You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by "Zakharov, Vasily M" <va...@intel.com> on 2007/10/05 02:57:17 UTC
Moving to TranQL 1.4 ?
Hi,
Are there any plans of moving to the next version of TranQL, 1.3.1 or
maybe 1.4-SNAPSHOT?
Both seem to be available at http://dist.codehaus.org/tranql/jars/
When I was working with G1.x last year, it was found that a critical
flaw exists in TranQL 1.3, that prevents SPECjAppServer2004 from
successfuly running on Geronimo - SjAS requires a support of
READ_COMMITTED and REPEATABLE_READ transaction isolation levels in XA
mode, and TranQL 1.3 only supports READ_UNCOMMITTED level. Issue
GERONIMO-2128 <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2128> is
related to this issue, and it's still open.
At that time Matt Hostrom said he has plans to add the necessary support
in TranQL 1.3.1 or 1.4, but as I can see, G2.0.1 still uses TranQL 1.3:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.geronimo.user/3427
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openejb.devel/3926
Matt, could you, or anyone else, please shed some light on the current
situation with this issue?
Thank you very much!
Vasily Zakharov
Intel ESSD
---
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O
Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation,
Chapayevsky Per, 14.
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
RE: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ?
Posted by "Zakharov, Vasily M" <va...@intel.com>.
Whoa, that's great!
If there's anything I could do to help - I'd gladly do.
Thank you!
Vasily
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:matt@hogstrom.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 9:36 PM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ?
Hi Vasiliy,
I put a draft out about two weeks ago and need to publish the final.
I'd expect with Thanksgiving and some other stuff I'd be able to get
going in early December.
On Nov 13, 2007, at 10:40 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
> Matt,
>
> Are there any news on that? :)
>
> Thanks!
>
> Vasily
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:matt@hogstrom.org]
> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 8:48 AM
> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ?
>
> Excellent ... I'm finishing some other performance work. When I get
> that completed I'd like to get this tested.
>
> It will be nice to finally run the monster ;-P
>
> On Oct 4, 2007, at 11:29 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
>
>> Hi, Matt,
>>
>> Great to hear from you, and great to hear the news!
>>
>> I've tried to update the deployment plans to G2.0.1 as best as I
>> could,
>> here's what I have now:
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/64828/sjas-
>> app.x
>> ml
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/64828/sjas-
>> db.xm
>> l
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/64828/sjas-
>> jms.x
>> ml
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC20/
>> SPECjAppServer2004
>>
>> It has issues working (e. g. for now I can't lookup the beans through
>> JNDI externally), but at least it deploys with no errors. I assume
>> some
>> things there are anyway obsolete and have to be replaced. Please also
>> note issues OPENEJB-700 and OPENEJB-701 filed while trying to make
>> the
>> things above work, adjustments were made to workaround OPENEJB-701.
>>
>> Thanks alot for your help!
>>
>> Vasily
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:matt@hogstrom.org]
>> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 6:56 AM
>> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ?
>>
>> Vasily,
>>
>> We've moved from TranQL for the support of CMP to OpenJPA. Dain
>> provided a neat bridge so we can use the same technology for EJB 3
>> and EJB 2.x. At this point you can achieve the desired results using
>> the orm.xml and OpenJPA configuration. I'd be interested in helping
>> you out on this. Do you have a current set of DDs your working from
>> or are these the same ones as we had back in http://svn.apache.org/
>> repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/specjappserver2004/
>>
>>
>> On Oct 4, 2007, at 8:57 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Are there any plans of moving to the next version of TranQL, 1.3.1
>>> or
>>> maybe 1.4-SNAPSHOT?
>>> Both seem to be available at http://dist.codehaus.org/tranql/jars/
>>>
>>> When I was working with G1.x last year, it was found that a critical
>>> flaw exists in TranQL 1.3, that prevents SPECjAppServer2004 from
>>> successfuly running on Geronimo - SjAS requires a support of
>>> READ_COMMITTED and REPEATABLE_READ transaction isolation levels in
>>> XA
>>> mode, and TranQL 1.3 only supports READ_UNCOMMITTED level. Issue
>>> GERONIMO-2128 <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
>>> GERONIMO-2128> is
>>> related to this issue, and it's still open.
