You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@synapse.apache.org by Rajika Kumarasiri <ra...@gmail.com> on 2013/07/30 16:56:04 UTC

log4j 2

http://www.grobmeier.de/log4j-2-performance-close-to-insane-20072013.html

http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/async.html#Performance

May be we can migrate to log4j 2 at some point in future.

Rajika

Re: log4j 2

Posted by Hiranya Jayathilaka <hi...@gmail.com>.

Well, we don't directly use log4j. We use commons-logging. If commons-logging is compatible with the new version of log4j, then +1 for the upgrade.

Thanks,
Hiranya

On Jul 30, 2013, at 7:56 AM, Rajika Kumarasiri <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:

> http://www.grobmeier.de/log4j-2-performance-close-to-insane-20072013.html
> 
> http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/async.html#Performance
> 
> May be we can migrate to log4j 2 at some point in future. 
> 
> Rajika

--
Hiranya Jayathilaka
Mayhem Lab/RACE Lab;
Dept. of Computer Science, UCSB;  http://cs.ucsb.edu
E-mail: hiranya@cs.ucsb.edu;  Mobile: +1 (805) 895-7443
Blog: http://techfeast-hiranya.blogspot.com