You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to bugs@httpd.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2004/04/02 03:48:22 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28063] - Missing parameter in ap_log_error and lack of NULL checking in child.c:1051

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28063>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28063

Missing parameter in ap_log_error and lack of NULL checking in child.c:1051





------- Additional Comments From trawick@apache.org  2004-04-02 01:48 -------
The first part of the patch is clearly needed.

Can you verify that you had a crash that required the second change?  No problem
here with a bit of defensive programming in case the code above changes, but
since threads_created and hash table entries are created in lock step, I don't
see how there could be no hash entry.  Curious!

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org