>>>
>>> At that time Matt Hostrom said he has plans to add the necessary
>>> support
>>> in TranQL 1.3.1 or 1.4, but as I can see, G2.0.1 still uses TranQL
>>> 1.3:
>>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.geronimo.user/3427
>>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openejb.devel/3926
>>>
>>> Matt, could you, or anyone else, please shed some light on the
>>> current
>>> situation with this issue?
>>>
>>> Thank you very much!
>>>
>>> Vasily Zakharov
>>> Intel ESSD
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O
>>> Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation,
>>> Chapayevsky Per, 14.
>>>
>>> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material
>>> for
>>> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or
>>> distribution
>>> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
>>> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
>>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O
>> Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation,
>> Chapayevsky Per, 14.
>>
>> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
>> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
>> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
>> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
>>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O
> Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation,
> Chapayevsky Per, 14.
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O
Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation,
Chapayevsky Per, 14.
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
Re: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ?
Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.
Hi Vasiliy,
I put a draft out about two weeks ago and need to publish the final.
I'd expect with Thanksgiving and some other stuff I'd be able to get
going in early December.
On Nov 13, 2007, at 10:40 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
> Matt,
>
> Are there any news on that? :)
>
> Thanks!
>
> Vasily
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:matt@hogstrom.org]
> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 8:48 AM
> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ?
>
> Excellent ... I'm finishing some other performance work. When I get
> that completed I'd like to get this tested.
>
> It will be nice to finally run the monster ;-P
>
> On Oct 4, 2007, at 11:29 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
>
>> Hi, Matt,
>>
>> Great to hear from you, and great to hear the news!
>>
>> I've tried to update the deployment plans to G2.0.1 as best as I
>> could,
>> here's what I have now:
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/64828/sjas-
>> app.x
>> ml
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/64828/sjas-
>> db.xm
>> l
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/64828/sjas-
>> jms.x
>> ml
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC20/
>> SPECjAppServer2004
>>
>> It has issues working (e. g. for now I can't lookup the beans through
>> JNDI externally), but at least it deploys with no errors. I assume
>> some
>> things there are anyway obsolete and have to be replaced. Please also
>> note issues OPENEJB-700 and OPENEJB-701 filed while trying to make
>> the
>> things above work, adjustments were made to workaround OPENEJB-701.
>>
>> Thanks alot for your help!
>>
>> Vasily
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:matt@hogstrom.org]
>> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 6:56 AM
>> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ?
>>
>> Vasily,
>>
>> We've moved from TranQL for the support of CMP to OpenJPA. Dain
>> provided a neat bridge so we can use the same technology for EJB 3
>> and EJB 2.x. At this point you can achieve the desired results using
>> the orm.xml and OpenJPA configuration. I'd be interested in helping
>> you out on this. Do you have a current set of DDs your working from
>> or are these the same ones as we had back in http://svn.apache.org/
>> repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/specjappserver2004/
>>
>>
>> On Oct 4, 2007, at 8:57 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Are there any plans of moving to the next version of TranQL, 1.3.1
>>> or
>>> maybe 1.4-SNAPSHOT?
>>> Both seem to be available at http://dist.codehaus.org/tranql/jars/
>>>
>>> When I was working with G1.x last year, it was found that a critical
>>> flaw exists in TranQL 1.3, that prevents SPECjAppServer2004 from
>>> successfuly running on Geronimo - SjAS requires a support of
>>> READ_COMMITTED and REPEATABLE_READ transaction isolation levels in
>>> XA
>>> mode, and TranQL 1.3 only supports READ_UNCOMMITTED level. Issue
>>> GERONIMO-2128 <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
>>> GERONIMO-2128> is
>>> related to this issue, and it's still open.
>>>
>>> At that time Matt Hostrom said he has plans to add the necessary
>>> support
>>> in TranQL 1.3.1 or 1.4, but as I can see, G2.0.1 still uses TranQL
>>> 1.3:
>>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.geronimo.user/3427
>>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openejb.devel/3926
>>>
>>> Matt, could you, or anyone else, please shed some light on the
>>> current
>>> situation with this issue?
>>>
>>> Thank you very much!
>>>
>>> Vasily Zakharov
>>> Intel ESSD
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O
>>> Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation,
>>> Chapayevsky Per, 14.
>>>
>>> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material
>>> for
>>> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or
>>> distribution
>>> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
>>> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
>>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O
>> Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation,
>> Chapayevsky Per, 14.
>>
>> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
>> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
>> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
>> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
>>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O
> Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation,
> Chapayevsky Per, 14.
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
>
RE: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ?
