages. I was not aware that this was possible, it's not
>> mentioned anywhere in the docs and google didn't help me either.
>
> Exactly.
> A small doc is in the description of the head field in decoration.mdo
> (doxia-decoration-model).
>
>> Problem is: 1st, it causes a bug that makes all maven generated pages
>> invalid XHTML [1], and 2nd I have already told a user that it's illegal
>> [also 1].
>>
>> So question: should it be supported officially? If yes, whoever knows
>> more, please document! :)
>
> We need it, as brett said.
>
> For your first point, it due to a non-desired behaviour in p-u. Have a
> glance to the comment in
> org.codehaus.plexus.util.xml.Xpp3Dom#toString()
> I will fix the default-site.vm with a small workaround.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Vincent
>
>>
>> -Lukas
>>
>> [1] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-230
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/head-element-in-site.xml--tp12537293p20674990.html
Sent from the Doxia - dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: head element in site.xml?
Posted by Vincent Siveton <vi...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
2007/9/7, Lukas Theussl <lt...@apache.org>:
> Hi,
>
> I just noticed that the site descriptors for the doxia (and maven) site
> contain a <head> element, apparently to include a javascript snippet in
> all created site pages. I was not aware that this was possible, it's not
> mentioned anywhere in the docs and google didn't help me either.
Exactly.
A small doc is in the description of the head field in decoration.mdo
(doxia-decoration-model).
> Problem is: 1st, it causes a bug that makes all maven generated pages
> invalid XHTML [1], and 2nd I have already told a user that it's illegal
> [also 1].
>
> So question: should it be supported officially? If yes, whoever knows
> more, please document! :)
We need it, as brett said.
For your first point, it due to a non-desired behaviour in p-u. Have a
glance to the comment in
org.codehaus.plexus.util.xml.Xpp3Dom#toString()
I will fix the default-site.vm with a small workaround.
Cheers,
Vincent
>
> -Lukas
>
> [1] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-230
>
Re: head element in site.xml?
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
Yes :)
Though it's probably a bit dodgy as is. It really is XHTML specific -
you probably want some more general way to include in there.
The JavaScript is for Google Analytics (which btw, seems to have
broken with a recent site deploy... traffic halved suddenly 2 weeks ago)
- Brett
On 07/09/2007, at 5:25 PM, Lukas Theussl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just noticed that the site descriptors for the doxia (and maven)
> site contain a <head> element, apparently to include a javascript
> snippet in all created site pages. I was not aware that this was
> possible, it's not mentioned anywhere in the docs and google didn't
> help me either.
>
> Problem is: 1st, it causes a bug that makes all maven generated
> pages invalid XHTML [1], and 2nd I have already told a user that
> it's illegal [also 1].
>
> So question: should it be supported officially? If yes, whoever
> knows more, please document! :)
>
> -Lukas
>
> [1] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-230
--
Brett Porter - brett@apache.org
Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/