Posted by "Zakharov, Vasily M" <va...@intel.com>.
Matt,
Are there any news on that? :)
Thanks!
Vasily
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:matt@hogstrom.org]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 8:48 AM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ?
Excellent ... I'm finishing some other performance work. When I get
that completed I'd like to get this tested.
It will be nice to finally run the monster ;-P
On Oct 4, 2007, at 11:29 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
> Hi, Matt,
>
> Great to hear from you, and great to hear the news!
>
> I've tried to update the deployment plans to G2.0.1 as best as I
> could,
> here's what I have now:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/64828/sjas-
> app.x
> ml
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/64828/sjas-
> db.xm
> l
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/64828/sjas-
> jms.x
> ml
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC20/
> SPECjAppServer2004
>
> It has issues working (e. g. for now I can't lookup the beans through
> JNDI externally), but at least it deploys with no errors. I assume
> some
> things there are anyway obsolete and have to be replaced. Please also
> note issues OPENEJB-700 and OPENEJB-701 filed while trying to make the
> things above work, adjustments were made to workaround OPENEJB-701.
>
> Thanks alot for your help!
>
> Vasily
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:matt@hogstrom.org]
> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 6:56 AM
> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ?
>
> Vasily,
>
> We've moved from TranQL for the support of CMP to OpenJPA. Dain
> provided a neat bridge so we can use the same technology for EJB 3
> and EJB 2.x. At this point you can achieve the desired results using
> the orm.xml and OpenJPA configuration. I'd be interested in helping
> you out on this. Do you have a current set of DDs your working from
> or are these the same ones as we had back in http://svn.apache.org/
> repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/specjappserver2004/
>
>
> On Oct 4, 2007, at 8:57 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Are there any plans of moving to the next version of TranQL, 1.3.1 or
>> maybe 1.4-SNAPSHOT?
>> Both seem to be available at http://dist.codehaus.org/tranql/jars/
>>
>> When I was working with G1.x last year, it was found that a critical
>> flaw exists in TranQL 1.3, that prevents SPECjAppServer2004 from
>> successfuly running on Geronimo - SjAS requires a support of
>> READ_COMMITTED and REPEATABLE_READ transaction isolation levels in XA
>> mode, and TranQL 1.3 only supports READ_UNCOMMITTED level. Issue
>> GERONIMO-2128 <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
>> GERONIMO-2128> is
>> related to this issue, and it's still open.
>>
>> At that time Matt Hostrom said he has plans to add the necessary
>> support
>> in TranQL 1.3.1 or 1.4, but as I can see, G2.0.1 still uses TranQL
>> 1.3:
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.geronimo.user/3427
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openejb.devel/3926
>>
>> Matt, could you, or anyone else, please shed some light on the
>> current
>> situation with this issue?
>>
>> Thank you very much!
>>
>> Vasily Zakharov
>> Intel ESSD
>>
>>
>> ---
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O
>> Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation,
>> Chapayevsky Per, 14.
>>
>> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
>> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
>> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
>> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
>>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O
> Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation,
> Chapayevsky Per, 14.
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O
Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation,
Chapayevsky Per, 14.
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
RE: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ?
Posted by "Zakharov, Vasily M" <va...@intel.com>.
Yeah, indeed. :)
Thank you!
Vasily
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:matt@hogstrom.org]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 8:48 AM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ?
Excellent ... I'm finishing some other performance work. When I get
that completed I'd like to get this tested.
It will be nice to finally run the monster ;-P
On Oct 4, 2007, at 11:29 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
> Hi, Matt,
>
> Great to hear from you, and great to hear the news!
>
> I've tried to update the deployment plans to G2.0.1 as best as I
> could,
> here's what I have now:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/64828/sjas-
> app.x
> ml
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/64828/sjas-
> db.xm
> l
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/64828/sjas-
> jms.x
> ml
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC20/
> SPECjAppServer2004
>
> It has issues working (e. g. for now I can't lookup the beans through
> JNDI externally), but at least it deploys with no errors. I assume
> some
> things there are anyway obsolete and have to be replaced. Please also
> note issues OPENEJB-700 and OPENEJB-701 filed while trying to make the
> things above work, adjustments were made to workaround OPENEJB-701.
>
> Thanks alot for your help!
>
> Vasily
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:matt@hogstrom.org]
> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 6:56 AM
> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ?
>
> Vasily,
>
> We've moved from TranQL for the support of CMP to OpenJPA. Dain
> provided a neat bridge so we can use the same technology for EJB 3
> and EJB 2.x. At this point you can achieve the desired results using
> the orm.xml and OpenJPA configuration. I'd be interested in helping
> you out on this. Do you have a current set of DDs your working from
> or are these the same ones as we had back in http://svn.apache.org/
> repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/specjappserver2004/
>
>
> On Oct 4, 2007, at 8:57 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Are there any plans of moving to the next version of TranQL, 1.3.1 or
>> maybe 1.4-SNAPSHOT?
>> Both seem to be available at http://dist.codehaus.org/tranql/jars/
>>
>> When I was working with G1.x last year, it was found that a critical
>> flaw exists in TranQL 1.3, that prevents SPECjAppServer2004 from
>> successfuly running on Geronimo - SjAS requires a support of
>> READ_COMMITTED and REPEATABLE_READ transaction isolation levels in XA
>> mode, and TranQL 1.3 only supports READ_UNCOMMITTED level. Issue
>> GERONIMO-2128 <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
>> GERONIMO-2128> is
>> related to this issue, and it's still open.
>>
>> At that time Matt Hostrom said he has plans to add the necessary
>> support
>> in TranQL 1.3.1 or 1.4, but as I can see, G2.0.1 still uses TranQL
>> 1.3:
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.geronimo.user/3427
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openejb.devel/3926
>>
>> Matt, could you, or anyone else, please shed some light on the
>> current
>> situation with this issue?
>>
>> Thank you very much!
>>
>> Vasily Zakharov
>> Intel ESSD
>>
>>
>> ---
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O
>> Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation,
>> Chapayevsky Per, 14.
>>
>> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
>> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
>> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
>> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
>>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O
> Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation,
> Chapayevsky Per, 14.
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O
Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation,
Chapayevsky Per, 14.
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
Re: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ?
Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.
Excellent ... I'm finishing some other performance work. When I get
that completed I'd like to get this tested.
It will be nice to finally run the monster ;-P
On Oct 4, 2007, at 11:29 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
> Hi, Matt,
>
> Great to hear from you, and great to hear the news!
>
> I've tried to update the deployment plans to G2.0.1 as best as I
> could,
> here's what I have now:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/64828/sjas-
> app.x
> ml
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/64828/sjas-
> db.xm
> l
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/64828/sjas-
> jms.x
> ml
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC20/
> SPECjAppServer2004
>
> It has issues working (e. g. for now I can't lookup the beans through
> JNDI externally), but at least it deploys with no errors. I assume
> some
> things there are anyway obsolete and have to be replaced. Please also
> note issues OPENEJB-700 and OPENEJB-701 filed while trying to make the
> things above work, adjustments were made to workaround OPENEJB-701.
>
> Thanks alot for your help!
>
> Vasily
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:matt@hogstrom.org]
> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 6:56 AM
> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ?
>
> Vasily,
>
> We've moved from TranQL for the support of CMP to OpenJPA. Dain
> provided a neat bridge so we can use the same technology for EJB 3
> and EJB 2.x. At this point you can achieve the desired results using
> the orm.xml and OpenJPA configuration. I'd be interested in helping
> you out on this. Do you have a current set of DDs your working from
> or are these the same ones as we had back in http://svn.apache.org/
> repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/specjappserver2004/
>
>
> On Oct 4, 2007, at 8:57 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Are there any plans of moving to the next version of TranQL, 1.3.1 or
>> maybe 1.4-SNAPSHOT?
>> Both seem to be available at http://dist.codehaus.org/tranql/jars/
>>
>> When I was working with G1.x last year, it was found that a critical
>> flaw exists in TranQL 1.3, that prevents SPECjAppServer2004 from
>> successfuly running on Geronimo - SjAS requires a support of
>> READ_COMMITTED and REPEATABLE_READ transaction isolation levels in XA
>> mode, and TranQL 1.3 only supports READ_UNCOMMITTED level. Issue
>> GERONIMO-2128 <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
>> GERONIMO-2128> is
>> related to this issue, and it's still open.
>>
>> At that time Matt Hostrom said he has plans to add the necessary
>> support
>> in TranQL 1.3.1 or 1.4, but as I can see, G2.0.1 still uses TranQL
>> 1.3:
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.geronimo.user/3427
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openejb.devel/3926
>>
>> Matt, could you, or anyone else, please shed some light on the
>> current
>> situation with this issue?
>>
>> Thank you very much!
>>
>> Vasily Zakharov
>> Intel ESSD
>>
>>
>> ---
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O
>> Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation,
>> Chapayevsky Per, 14.
>>
>> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
>> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
>> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
>> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
>>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O
> Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation,
> Chapayevsky Per, 14.
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
>
RE: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ?
Posted by "Zakharov, Vasily M" <va...@intel.com>.
Hi, Matt,
Great to hear from you, and great to hear the news!
I've tried to update the deployment plans to G2.0.1 as best as I could,
here's what I have now:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/64828/sjas-app.x
ml
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/64828/sjas-db.xm
l
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/64828/sjas-jms.x
ml
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC20/SPECjAppServer2004
It has issues working (e. g. for now I can't lookup the beans through
JNDI externally), but at least it deploys with no errors. I assume some
things there are anyway obsolete and have to be replaced. Please also
note issues OPENEJB-700 and OPENEJB-701 filed while trying to make the
things above work, adjustments were made to workaround OPENEJB-701.
Thanks alot for your help!
Vasily
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:matt@hogstrom.org]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 6:56 AM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ?
Vasily,
We've moved from TranQL for the support of CMP to OpenJPA. Dain
provided a neat bridge so we can use the same technology for EJB 3
and EJB 2.x. At this point you can achieve the desired results using
the orm.xml and OpenJPA configuration. I'd be interested in helping
you out on this. Do you have a current set of DDs your working from
or are these the same ones as we had back in http://svn.apache.org/
repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/specjappserver2004/
On Oct 4, 2007, at 8:57 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are there any plans of moving to the next version of TranQL, 1.3.1 or
> maybe 1.4-SNAPSHOT?
> Both seem to be available at http://dist.codehaus.org/tranql/jars/
>
> When I was working with G1.x last year, it was found that a critical
> flaw exists in TranQL 1.3, that prevents SPECjAppServer2004 from
> successfuly running on Geronimo - SjAS requires a support of
> READ_COMMITTED and REPEATABLE_READ transaction isolation levels in XA
> mode, and TranQL 1.3 only supports READ_UNCOMMITTED level. Issue
> GERONIMO-2128 <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2128> is
> related to this issue, and it's still open.
>
> At that time Matt Hostrom said he has plans to add the necessary
> support
> in TranQL 1.3.1 or 1.4, but as I can see, G2.0.1 still uses TranQL
> 1.3:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.geronimo.user/3427
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openejb.devel/3926
>
> Matt, could you, or anyone else, please shed some light on the current
> situation with this issue?
>
> Thank you very much!
>
> Vasily Zakharov
> Intel ESSD
>
>
> ---
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O
> Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation,
> Chapayevsky Per, 14.
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O
Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation,
Chapayevsky Per, 14.
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
Re: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ?
Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.
Vasily,
We've moved from TranQL for the support of CMP to OpenJPA. Dain
provided a neat bridge so we can use the same technology for EJB 3
and EJB 2.x. At this point you can achieve the desired results using
the orm.xml and OpenJPA configuration. I'd be interested in helping
you out on this. Do you have a current set of DDs your working from
or are these the same ones as we had back in http://svn.apache.org/
repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/specjappserver2004/
On Oct 4, 2007, at 8:57 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are there any plans of moving to the next version of TranQL, 1.3.1 or
> maybe 1.4-SNAPSHOT?
> Both seem to be available at http://dist.codehaus.org/tranql/jars/
>
> When I was working with G1.x last year, it was found that a critical
> flaw exists in TranQL 1.3, that prevents SPECjAppServer2004 from
> successfuly running on Geronimo - SjAS requires a support of
> READ_COMMITTED and REPEATABLE_READ transaction isolation levels in XA
> mode, and TranQL 1.3 only supports READ_UNCOMMITTED level. Issue
> GERONIMO-2128 <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2128> is
> related to this issue, and it's still open.
>
> At that time Matt Hostrom said he has plans to add the necessary
> support
> in TranQL 1.3.1 or 1.4, but as I can see, G2.0.1 still uses TranQL
> 1.3:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.geronimo.user/3427
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openejb.devel/3926
>
> Matt, could you, or anyone else, please shed some light on the current
> situation with this issue?
>
> Thank you very much!
>
> Vasily Zakharov
> Intel ESSD
>
>
> ---
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O
> Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation,
> Chapayevsky Per, 14.
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
>